Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Harold Garfinkel and Edward Rose in the early years of ethnomethodology
View through CrossRef
AbstractThis article documents the beginning of the intellectual companionship between the founder of ethnomethodology, Harold Garfinkel, and Edward Rose, who is most often associated with his program of “ethno‐inquiries.” I present results from archival research focusing on the contacts and collaborations between Rose and Garfinkel in the years 1955–1965. First, I describe the review process for Rose and Felton's paper, submitted to the American Sociological Review in 1955, which Garfinkel reviewed and after Rose's rebuttal recommended for publication. The paper induced Garfinkel to write an extensive commentary that has remained unpublished. Second, I discuss the 1958 New Mexico conference sponsored by the Air Force, which was an opportunity for Rose and Garfinkel to work together on topics related to common‐sense knowledge and scientific knowledge. Third, I give an overview of the ethnomethodological conferences in 1962 and 1963, supported by an Air Force grant written collaboratively by Rose and Garfinkel. Here I focus primarily on Rose's research on “small languages,” which stimulated many discussions among the early ethnomethodologists. Rose's work and exchanges with Garfinkel demonstrate the former's affinity for miniaturization as a research approach and search for ways to empiricize topics of sociological theory in locally observable settings.
Title: Harold Garfinkel and Edward Rose in the early years of ethnomethodology
Description:
AbstractThis article documents the beginning of the intellectual companionship between the founder of ethnomethodology, Harold Garfinkel, and Edward Rose, who is most often associated with his program of “ethno‐inquiries.
” I present results from archival research focusing on the contacts and collaborations between Rose and Garfinkel in the years 1955–1965.
First, I describe the review process for Rose and Felton's paper, submitted to the American Sociological Review in 1955, which Garfinkel reviewed and after Rose's rebuttal recommended for publication.
The paper induced Garfinkel to write an extensive commentary that has remained unpublished.
Second, I discuss the 1958 New Mexico conference sponsored by the Air Force, which was an opportunity for Rose and Garfinkel to work together on topics related to common‐sense knowledge and scientific knowledge.
Third, I give an overview of the ethnomethodological conferences in 1962 and 1963, supported by an Air Force grant written collaboratively by Rose and Garfinkel.
Here I focus primarily on Rose's research on “small languages,” which stimulated many discussions among the early ethnomethodologists.
Rose's work and exchanges with Garfinkel demonstrate the former's affinity for miniaturization as a research approach and search for ways to empiricize topics of sociological theory in locally observable settings.
Related Results
Evaluation of Rosa Species Accessions for Resistance to Eriophyid Mites1
Evaluation of Rosa Species Accessions for Resistance to Eriophyid Mites1
Abstract
Rose rosette disease, caused by rose rosette virus (RRV), is an epidemic affecting nearly every rose cultivar in the United States. The only hosts for Phyllocoptes...
Occam’s Razor and the Challenges of Generalization in Ethnomethodology
Occam’s Razor and the Challenges of Generalization in Ethnomethodology
AbstractThis chapter addresses the relationship between ethnomethodology and the attempts to generalize observations in sociology. Garfinkel’s original program was sharply opposed ...
Types of New World Oedionychini Chapuis, 1875 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae, Alticitae) deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin
Types of New World Oedionychini Chapuis, 1875 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae, Alticitae) deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin
Type specimens of New World Oedionychini Chapuis, 1875, deposited in the collections of the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (MFNB) are examined and illustrated. Types assigned by Ludw...
Introduction to Harold Garfinkel's Ethnomethodological "Misreading" of Aron Gurwitsch on the Phenomenal Field
Introduction to Harold Garfinkel's Ethnomethodological "Misreading" of Aron Gurwitsch on the Phenomenal Field
AbstractThis article is the editors’ introduction to the transcript of a lecture that Harold Garfinkel delivered to a seminar in 1993. Garfinkel extensively discusses the relevance...
Using ethnomethodology as an approach to explore human–animal interaction
Using ethnomethodology as an approach to explore human–animal interaction
Abstract
Animal geographies is going through methodological change, moving towards a variety of methodological approaches that enliven inquiry into nonhuman anima...
On the disciplinary status of ethnomethodology
On the disciplinary status of ethnomethodology
The disciplinary status of ethnomethodology is uncertain. It has been presented as a radical internal reform movement, aimed at re-specifying the focus of sociology; as an ‘alterna...
Garfinkel and Goffman via Simmel: parallels and divergences
Garfinkel and Goffman via Simmel: parallels and divergences
This chapter compares the orientations of Garfinkel and Goffman. Their work is often regarded as similar, being concerned with the study of mundane patterns of social interaction. ...
Pelatihan Penggunaan Pendekatan Etnometodologi Islam dalam Riset Akuntansi
Pelatihan Penggunaan Pendekatan Etnometodologi Islam dalam Riset Akuntansi
Purpose: This training aims to provide understanding to Sharia accounting students regarding the use of the Islamic ethnomethodology approach in accounting research
Methodology/App...

