Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Principles for the Design, Validation, and Acceptance of Decompression Procedures
View through CrossRef
Imbert JP, Sidali A, Butler A, Lucas J. Principles for the Design, Validation, and Acceptance of
Decompression Procedures. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2026 Second Quarter; 53(2):349-362.
Introduction: The 1987 UHMS Workshop on the Validation of Decompression Tables provided standards
for the design, testing, and acceptance of decompression tables. Forty years later, research funding has
become scarce, and diving companies no longer receive support from universities and Navy research
centers. Companies build on their experience and safety culture to improve existing decompression
procedures. We list principles and propose guidelines for these internal developments.
Principles: Editing decompression tables is a technical activity that aims to provide a practical solution to
an immediate operational problem. It relies heavily on current scientific knowledge and experience and
on recognized design principles, validation protocols, and acceptance criteria.
Validation: Validating decompression procedures fits into the company's Health and Safety management
system. Today, decompression tables result from a risk assessment and are presented as a mitigation
measure against decompression risks. Management of Change offers a step-by-step approach compatible
with the UHMS recommendation for improving existing procedures.
Acceptance: Accepting decompression procedures is based on the definition and measurements of
relevant endpoints used as acceptance criteria. Endpoints have evolved from DCS incidence to the larger
concept of decompression stress. We highlight the importance of dive monitoring in documenting
procedure performances and supporting the acceptance decision.
Discussion: We conclude that Management of Change can be used by diving companies to develop
new or revised decompression procedures, as a complement to the 1987 UHMS recommendations. We
recommend that the process be detailed in the company documentation to keep the lessons learned and
inform operational personnel.
Keywords: decompression tables; decompression sickness; diving at work; risk assessment; risk
management
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS)
Title: Principles for the Design, Validation, and Acceptance of Decompression Procedures
Description:
Imbert JP, Sidali A, Butler A, Lucas J.
Principles for the Design, Validation, and Acceptance of
Decompression Procedures.
Undersea Hyperb Med.
2026 Second Quarter; 53(2):349-362.
Introduction: The 1987 UHMS Workshop on the Validation of Decompression Tables provided standards
for the design, testing, and acceptance of decompression tables.
Forty years later, research funding has
become scarce, and diving companies no longer receive support from universities and Navy research
centers.
Companies build on their experience and safety culture to improve existing decompression
procedures.
We list principles and propose guidelines for these internal developments.
Principles: Editing decompression tables is a technical activity that aims to provide a practical solution to
an immediate operational problem.
It relies heavily on current scientific knowledge and experience and
on recognized design principles, validation protocols, and acceptance criteria.
Validation: Validating decompression procedures fits into the company's Health and Safety management
system.
Today, decompression tables result from a risk assessment and are presented as a mitigation
measure against decompression risks.
Management of Change offers a step-by-step approach compatible
with the UHMS recommendation for improving existing procedures.
Acceptance: Accepting decompression procedures is based on the definition and measurements of
relevant endpoints used as acceptance criteria.
Endpoints have evolved from DCS incidence to the larger
concept of decompression stress.
We highlight the importance of dive monitoring in documenting
procedure performances and supporting the acceptance decision.
Discussion: We conclude that Management of Change can be used by diving companies to develop
new or revised decompression procedures, as a complement to the 1987 UHMS recommendations.
We
recommend that the process be detailed in the company documentation to keep the lessons learned and
inform operational personnel.
Keywords: decompression tables; decompression sickness; diving at work; risk assessment; risk
management.
Related Results
Early decompression promotes motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury in rats with chronic cervical spinal cord compression
Early decompression promotes motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury in rats with chronic cervical spinal cord compression
Abstract
BackgroundThe number of elderly patients with spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormalities (SCIWORA) has been increasing in recent years and is true of mo...
Early decompression promotes motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury in rats with chronic cervical spinal cord compression
Early decompression promotes motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury in rats with chronic cervical spinal cord compression
AbstractThe number of elderly patients with spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormalities (SCIWORA) has been increasing in recent years and common of most cervical spinal c...
Phrenic Nerve Block for Management of Post-Thoracic Outlet Decompression Cough: A Case Report and Literature Review
Phrenic Nerve Block for Management of Post-Thoracic Outlet Decompression Cough: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Thoracic outlet syndrome is a group of disorders arising from compressive forces on the neurovascular bundle in that region due to different etiologies. This...
Follow-Up Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Non-surgical Spinal Decompression Therapy for Acute Herniated Intervertebral Disc: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
Follow-Up Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Non-surgical Spinal Decompression Therapy for Acute Herniated Intervertebral Disc: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
Abstract
BackgroundNon-surgical spinal decompression therapy has been used for treating the lumbosacral herniated intervertebral disc as one of the conservative treatments....
A comparative evaluation of two decompression procedures for technical diving using inflammatory responses: compartmental versus ratio deco
A comparative evaluation of two decompression procedures for technical diving using inflammatory responses: compartmental versus ratio deco
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare two decompression procedures commonly adopted by technical divers: the ZH-L16 algorithm modified by 30/85 gradient factors (compa...
Clinical value of MRI laminar line-simulated decompression for predicting the efficacy of cervical laminoplasty
Clinical value of MRI laminar line-simulated decompression for predicting the efficacy of cervical laminoplasty
Abstract
Aim
The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) laminar line (LL)-simulated decompression for predicting the ...
Ceiling-controlled versus staged decompression: comparison between decompression duration and tissue tensions
Ceiling-controlled versus staged decompression: comparison between decompression duration and tissue tensions
Introduction: In dissolved gas decompression algorithms, the ceiling is the depth at which the dissolved gas pressure in at least one tissue equals the maximum tolerated value defi...
Successful Criteria for Indirect Decompression With Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Successful Criteria for Indirect Decompression With Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Objective: No consensus criteria have been established regarding ideal candidates for indirect decompression with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and contributing factors o...

