Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Efficacy of surgical techniques and factors affecting residual stone rate in the treatment of kidney stones

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate, the efficacy of surgical methods and the factors affecting the residual stone rate by scrutinizing retrospectively the patients who had undergone renal stone surgery. Material and methods: Records of 109 cases of kidney stones who had been surgically treated between January 2010, and July 2013 were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups in terms of surgical treatment; open stone surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Patients’ history, physical examination, biochemical and radiological images and operative and postoperative data were recorded. Results: The patients had undergone PNL (n=74; 67.9%), RIRS (n=22;20.2%), and open renal surgery (n=13; 11.9%). The mean and median ages of the patients were 46±9, 41 (21-75) and, 42 (23-67) years, respectively. The mean stone burden was 2.6±0.7 cm2 in the PNL, 1.4±0.1 cm2 in the RIRS, and 3.1±0.9 cm2 in the open surgery groups. The mean operative times were 126±24 min in the PNL group, 72±12 min in the RIRS group and 82±22 min in the open surgery group. The duration of hospitalisation was 3.1±0.2 days, 1.2±0.3 days and 3.4±1.1 days respectively. While the RIRS group did not need blood transfusion, in the PNL group blood transfusions were given in the PNL (n=18), and open surgery (n=2) groups. Residual stones were detected in the PNL (n=22), open surgery (n=2), and RIRS (n=5) groups. Conclusion: PNL and RIRS have been seen as safe and effective methods in our self application too. However, it should not be forgotten that as a basical method, open surgery may be needed in cases of necessity.
Title: Efficacy of surgical techniques and factors affecting residual stone rate in the treatment of kidney stones
Description:
Abstract Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate, the efficacy of surgical methods and the factors affecting the residual stone rate by scrutinizing retrospectively the patients who had undergone renal stone surgery.
Material and methods: Records of 109 cases of kidney stones who had been surgically treated between January 2010, and July 2013 were reviewed.
Patients were divided into three groups in terms of surgical treatment; open stone surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).
Patients’ history, physical examination, biochemical and radiological images and operative and postoperative data were recorded.
Results: The patients had undergone PNL (n=74; 67.
9%), RIRS (n=22;20.
2%), and open renal surgery (n=13; 11.
9%).
The mean and median ages of the patients were 46±9, 41 (21-75) and, 42 (23-67) years, respectively.
The mean stone burden was 2.
6±0.
7 cm2 in the PNL, 1.
4±0.
1 cm2 in the RIRS, and 3.
1±0.
9 cm2 in the open surgery groups.
The mean operative times were 126±24 min in the PNL group, 72±12 min in the RIRS group and 82±22 min in the open surgery group.
The duration of hospitalisation was 3.
1±0.
2 days, 1.
2±0.
3 days and 3.
4±1.
1 days respectively.
While the RIRS group did not need blood transfusion, in the PNL group blood transfusions were given in the PNL (n=18), and open surgery (n=2) groups.
Residual stones were detected in the PNL (n=22), open surgery (n=2), and RIRS (n=5) groups.
Conclusion: PNL and RIRS have been seen as safe and effective methods in our self application too.
However, it should not be forgotten that as a basical method, open surgery may be needed in cases of necessity.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
COMPARISON OF STONE FREE RATE OF STAGHORN STONE, RENAL PELVIC STONE, AND INFERIOR CALYX STONE FOLLOWING PCNL
COMPARISON OF STONE FREE RATE OF STAGHORN STONE, RENAL PELVIC STONE, AND INFERIOR CALYX STONE FOLLOWING PCNL
Objective: To compare the stone free rates on patients with staghorn, renal pelvic, and inferior calyx stones with stone burden < 20 mm, 21-30 mm, and > 30 mm following percu...
The effect of skin-to-stone distance on success in renal pelvis stones treated with ESWL
The effect of skin-to-stone distance on success in renal pelvis stones treated with ESWL
Our study aimed to investigate the effect of stone load, skin-to-stone distance, and stone density Hounsfield Unit (HU) measured in unenhanced computed tomography on the success of...
Association between Pulp Stone and Renal Stones: A Case-Control Study
Association between Pulp Stone and Renal Stones: A Case-Control Study
Background: Pulp stones refer to degenerative alterations occurring within the pulp tissue. Pulp stones are common issue for endodontic treatment. Literature is controversial about...
Kidney stones and oxidative stress. Types of papillary renal calculi
Kidney stones and oxidative stress. Types of papillary renal calculi
Abstract Reactive oxygen species can promote the formation of kidney stones, and this process requires the participation of cells associated with the renal papill...
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Urolithiasis is a prevailing urological condition, with ureteric stones affecting around 22% of cases, mostly causing severe pain and other complications. Surveillance, medical the...
Kidney stones and dietary intake in adults: a population-based study in southwest Iran
Kidney stones and dietary intake in adults: a population-based study in southwest Iran
Abstract Background The prevalence of kidney stones is on the rise globally. Several risk factors, including lifestyle, contribute to the formation ...

Back to Top