Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The promise and limitations of improved-accuracy gravity field measurements for Uranus and Neptune

View through CrossRef
<p>Uranus and Neptune present unique challenges to planetary modelers. The<br>composition of the so-called ice giants is very uncertain, even more so than the<br>composition of the gas giants. For instance, it is far from clear that either<br>planet's composition is dominated by water. Instead, the composition of Uranus and<br>Neptune likely includes water and other refractory elements in large quantities as<br>well as a substantial H/He envelope. Furthermore, formation models also predict<br>that composition gradients are likely in the interiors of these planets, rather<br>than a neat differentiation into layers of homogeneous composition. (See Helled<br>and Fortney 2020 and references within.)</p><p>A key question that impacts the science case for a potential orbiting mission to<br>Uranus or Neptune is how will more precise measurements of the gravitational field<br>better constrain either planet's interior density profile and composition.<br>Surprisingly, there is yet no published answer to this question.  Here, we present<br>new work that explores this issue, using a Bayesian framework that allows<br>exploration of a wide range of interior density profiles.</p><p>Our approach, which builds off our previous work for Saturn (Movshovitz et al.,<br>2020) and that of others  (e.g. Marley et al., 1995, Helled et al., 2011) takes a<br>relatively unbiased view of the interior structure by employing so-called<br>empirical density profiles. A parameterization is applied to the density profiles<br>directly (via mathematical base functions) instead of to an assumed layered<br>composition (H/He, water, rocks). While some of these empirical density profiles<br>may imply unrealistic compositions, they can also probe solutions that would be<br>missed by the standard layered-composition approach.</p><p>Here we will present models of Uranus and Neptune constructed with this approach,<br>and ask two questions: 1) How large is the space of possible solutions today? 2)<br>How much will it be reduced should a future mission to Uranus and Neptune improve<br>the precision on their gravity field measurements by several orders of magnitude,<br>to the level now available for Jupiter and Saturn?</p>
Title: The promise and limitations of improved-accuracy gravity field measurements for Uranus and Neptune
Description:
<p>Uranus and Neptune present unique challenges to planetary modelers.
The<br>composition of the so-called ice giants is very uncertain, even more so than the<br>composition of the gas giants.
For instance, it is far from clear that either<br>planet's composition is dominated by water.
Instead, the composition of Uranus and<br>Neptune likely includes water and other refractory elements in large quantities as<br>well as a substantial H/He envelope.
Furthermore, formation models also predict<br>that composition gradients are likely in the interiors of these planets, rather<br>than a neat differentiation into layers of homogeneous composition.
(See Helled<br>and Fortney 2020 and references within.
)</p><p>A key question that impacts the science case for a potential orbiting mission to<br>Uranus or Neptune is how will more precise measurements of the gravitational field<br>better constrain either planet's interior density profile and composition.
<br>Surprisingly, there is yet no published answer to this question.
 Here, we present<br>new work that explores this issue, using a Bayesian framework that allows<br>exploration of a wide range of interior density profiles.
</p><p>Our approach, which builds off our previous work for Saturn (Movshovitz et al.
,<br>2020) and that of others  (e.
g.
Marley et al.
, 1995, Helled et al.
, 2011) takes a<br>relatively unbiased view of the interior structure by employing so-called<br>empirical density profiles.
A parameterization is applied to the density profiles<br>directly (via mathematical base functions) instead of to an assumed layered<br>composition (H/He, water, rocks).
While some of these empirical density profiles<br>may imply unrealistic compositions, they can also probe solutions that would be<br>missed by the standard layered-composition approach.
</p><p>Here we will present models of Uranus and Neptune constructed with this approach,<br>and ask two questions: 1) How large is the space of possible solutions today? 2)<br>How much will it be reduced should a future mission to Uranus and Neptune improve<br>the precision on their gravity field measurements by several orders of magnitude,<br>to the level now available for Jupiter and Saturn?</p>.

Related Results

A holistic aerosol model for Uranus and Neptune, including Dark Spots
A holistic aerosol model for Uranus and Neptune, including Dark Spots
<p>Previous studies of the reflectance spectra of Uranus and Neptune concentrated on individual, narrow wavelength regions, inferring solutions for the vertical struc...
Disentangling Primordial and Radiogenic Argon in Uranus and Neptune
Disentangling Primordial and Radiogenic Argon in Uranus and Neptune
Understanding the bulk compositions of Uranus and Neptune remains a major challenge because their interiors cannot be directly sampled and their atmospheric compositions are only w...
Modélisation atmosphérique d'Uranus et Neptune : circulation et structure thermique
Modélisation atmosphérique d'Uranus et Neptune : circulation et structure thermique
Les survols d'Uranus et de Neptune par Voyager 2 en 1986 et 1989 ont mis en évidence une intense circulation zonale et une activité météorologique inattendue. Caractérisée par un j...
Modelling the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune
Modelling the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune
The ice giants Uranus and Neptune are the only planets in the solar system with an unusual magnetic field morphology that deviates significantly from a dipole-dominated field obser...
Toward a Comprehensive Global Climate Model of Uranus: Radiative-Convective and Dynamical Simulations
Toward a Comprehensive Global Climate Model of Uranus: Radiative-Convective and Dynamical Simulations
Uranus is a unique world in the solar system, with its extreme obliquity and low apparent internal heat flux raising compelling atmospheric and climate dynamics questions. Observat...
Mission Analysis and Navigation Design for Uranus Atmospheric Flight
Mission Analysis and Navigation Design for Uranus Atmospheric Flight
We present a 6 DoF mission concept for in situ probing of Uranus’ atmosphere, consisting of two un-propelled gliders and one orbiter in continuous line of sight. We focus...
Gravity data reduction, Bouguer anomaly, and gravity disturbance
Gravity data reduction, Bouguer anomaly, and gravity disturbance
Each point on the earth has a gravity and gravity potential value. Surfaces formed by connecting points with equal gravity potential values are called equipotential surfaces or lev...
Composition gradients in Uranus, Neptune, and sub-Neptunes
Composition gradients in Uranus, Neptune, and sub-Neptunes
We advocate for a more agnostic approach to modelling the interiors of Uranus, Neptune, and sub-Neptune exoplanets. In this talk, we examine what can and cannot be inferred from th...

Back to Top