Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Cheating interactions favor modularity in mutualistic networks

View through CrossRef
A fundamental fact about mutualisms is they are often explored by species that explore resources and services provided by individuals without providing any benefit. The role of these cheaters on the evolutionary dynamics of mutualisms has long been recognized, but cheaters may not only affect the species they explore. Because mutualisms form networks that often involve dozens to hundreds of species in a given site, indirect effects generated by cheaters may cascade through the network, reshaping trait evolution. Here, we study how harboring cheating interactions can influence coevolution in mutualistic networks. We combine a coevolutionary model, data on empirical networks of mutualisms, and numerical simulations to show that the higher frequency of cheating interactions can lead to the formation of groups of species phenotypically similar to each other but distinct from other groups of species, leading to higher trait disparity. The clustered trait patterns generated by cheaters, in turn, change the patterns of interaction in simulated networks, fostering the formation of modules of interacting species. Our results indicate that cheaters of mutualisms can contribute to generate phenotypic clusters in mutualisms, counteracting selection for convergence imposed by mutualistic patterns, and favoring the emergence of modules of interacting species.
Title: Cheating interactions favor modularity in mutualistic networks
Description:
A fundamental fact about mutualisms is they are often explored by species that explore resources and services provided by individuals without providing any benefit.
The role of these cheaters on the evolutionary dynamics of mutualisms has long been recognized, but cheaters may not only affect the species they explore.
Because mutualisms form networks that often involve dozens to hundreds of species in a given site, indirect effects generated by cheaters may cascade through the network, reshaping trait evolution.
Here, we study how harboring cheating interactions can influence coevolution in mutualistic networks.
We combine a coevolutionary model, data on empirical networks of mutualisms, and numerical simulations to show that the higher frequency of cheating interactions can lead to the formation of groups of species phenotypically similar to each other but distinct from other groups of species, leading to higher trait disparity.
The clustered trait patterns generated by cheaters, in turn, change the patterns of interaction in simulated networks, fostering the formation of modules of interacting species.
Our results indicate that cheaters of mutualisms can contribute to generate phenotypic clusters in mutualisms, counteracting selection for convergence imposed by mutualistic patterns, and favoring the emergence of modules of interacting species.

Related Results

Athletes’ Justification of Cheating in Sport: Relationship with Moral Disengagement in Sport and Personal Factors
Athletes’ Justification of Cheating in Sport: Relationship with Moral Disengagement in Sport and Personal Factors
Research background and hypothesis. The research focus is on university athletes’ justification of cheating in sport. We hypothesised that moral disengagement would be more linked ...
The Structure of Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks
The Structure of Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks
This chapter discusses the structure of mutualistic networks. Despite their apparent complexity, mutualistic networks show repeated, universal structural patterns independent of sp...
Detect Exam Cheating Pattern by Data Mining
Detect Exam Cheating Pattern by Data Mining
This aim of this project is to apply a series of pattern detection Data Mining algorithms to accurately identify cheating by one or more students during classroom test exams. JMP s...
Cheating on Unproctored Online Exams: Prevalence, Mitigation Measures, and Effects on Exam Performance
Cheating on Unproctored Online Exams: Prevalence, Mitigation Measures, and Effects on Exam Performance
As online courses become increasingly common at the college level, an ongoing concern is how to ensure academic integrity in the online environment. One area that has received part...
How cheating undermines the perceived value of justice in the workplace: the mediating effect of shame
How cheating undermines the perceived value of justice in the workplace: the mediating effect of shame
Scholars have devoted significant attention to investigating whenand whypeople cheat in organizations. However, there is increasing recognition that these behaviors can be difficul...
PERILAKU CHEATING MAHASISWA PSIKOLOGI ISLAM STAIN KEDIRI ANGKATAN 2013 DALAM UJIAN AKHIR SEMESTER
PERILAKU CHEATING MAHASISWA PSIKOLOGI ISLAM STAIN KEDIRI ANGKATAN 2013 DALAM UJIAN AKHIR SEMESTER
Perilaku cheating merupakan salah satu fenomena yang sering muncul di dalam dunia pendidikan. Cheating bisa diartikan sebagai bentuk perilaku moral yang menunjukkan ketidakjujuran ...
Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks
Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks
Mutualistic networks are formed when the interactions between two classes of species are mutually beneficial. They are important examples of cooperation shaped by evolution. Mutual...
Integration and Modularity in the Turtle Body Plan: Impacts on Disparity and Species Richness.
Integration and Modularity in the Turtle Body Plan: Impacts on Disparity and Species Richness.
Evolution is shaped by development, natural selection, and physiological limitations that bias the range of variation observed in organisms, influencing patterns of diversification...

Back to Top