Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Interlocking Multi-Twisted Wires Versus Interrupted Simple Sternal Wires for Closure of Median Sternotomy

View through CrossRef
Background: Although closure of a sternotomy incision is usually a simple procedure, failure to do so (sternal dehiscence) is a serious complication and is an independent factor that poses a high degree of morbidity or mortality after open heart surgery. Instability of the bone fragments can lead to complete sternal breakdown, sternal wound infection, and mediastinitis. The stainless-steel encircling wire used as either interrupted simple sutures or as figure of eight sutures is the current standard method of median sternotomy closure. Interlocking multi-twisted sternal wire closure is an alternative that provides rigid sternal fixation. We aim to identify the best method of sternal closure in order to implement it as a standardised protocol for our department. Methods: Two-hundred patients aged 18-70 years were undergoing cardiac surgeries at Ain Shams University hospitals. They were divided into two groups: Group I included 100 patients with sternal closure using simple wire, and group II included 100 patients with sternal closure using interlocking multi-twisted wires. The day 7, 1 month, and 3 months sternal instability, superficial wound infection, ventilation time, cross-clamp time, length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay were analyzed. Results: The incidence of sternal instability on the 7th day, 1 month, and 3 months was significantly higher in the simple wire closure group (P < 0.05). However, incidence of superficial wound infection, length of ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: The interlocking multi-twist is a safe, effective, and easily reproducible method for preventing sternal dehiscence.
Title: Interlocking Multi-Twisted Wires Versus Interrupted Simple Sternal Wires for Closure of Median Sternotomy
Description:
Background: Although closure of a sternotomy incision is usually a simple procedure, failure to do so (sternal dehiscence) is a serious complication and is an independent factor that poses a high degree of morbidity or mortality after open heart surgery.
Instability of the bone fragments can lead to complete sternal breakdown, sternal wound infection, and mediastinitis.
The stainless-steel encircling wire used as either interrupted simple sutures or as figure of eight sutures is the current standard method of median sternotomy closure.
Interlocking multi-twisted sternal wire closure is an alternative that provides rigid sternal fixation.
We aim to identify the best method of sternal closure in order to implement it as a standardised protocol for our department.
Methods: Two-hundred patients aged 18-70 years were undergoing cardiac surgeries at Ain Shams University hospitals.
They were divided into two groups: Group I included 100 patients with sternal closure using simple wire, and group II included 100 patients with sternal closure using interlocking multi-twisted wires.
The day 7, 1 month, and 3 months sternal instability, superficial wound infection, ventilation time, cross-clamp time, length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay were analyzed.
Results: The incidence of sternal instability on the 7th day, 1 month, and 3 months was significantly higher in the simple wire closure group (P < 0.
05).
However, incidence of superficial wound infection, length of ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion: The interlocking multi-twist is a safe, effective, and easily reproducible method for preventing sternal dehiscence.

Related Results

Improving Sternal Closure Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: Polyethylene Suture Tapes vs. Steel Wires
Improving Sternal Closure Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: Polyethylene Suture Tapes vs. Steel Wires
Background: Steel wires are often inadequate for sternal closure for patients at high risk of sternal complications. This study compares a novel sternal closure system to conventio...
Comparative study between aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy versus mini-sternotomy
Comparative study between aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy versus mini-sternotomy
Background: The superiority of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) over the standard approach is the subject of ongoing research. The aim of this study was to compare...
Application of new rigid sternal plates and prediction of sternal dehiscence in high-risk patients
Application of new rigid sternal plates and prediction of sternal dehiscence in high-risk patients
Background: Sternal dehiscence is a serious complication of cardiac surgery that has been a clinically intractable problem. The study aimed to explore the advanta...
Mini-sternotomy versuMini-sternotomy versuss conventional sternotomy in aortic valve replacement surgery; A comparative study
Mini-sternotomy versuMini-sternotomy versuss conventional sternotomy in aortic valve replacement surgery; A comparative study
Objectives: To assess safety; efficacy and efficiency of mini-sternotomy in aortic valve replacement in comparison to conventional sternotomy on short term follow up.Methods: This ...

Back to Top