Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

How cheating undermines the perceived value of justice in the workplace: the mediating effect of shame

View through CrossRef
Scholars have devoted significant attention to investigating whenand whypeople cheat in organizations. However, there is increasing recognition that these behaviors can be difficult to eradicate, which points to the importance of understanding the consequencesof cheating. Given that cheating violatesmoral norms that govern social relationships, it is critical to understand how cheating can influence social dynamics in the workplace. Drawing upon appraisal theories, we argue that cheating can have damaging consequences for individuals and their social relationships by eliciting shame. In turn, shame can reduce the extent to which individuals value receiving justice –a critical facilitator of social relationships in the workplace. We test our predictions across sixstudies using different samples and methodologies. In Study 1, we find that cheatingis negatively associated with the importance people place on others upholding justicefor them (i.e., overall justice values). In Studies 2-6, we demonstrate that shame plays a mediating role in this relationship, even in the presence of guilt and embarrassment.In Studies 3-5, we identify organizational identificationas a moderator and show that the effect of cheating on shame isstronger for those with high (versus low) identification. Theoretical implications include theimportance of identifying the outcomes of cheating for individuals within organizational contexts, understanding the functionaland dysfunctional consequences of shame, recognizing the differential effects of discrete emotions, and elucidating the role of identity within the context of cheating. We conclude with practical recommendations formanaging cheating behaviors and their outcomes in the workplace. Keywords: cheating, behavioral ethics, justice, shame, organizational identification
Ryerson University Library and Archives
Title: How cheating undermines the perceived value of justice in the workplace: the mediating effect of shame
Description:
Scholars have devoted significant attention to investigating whenand whypeople cheat in organizations.
However, there is increasing recognition that these behaviors can be difficult to eradicate, which points to the importance of understanding the consequencesof cheating.
Given that cheating violatesmoral norms that govern social relationships, it is critical to understand how cheating can influence social dynamics in the workplace.
Drawing upon appraisal theories, we argue that cheating can have damaging consequences for individuals and their social relationships by eliciting shame.
In turn, shame can reduce the extent to which individuals value receiving justice –a critical facilitator of social relationships in the workplace.
We test our predictions across sixstudies using different samples and methodologies.
In Study 1, we find that cheatingis negatively associated with the importance people place on others upholding justicefor them (i.
e.
, overall justice values).
In Studies 2-6, we demonstrate that shame plays a mediating role in this relationship, even in the presence of guilt and embarrassment.
In Studies 3-5, we identify organizational identificationas a moderator and show that the effect of cheating on shame isstronger for those with high (versus low) identification.
Theoretical implications include theimportance of identifying the outcomes of cheating for individuals within organizational contexts, understanding the functionaland dysfunctional consequences of shame, recognizing the differential effects of discrete emotions, and elucidating the role of identity within the context of cheating.
We conclude with practical recommendations formanaging cheating behaviors and their outcomes in the workplace.
Keywords: cheating, behavioral ethics, justice, shame, organizational identification.

Related Results

Athletes’ Justification of Cheating in Sport: Relationship with Moral Disengagement in Sport and Personal Factors
Athletes’ Justification of Cheating in Sport: Relationship with Moral Disengagement in Sport and Personal Factors
Research background and hypothesis. The research focus is on university athletes’ justification of cheating in sport. We hypothesised that moral disengagement would be more linked ...
Shame
Shame
The purpose of the researcher was to investigate shame. The independent variables were: age, gender, cultural background, religious preference, academic performance, alcohol statu...
Detect Exam Cheating Pattern by Data Mining
Detect Exam Cheating Pattern by Data Mining
This aim of this project is to apply a series of pattern detection Data Mining algorithms to accurately identify cheating by one or more students during classroom test exams. JMP s...
Cheating on Unproctored Online Exams: Prevalence, Mitigation Measures, and Effects on Exam Performance
Cheating on Unproctored Online Exams: Prevalence, Mitigation Measures, and Effects on Exam Performance
As online courses become increasingly common at the college level, an ongoing concern is how to ensure academic integrity in the online environment. One area that has received part...
A Comparative Study of Shame as Denoted by Hrī, Apatrāpya, and Xiuwuzhixin
A Comparative Study of Shame as Denoted by Hrī, Apatrāpya, and Xiuwuzhixin
Mencius’ concept of shame has emerged as a space of comparison between shame cultures in the East and West in cross-cultural research. However, comparative research on shame in Bud...
Conclusion: The Shame is (Not) Over
Conclusion: The Shame is (Not) Over
The Conclusion of Writing Shame reflects back on the key discussions of the book: the origins and manifestations of a contemporary ‘shame cu...
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Substantive justice is an idea of justice that seeks to present it comprehensively and completely in society. Substantive justice in this case does not only interpret the law as li...

Back to Top