Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune

View through CrossRef
Uranus and Neptune are still poorly understood. Their gravitational fields, rotation periods, atmosphere dynamics, and internal structures are not well determined. In this paper, we present empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune where the density profiles are represented by polytropes. By using these models that are set to fit the planetary gravity field, we predict the higher order gravitational coefficients J6 and J8 for various assumed rotation periods, wind depths, and uncertainty of the low-order harmonics. We show that faster rotation and/or deep winds favour centrally concentrated density distributions. We demonstrate that an accurate determination of J6 or J8 with a relative uncertainty no larger than 10% could constrain wind depths of Uranus and Neptune. We also confirm that the Voyager II rotation periods are inconsistent with the measured shapes of Uranus and Neptune. We next demonstrate that more accurate determination of the gravity field can significantly reduce the possible range of internal structures. Finally, we suggest that an accurate measurement of the moment of inertia of Uranus and Neptune with a relative uncertainty of ∼ 1% and ∼ 0.1%, could constrain their rotation periods and depths of the winds, respectively.
Title: Empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune
Description:
Uranus and Neptune are still poorly understood.
Their gravitational fields, rotation periods, atmosphere dynamics, and internal structures are not well determined.
In this paper, we present empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune where the density profiles are represented by polytropes.
By using these models that are set to fit the planetary gravity field, we predict the higher order gravitational coefficients J6 and J8 for various assumed rotation periods, wind depths, and uncertainty of the low-order harmonics.
We show that faster rotation and/or deep winds favour centrally concentrated density distributions.
We demonstrate that an accurate determination of J6 or J8 with a relative uncertainty no larger than 10% could constrain wind depths of Uranus and Neptune.
We also confirm that the Voyager II rotation periods are inconsistent with the measured shapes of Uranus and Neptune.
We next demonstrate that more accurate determination of the gravity field can significantly reduce the possible range of internal structures.
Finally, we suggest that an accurate measurement of the moment of inertia of Uranus and Neptune with a relative uncertainty of ∼ 1% and ∼ 0.
1%, could constrain their rotation periods and depths of the winds, respectively.

Related Results

A holistic aerosol model for Uranus and Neptune, including Dark Spots
A holistic aerosol model for Uranus and Neptune, including Dark Spots
<p>Previous studies of the reflectance spectra of Uranus and Neptune concentrated on individual, narrow wavelength regions, inferring solutions for the vertical struc...
Toward a Comprehensive Global Climate Model of Uranus: Radiative-Convective and Dynamical Simulations
Toward a Comprehensive Global Climate Model of Uranus: Radiative-Convective and Dynamical Simulations
Uranus is a unique world in the solar system, with its extreme obliquity and low apparent internal heat flux raising compelling atmospheric and climate dynamics questions. Observat...
Mission Analysis and Navigation Design for Uranus Atmospheric Flight
Mission Analysis and Navigation Design for Uranus Atmospheric Flight
We present a 6 DoF mission concept for in situ probing of Uranus’ atmosphere, consisting of two un-propelled gliders and one orbiter in continuous line of sight. We focus...
Spectral Image Observations of Uranus’ Near-IR H2 Emission Spectrum using iSHELL
Spectral Image Observations of Uranus’ Near-IR H2 Emission Spectrum using iSHELL
Observations of Uranus’ Near-IR emission spectrum are of interest because they show that the upper atmosphere – the ionosphere and thermosphere – has been cooling since at least th...
Ice Giants
Ice Giants
Abstract Uranus and Neptune, the “ice giants” in the solar system, represent a fascinating class of planets. They are the outermost planets in the solar system wi...
Empirical Structure Models of Uranus and Neptune 
Empirical Structure Models of Uranus and Neptune 
<div class="page" title="Page 1"> <div class="section"> <div class="layoutArea&...
The promise and limitations of improved-accuracy gravity field measurements for Uranus and Neptune
The promise and limitations of improved-accuracy gravity field measurements for Uranus and Neptune
<p>Uranus and Neptune present unique challenges to planetary modelers. The<br>composition of the so-called ice giants is very uncertain, even more so th...
Are Uranus and Neptune really ice giants?
Are Uranus and Neptune really ice giants?
Although Uranus and Neptune are commonly classified as ice giants, their exact compositions remain uncertain. Recent studies on outer solar system objects challenge the traditional...

Back to Top