Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

COMPARISON OF STONE FREE RATE OF STAGHORN STONE, RENAL PELVIC STONE, AND INFERIOR CALYX STONE FOLLOWING PCNL

View through CrossRef
Objective: To compare the stone free rates on patients with staghorn, renal pelvic, and inferior calyx stones with stone burden < 20 mm, 21-30 mm, and > 30 mm following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital Jakarta. Material & methods: The data were collected retrospectively from PCNL medical records in Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital Jakarta between January 2000 and March 2011. Six hundred and twenty-three patients with 651 kidney stones underwent PCNL. The inclusion criteria were staghorn stones, renal pelvic stone, and inferior calyx stone. All cases outside these three criteria and incomplete data were excluded. Stone free status was defined as no residual fragment on radiography or ultrasonography. Results: As many as 364 kidney stones from 344 patients were included, with 47.8% cases of staghorn stones, 31.9% cases of renal pelvic stones, and 20.3% cases of inferior calyx stones. Overall, 273 (75%) cases were defined as stone free. In group < 20 mm, 4 staghorn stones (100%), 18 renal pelvic stones (81.8%), and 34 inferior calyx stones (94.4%) were cleared (p = 0.811). In group 21-30 mm, 20 staghorn stones (95.2%), 52 renal pelvic stones (91.2%), and 26 inferior calyx stones (92.9%) were cleared (p = 1.000). In group > 30 mm, 83 staghorn stones (55.7%), 28 renal pelvic stones (75.7%), and 8 inferior calyx stones (80%) were cleared (p = 0.037). Conclusion: PCNL is an important tool for treating various kinds and sizes of kidney stones with high stone free rate.
Title: COMPARISON OF STONE FREE RATE OF STAGHORN STONE, RENAL PELVIC STONE, AND INFERIOR CALYX STONE FOLLOWING PCNL
Description:
Objective: To compare the stone free rates on patients with staghorn, renal pelvic, and inferior calyx stones with stone burden < 20 mm, 21-30 mm, and > 30 mm following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital Jakarta.
Material & methods: The data were collected retrospectively from PCNL medical records in Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital Jakarta between January 2000 and March 2011.
Six hundred and twenty-three patients with 651 kidney stones underwent PCNL.
The inclusion criteria were staghorn stones, renal pelvic stone, and inferior calyx stone.
All cases outside these three criteria and incomplete data were excluded.
Stone free status was defined as no residual fragment on radiography or ultrasonography.
Results: As many as 364 kidney stones from 344 patients were included, with 47.
8% cases of staghorn stones, 31.
9% cases of renal pelvic stones, and 20.
3% cases of inferior calyx stones.
Overall, 273 (75%) cases were defined as stone free.
In group < 20 mm, 4 staghorn stones (100%), 18 renal pelvic stones (81.
8%), and 34 inferior calyx stones (94.
4%) were cleared (p = 0.
811).
In group 21-30 mm, 20 staghorn stones (95.
2%), 52 renal pelvic stones (91.
2%), and 26 inferior calyx stones (92.
9%) were cleared (p = 1.
000).
In group > 30 mm, 83 staghorn stones (55.
7%), 28 renal pelvic stones (75.
7%), and 8 inferior calyx stones (80%) were cleared (p = 0.
037).
Conclusion: PCNL is an important tool for treating various kinds and sizes of kidney stones with high stone free rate.

Related Results

Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
AbstractObjectivesTo determine whether the outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UG-PCNL), an alternative to traditional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephr...
Modified supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi.
Modified supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi.
Objective: To find out the best position in the practice of PCNL. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Urology, AFIU, Rawalpindi. Period: August 2020 t...
Supracostal Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a safe and effective approach: a clinical audit
Supracostal Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a safe and effective approach: a clinical audit
Objective: To emphasize on safety principles through anatomic approach in Supracostal PCNL Methods: Data of patients who underwent PCNL from June 2004 to August 2014 from The Kidne...
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine versus Prone Position in Tertiary Hospital in Mysore: A Prospective Cohort Study
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine versus Prone Position in Tertiary Hospital in Mysore: A Prospective Cohort Study
Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a procedure of choice for large renal calculi. It is a common urological procedure. PCNL can be performed in various positions....
(087) Why Should Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy be Included in Treatment of Vestibulodynia?
(087) Why Should Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy be Included in Treatment of Vestibulodynia?
Abstract Introduction Vestibulodynia, vulvar pain localized to the vestibule without an identifiable cause, has a multifactorial...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...

Back to Top