Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The promise and limitations of improved-accuracy gravity field measurements for Uranus and Neptune
View through CrossRef
<p>Uranus and Neptune present unique challenges to planetary modelers. The<br>composition of the so-called ice giants is very uncertain, even more so than the<br>composition of the gas giants. For instance, it is far from clear that either<br>planet's composition is dominated by water. Instead, the composition of Uranus and<br>Neptune likely includes water and other refractory elements in large quantities as<br>well as a substantial H/He envelope. Furthermore, formation models also predict<br>that composition gradients are likely in the interiors of these planets, rather<br>than a neat differentiation into layers of homogeneous composition. (See Helled<br>and Fortney 2020 and references within.)</p><p>A key question that impacts the science case for a potential orbiting mission to<br>Uranus or Neptune is how will more precise measurements of the gravitational field<br>better constrain either planet's interior density profile and composition.<br>Surprisingly, there is yet no published answer to this question. &#160;Here, we present<br>new work that explores this issue, using a Bayesian framework that allows<br>exploration of a wide range of interior density profiles.</p><p>Our approach, which builds off our previous work for Saturn (Movshovitz et al.,<br>2020) and that of others &#160;(e.g. Marley et al., 1995, Helled et al., 2011) takes a<br>relatively unbiased view of the interior structure by employing so-called<br>empirical density profiles. A parameterization is applied to the density profiles<br>directly (via mathematical base functions) instead of to an assumed layered<br>composition (H/He, water, rocks). While some of these empirical density profiles<br>may imply unrealistic compositions, they can also probe solutions that would be<br>missed by the standard layered-composition approach.</p><p>Here we will present models of Uranus and Neptune constructed with this approach,<br>and ask two questions: 1) How large is the space of possible solutions today? 2)<br>How much will it be reduced should a future mission to Uranus and Neptune improve<br>the precision on their gravity field measurements by several orders of magnitude,<br>to the level now available for Jupiter and Saturn?</p>
Title: The promise and limitations of improved-accuracy gravity field measurements for Uranus and Neptune
Description:
<p>Uranus and Neptune present unique challenges to planetary modelers.
The<br>composition of the so-called ice giants is very uncertain, even more so than the<br>composition of the gas giants.
For instance, it is far from clear that either<br>planet's composition is dominated by water.
Instead, the composition of Uranus and<br>Neptune likely includes water and other refractory elements in large quantities as<br>well as a substantial H/He envelope.
Furthermore, formation models also predict<br>that composition gradients are likely in the interiors of these planets, rather<br>than a neat differentiation into layers of homogeneous composition.
(See Helled<br>and Fortney 2020 and references within.
)</p><p>A key question that impacts the science case for a potential orbiting mission to<br>Uranus or Neptune is how will more precise measurements of the gravitational field<br>better constrain either planet's interior density profile and composition.
<br>Surprisingly, there is yet no published answer to this question.
&#160;Here, we present<br>new work that explores this issue, using a Bayesian framework that allows<br>exploration of a wide range of interior density profiles.
</p><p>Our approach, which builds off our previous work for Saturn (Movshovitz et al.
,<br>2020) and that of others &#160;(e.
g.
Marley et al.
, 1995, Helled et al.
, 2011) takes a<br>relatively unbiased view of the interior structure by employing so-called<br>empirical density profiles.
A parameterization is applied to the density profiles<br>directly (via mathematical base functions) instead of to an assumed layered<br>composition (H/He, water, rocks).
While some of these empirical density profiles<br>may imply unrealistic compositions, they can also probe solutions that would be<br>missed by the standard layered-composition approach.
</p><p>Here we will present models of Uranus and Neptune constructed with this approach,<br>and ask two questions: 1) How large is the space of possible solutions today? 2)<br>How much will it be reduced should a future mission to Uranus and Neptune improve<br>the precision on their gravity field measurements by several orders of magnitude,<br>to the level now available for Jupiter and Saturn?</p>.
Related Results
A holistic aerosol model for Uranus and Neptune, including Dark Spots
A holistic aerosol model for Uranus and Neptune, including Dark Spots
<p>Previous studies of the reflectance spectra of Uranus and Neptune concentrated on individual, narrow wavelength regions, inferring solutions for the vertical struc...
Toward a Comprehensive Global Climate Model of Uranus: Radiative-Convective and Dynamical Simulations
Toward a Comprehensive Global Climate Model of Uranus: Radiative-Convective and Dynamical Simulations
Uranus is a unique world in the solar system, with its extreme obliquity and low apparent internal heat flux raising compelling atmospheric and climate dynamics questions. Observat...
Mission Analysis and Navigation Design for Uranus Atmospheric Flight
Mission Analysis and Navigation Design for Uranus Atmospheric Flight
We present a 6 DoF mission concept for in situ probing of Uranus’ atmosphere, consisting of two un-propelled gliders and one orbiter in continuous line of sight. We focus...
Gravity data reduction, Bouguer anomaly, and gravity disturbance
Gravity data reduction, Bouguer anomaly, and gravity disturbance
Each point on the earth has a gravity and gravity potential value. Surfaces formed by connecting points with equal gravity potential values are called equipotential surfaces or lev...
Spectral Image Observations of Uranus’ Near-IR H2 Emission Spectrum using iSHELL
Spectral Image Observations of Uranus’ Near-IR H2 Emission Spectrum using iSHELL
Observations of Uranus’ Near-IR emission spectrum are of interest because they show that the upper atmosphere – the ionosphere and thermosphere – has been cooling since at least th...
Ice Giants
Ice Giants
Abstract
Uranus and Neptune, the “ice giants” in the solar system, represent a fascinating class of planets. They are the outermost planets in the solar system wi...
Empirical Structure Models of Uranus and Neptune 
Empirical Structure Models of Uranus and Neptune 
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea&...
Empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune
Empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune
Uranus and Neptune are still poorly understood. Their gravitational fields, rotation periods, atmosphere dynamics, and internal structures are not well determined. In this paper, w...

