Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Modified supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi.

View through CrossRef
Objective: To find out the best position in the practice of PCNL. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Urology, AFIU, Rawalpindi. Period: August 2020 to January 2021. Methods: A total of 164 adult (20-70 years) patients of either gender undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy for single renal calculus with size >20 mm through single puncture access were included. Patients with staghorn stone, recurrent stone, PUJO, pyonephrosis and bleeding disorder were excluded. In group A patients, modified supine PCNL was done while in group B patients, prone PCNL was done. Operative time was noted by the researcher himself with the help of stopwatch. All patients were followed by researcher himself for assessment of complications and drop in hemoglobin levels. Postoperatively patients were evaluated for stone free rate. Hospital stay was noted. Results: In my study, stone free rate after supine PCNL was found in 66 (80.49%) patients and after prone PCNL in 45 (54.88%) patients (p-value = 0.0001). Complications rate after modified supine PCNL was found to be 8.54% patients and after prone PCNL was 20.73% (p-value = 0.027). In my study, mean operative time in supine PCNL was 86.12 ± 9.33 minutes and in prone PCNL was 110.80 ± 13.35 minutes. Mean hospital stay in supine PCNL was 1.77 ± 0.79 days and in prone PCNL was 2.49 ± 0.81 days. Mean drop in hemoglobin levels was 0.82 ± 0.24 g/dl vs 1.77 ± 0.24 g/dl respectively (p-value = 0.0001). Conclusion: This study concluded that mean operative time, hospital stay, drop in hemoglobin and complications are less while stone free rate is high after modified supine PCNL as compared to prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Title: Modified supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi.
Description:
Objective: To find out the best position in the practice of PCNL.
Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Setting: Department of Urology, AFIU, Rawalpindi.
Period: August 2020 to January 2021.
Methods: A total of 164 adult (20-70 years) patients of either gender undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy for single renal calculus with size >20 mm through single puncture access were included.
Patients with staghorn stone, recurrent stone, PUJO, pyonephrosis and bleeding disorder were excluded.
In group A patients, modified supine PCNL was done while in group B patients, prone PCNL was done.
Operative time was noted by the researcher himself with the help of stopwatch.
All patients were followed by researcher himself for assessment of complications and drop in hemoglobin levels.
Postoperatively patients were evaluated for stone free rate.
Hospital stay was noted.
Results: In my study, stone free rate after supine PCNL was found in 66 (80.
49%) patients and after prone PCNL in 45 (54.
88%) patients (p-value = 0.
0001).
Complications rate after modified supine PCNL was found to be 8.
54% patients and after prone PCNL was 20.
73% (p-value = 0.
027).
In my study, mean operative time in supine PCNL was 86.
12 ± 9.
33 minutes and in prone PCNL was 110.
80 ± 13.
35 minutes.
Mean hospital stay in supine PCNL was 1.
77 ± 0.
79 days and in prone PCNL was 2.
49 ± 0.
81 days.
Mean drop in hemoglobin levels was 0.
82 ± 0.
24 g/dl vs 1.
77 ± 0.
24 g/dl respectively (p-value = 0.
0001).
Conclusion: This study concluded that mean operative time, hospital stay, drop in hemoglobin and complications are less while stone free rate is high after modified supine PCNL as compared to prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Related Results

COMPARISON BETWEEN SUPINE POSITION VERSUS PRONE POSITION IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A SINGLE CENTERED ANALYSIS OF 623 CASES
COMPARISON BETWEEN SUPINE POSITION VERSUS PRONE POSITION IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A SINGLE CENTERED ANALYSIS OF 623 CASES
Background: The ideal urological method for treating complex, large renal calculi is Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Its instruments, surgical techniques, and positions have a...
Complications of Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Complications of Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Objective: To compare grade I complication as per Clavien-Dindo classification in patients undergoing standard (with tube) verses tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Study desig...
Is supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy an alternative to prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Our experience at a tertiary care center
Is supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy an alternative to prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Our experience at a tertiary care center
Background: Majority of urologists prefer the usual prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) but due to various disadvantages of prone PCNL, several alternative posit...
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine versus Prone Position in Tertiary Hospital in Mysore: A Prospective Cohort Study
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine versus Prone Position in Tertiary Hospital in Mysore: A Prospective Cohort Study
Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a procedure of choice for large renal calculi. It is a common urological procedure. PCNL can be performed in various positions....
Radial nerve palsy following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Radial nerve palsy following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Injury to nerve is a well known complication of shoulder subluxation. Radial nerve injury is most commonly seen during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in lateral decubitus region. If ...
Efficacy of Ultrasound in Detecting Renal Calculi Keeping Non-Enhanced Computed Tomography as a Reference Standard
Efficacy of Ultrasound in Detecting Renal Calculi Keeping Non-Enhanced Computed Tomography as a Reference Standard
Background: Renal calculi, are a prevalent health issue afflicting 10 to 15% of the world's population. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare ultrasonography and c...

Back to Top