Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A comparative evaluation of two decompression procedures for technical diving using inflammatory responses: compartmental versus ratio deco
View through CrossRef
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare two decompression procedures commonly adopted by technical divers: the ZH-L16 algorithm modified by 30/85 gradient factors (compartmental decompression model, CDM) versus the ‘ratio decompression strategy’ (RDS). The comparison was based on an analysis of changes in diver circulating inflammatory profiles caused by decompression from a single dive.
Methods: Fifty-one technical divers performed a single trimix dive to 50 metres’ sea water (msw) for 25 minutes followed by enriched air (EAN50) and oxygen decompression. Twenty-three divers decompressed according to a CDM schedule and 28 divers decompressed according to a RDS schedule. Peripheral blood for detection of inflammatory markers was collected before and 90 min after diving. Venous gas emboli were measured 30 min after diving using 2D echocardiography. Matched groups of 23 recreational divers (dive to 30 msw; 25 min) and 25 swimmers were also enrolled as control groups to assess the effects of decompression from a standard air dive or of exercise alone on the inflammatory profile.
Results: Echocardiography at the single 30 min observation post dive showed no significant differences between the two decompression procedures. Divers adopting the RDS showed a worsening of post-dive inflammatory profile compared to the CDM group, with significant increases in circulating chemokines CCL2 (P = 0.001) and CCL5 (P = 0.006) levels. There was no increase in chemokines following the CDM decompression. The air scuba group also showed a statistically significant increase in CCL2 (P < 0.001) and CCL5 (P = 0.003) levels post dive. No cases of decompression sickness occurred. Conclusion: The ratio deco strategy did not confer any benefit in terms of bubbles but showed the disadvantage of increased decompression-associated secretion of inflammatory chemokines involved in the development of vascular damage.
Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine Journal
Title: A comparative evaluation of two decompression procedures for technical diving using inflammatory responses: compartmental versus ratio deco
Description:
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare two decompression procedures commonly adopted by technical divers: the ZH-L16 algorithm modified by 30/85 gradient factors (compartmental decompression model, CDM) versus the ‘ratio decompression strategy’ (RDS).
The comparison was based on an analysis of changes in diver circulating inflammatory profiles caused by decompression from a single dive.
Methods: Fifty-one technical divers performed a single trimix dive to 50 metres’ sea water (msw) for 25 minutes followed by enriched air (EAN50) and oxygen decompression.
Twenty-three divers decompressed according to a CDM schedule and 28 divers decompressed according to a RDS schedule.
Peripheral blood for detection of inflammatory markers was collected before and 90 min after diving.
Venous gas emboli were measured 30 min after diving using 2D echocardiography.
Matched groups of 23 recreational divers (dive to 30 msw; 25 min) and 25 swimmers were also enrolled as control groups to assess the effects of decompression from a standard air dive or of exercise alone on the inflammatory profile.
Results: Echocardiography at the single 30 min observation post dive showed no significant differences between the two decompression procedures.
Divers adopting the RDS showed a worsening of post-dive inflammatory profile compared to the CDM group, with significant increases in circulating chemokines CCL2 (P = 0.
001) and CCL5 (P = 0.
006) levels.
There was no increase in chemokines following the CDM decompression.
The air scuba group also showed a statistically significant increase in CCL2 (P < 0.
001) and CCL5 (P = 0.
003) levels post dive.
No cases of decompression sickness occurred.
Conclusion: The ratio deco strategy did not confer any benefit in terms of bubbles but showed the disadvantage of increased decompression-associated secretion of inflammatory chemokines involved in the development of vascular damage.
Related Results
Decompression at 1.3 versus 1.6 bar and Nitrogen Elimination and Venous Gas Emboli: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Decompression at 1.3 versus 1.6 bar and Nitrogen Elimination and Venous Gas Emboli: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Plogmark O, Hjelte C, Olsson M, Ekström M, Frånberg O. Decompression at 1.3 versus 1.6 bar and Nitrogen Elimination and Venous Gas Emboli: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Undersea H...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Marine Operations For Platform Maintenance And Repair
Marine Operations For Platform Maintenance And Repair
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the history of the development of submarine and diving support vessels in the North Sea and an analysis of future trends bas...
Early decompression promotes motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury in rats with chronic cervical spinal cord compression
Early decompression promotes motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury in rats with chronic cervical spinal cord compression
Abstract
BackgroundThe number of elderly patients with spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormalities (SCIWORA) has been increasing in recent years and is true of mo...
Early decompression promotes motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury in rats with chronic cervical spinal cord compression
Early decompression promotes motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury in rats with chronic cervical spinal cord compression
AbstractThe number of elderly patients with spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormalities (SCIWORA) has been increasing in recent years and common of most cervical spinal c...
Phrenic Nerve Block for Management of Post-Thoracic Outlet Decompression Cough: A Case Report and Literature Review
Phrenic Nerve Block for Management of Post-Thoracic Outlet Decompression Cough: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Thoracic outlet syndrome is a group of disorders arising from compressive forces on the neurovascular bundle in that region due to different etiologies. This...
Chain of events analysis in diving accidents treated by the Royal Netherlands Navy 1966–2023
Chain of events analysis in diving accidents treated by the Royal Netherlands Navy 1966–2023
Introduction: Diving injuries are influenced by a multitude of factors. Literature analysing the full chain of events in diving accidents influencing the occurrence of diving injur...
Manned validation of a US Navy Diving Manual, Revision 7, VVal-79 schedule for short bottom time, deep air decompression diving
Manned validation of a US Navy Diving Manual, Revision 7, VVal-79 schedule for short bottom time, deep air decompression diving
Introduction: The US Navy air decompression table was promulgated in 2008, and a revised version, calculated with the VVal-79 Thalmann algorithm, was promulgated in 2016. The Swedi...

