Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Phraseology of military-scientific discourse: Systemic and cognitive aspects
View through CrossRef
The article deals with military phraseology as a systemic linguistic phenomenon in the works of military theorists. The relevance of the research is conditioned by the necessity of complex analysis of professional phraseology in the conditions of international military cooperation development. In order to describe the specifics of phraseological units in military-scientific discourse, the objectives are to identify the repertoire and classify phraseological units according to structural and semantic features, to determine the functional specificity of different types of phraseological units, analyse the internal form as a key system-forming factor, investigate the main conceptual metaphors underlying military phraseology and their role in military discourse, identify and analyse the internal and external relations in the system of military phraseology. On the material of the works of outstanding theorists of military art (C. von Clausewitz, A.A. Svechin, M.N. Tukhachevsky, B.H. Liddell Hart, etc.) using the methods of corpus linguistics and cognitive analysis the types of military phraseologisms are identified and classified, their functional features are determined. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the integration of structural-semantic and cognitive approaches to the study of military phraseology. It is proved that the system-forming factor of military phraseology is the internal form, which is based on the metaphors of space, movement and organism. Internal and external systemic relations of military phraseological units are revealed, the phenomena of synonymy, antonymy and phraseological variation allow us to consider military phraseology as an integral system reflecting the specificity of conceptualisation of military reality.
The Business and Vocational Foreign Languages Teachers National Association
Title: Phraseology of military-scientific discourse: Systemic and cognitive aspects
Description:
The article deals with military phraseology as a systemic linguistic phenomenon in the works of military theorists.
The relevance of the research is conditioned by the necessity of complex analysis of professional phraseology in the conditions of international military cooperation development.
In order to describe the specifics of phraseological units in military-scientific discourse, the objectives are to identify the repertoire and classify phraseological units according to structural and semantic features, to determine the functional specificity of different types of phraseological units, analyse the internal form as a key system-forming factor, investigate the main conceptual metaphors underlying military phraseology and their role in military discourse, identify and analyse the internal and external relations in the system of military phraseology.
On the material of the works of outstanding theorists of military art (C.
von Clausewitz, A.
A.
Svechin, M.
N.
Tukhachevsky, B.
H.
Liddell Hart, etc.
) using the methods of corpus linguistics and cognitive analysis the types of military phraseologisms are identified and classified, their functional features are determined.
The scientific novelty of the study lies in the integration of structural-semantic and cognitive approaches to the study of military phraseology.
It is proved that the system-forming factor of military phraseology is the internal form, which is based on the metaphors of space, movement and organism.
Internal and external systemic relations of military phraseological units are revealed, the phenomena of synonymy, antonymy and phraseological variation allow us to consider military phraseology as an integral system reflecting the specificity of conceptualisation of military reality.
Related Results
Übersetzungsorientierte Didaktisierung juristischer Phraseologie
Übersetzungsorientierte Didaktisierung juristischer Phraseologie
Abstract
Legal phraseology is an essential component of legal language, and thus of legal communication, in both quantitative and qualitative terms. It is also one o...
Phytonymic Phraseology and Linguocultural Features of Paremiological Units
Phytonymic Phraseology and Linguocultural Features of Paremiological Units
The article comparatively examines phytonomic phraseology, forming a branch of onomastic phraseology of English and Azerbaijani languages. Internal classification of onomastic phra...
English Phraseology
English Phraseology
This book introduces students of English to one of the most fascinating and at the same time most difficult parts of language: Phraseology. Commonly known as phrases and idioms, ph...
FRAZEOLOGY IN DANSKOVĪTE’S PLAYS
FRAZEOLOGY IN DANSKOVĪTE’S PLAYS
Frequently used phrases in Danskovīte’ plays help to create a typical cultural landscape of Latgale, at the same time a wide range of stylistically expressive vocabulary, most ofte...
New taxonomic proposal for Chinese phraseology
New taxonomic proposal for Chinese phraseology
Over the years, the taxonomy of Chinese phraseology has been controversial. One of the main challenges for research in the field of phraseology is to discover how to classify all o...
The legal status of military command in Ukraine
The legal status of military command in Ukraine
The article is devoted to the study of the legal status of military command in Ukraine. The legal status of military command reflects its place in the system of public authorities ...
Discourse Coherence in Chinese
Discourse Coherence in Chinese
Discourse coherence is motivated by the need of the speaker to be understood, which is a psychological phenomenon reflected in the organization of natural discourse. It can be real...
DISCOURSE AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN THE CONCEPT OF SOCIOHUMANITARIAN KNOWLEDGE
DISCOURSE AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN THE CONCEPT OF SOCIOHUMANITARIAN KNOWLEDGE
Purpose of the study: The aim of the scientific work is to develop a new theory of interdisciplinary discourse based on social and humanitarian knowledge. Today, there are many int...

