Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Mileva — a Dialogue About General Relativity as Regional

View through CrossRef
In this dialogue, Mileva and Albert start to talk about physics and its subject matter, the physical. They end up in a situation that permits causal dependence between separate ontological domains. In this possible world, they continue talking. First, they Socratically agree that the physical is physical and only physical. Then, they call the physical an ontologically homogeneous domain. They then generalise the principle that the physical is causally unaffected by anything non-physical, into the principle that ontologically homogeneous domains do not cause ontologically homogeneous domains. From a modern point of view talking about black hole singularities, they continue discussing the Chandrasekhar limit and the collapse of the physical laws as we know them. Mileva carries a burden and Albert stands up and carries it with her. The burden is an implication of the generalised principle. Relying on parsimony, only ontologically homogeneous domains are forbidden to cause ontologically homogeneous domains. This leaves the door open for ontologically heterogeneous domains to cause ontologically homogeneous domains. Also relying on parsimony, only ontologically homogeneous domains are forbidden to be caused by ontologically homogeneous domains and this allows ontologically heterogeneous domains to be caused by ontologically homogeneous domains. Ontologically heterogeneous domains, thus, are allowed to causally link ontologically homogeneous domains. Albert realises that the mathematical could qualify as an ontologically homogeneous domain and that the theoretical difficulties that are foreseen beyond the Chandrasekhar limit could be addressed by expanding physics into a context that contains also an ontologically heterogeneous domain. The theoretical difficulties beyond the Chandrasekhar limit would be due to an emergent mathematical-physical domain. Mileva concludes that Albert’s theory is not faulty but regional. A global theory would have to include the explanation of the mathematical-physical.
Qeios Ltd
Title: Mileva — a Dialogue About General Relativity as Regional
Description:
In this dialogue, Mileva and Albert start to talk about physics and its subject matter, the physical.
They end up in a situation that permits causal dependence between separate ontological domains.
In this possible world, they continue talking.
First, they Socratically agree that the physical is physical and only physical.
Then, they call the physical an ontologically homogeneous domain.
They then generalise the principle that the physical is causally unaffected by anything non-physical, into the principle that ontologically homogeneous domains do not cause ontologically homogeneous domains.
From a modern point of view talking about black hole singularities, they continue discussing the Chandrasekhar limit and the collapse of the physical laws as we know them.
Mileva carries a burden and Albert stands up and carries it with her.
The burden is an implication of the generalised principle.
Relying on parsimony, only ontologically homogeneous domains are forbidden to cause ontologically homogeneous domains.
This leaves the door open for ontologically heterogeneous domains to cause ontologically homogeneous domains.
Also relying on parsimony, only ontologically homogeneous domains are forbidden to be caused by ontologically homogeneous domains and this allows ontologically heterogeneous domains to be caused by ontologically homogeneous domains.
Ontologically heterogeneous domains, thus, are allowed to causally link ontologically homogeneous domains.
Albert realises that the mathematical could qualify as an ontologically homogeneous domain and that the theoretical difficulties that are foreseen beyond the Chandrasekhar limit could be addressed by expanding physics into a context that contains also an ontologically heterogeneous domain.
The theoretical difficulties beyond the Chandrasekhar limit would be due to an emergent mathematical-physical domain.
Mileva concludes that Albert’s theory is not faulty but regional.
A global theory would have to include the explanation of the mathematical-physical.

Related Results

JIT 2023 - Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos
JIT 2023 - Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos
Es un honor presentar este libro que compila los trabajos de investigación y desarrollo presentados en las Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos (JIT) 2023. Este evento s...
Unified Physics and Cosmology: the Theory of Everything
Unified Physics and Cosmology: the Theory of Everything
Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity appears to be incompatible because we are using the wrong model of the universe. Nature does not use two separate rule-books, but uses two ...
Unified Physics and Cosmology: the Theory of Everything
Unified Physics and Cosmology: the Theory of Everything
Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity appears to be incompatible because we are using the wrong model of the universe. Nature does not use two separate rule-books, but uses two ...
Limits of Special Relativity
Limits of Special Relativity
HIGHLIGHTS Special relativity has been successfully used to describe the behaviour of particles (Rossi & Hall, 1941), but there is no observation of special relativity in ...
XXV Encuentro Nacional y XVII Encuentro Internacional de Educación Matemática en Carreras de Ingeniería -EMCI
XXV Encuentro Nacional y XVII Encuentro Internacional de Educación Matemática en Carreras de Ingeniería -EMCI
El Encuentro de Educación Matemática en Carreras de Ingeniería (EMCI) se ha consolidado, a lo largo de sus veinticinco ediciones nacionales y diecisiete internacionales, como un es...
The case study by Slavenka Drakulić: Whose victim is Mileva Einstein?
The case study by Slavenka Drakulić: Whose victim is Mileva Einstein?
By embedding the "theory of sadness" phrase in the novel's title (Mileva Einstein, a theory of sadness), Slavenka Drakulić suggests that she sees her heroine's life as a paradigm o...
Limits of Special Relativity
Limits of Special Relativity
HIGHLIGHTS This paper is presenting an experiment based on Ehrenfest's paradox where an effect of special relativity was expected but not observed. The validity of special relativi...
The Special theory of relativity in different media(Ⅰ)
The Special theory of relativity in different media(Ⅰ)
Abstract In this paper, the special theory of relativity in different media is established, based on the fundamental invariant of the space-time four-dimensional space x2 +...

Back to Top