Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract 13915: Comparison of Proteomic CV Risk to Established ASCVD 10-year Risk Decision Points
View through CrossRef
Introduction:
The ASCVD pooled cohort equation (PCE) is well-established for CV risk assessment. Decision points for determining treatment plans are low, intermediate and high risk over 10 years, however this approach over and underestimates risk in certain subgroups. The validated CV Risk SomaSignal® Test (SST) provides 4-year risk probability of MACE allowing for timely assessment of risk, but the shorter timescale makes comparison to 10-year PCE risk less intuitive.
Hypothesis:
Using a previously described metacohort (n=5,575) of patients with increased CV risk, we hypothesized that PCE would stratify patients differently than the CV Risk SST, and that CV Risk score scaled to 10 years would yield an improved net reclassification index (NRI).
Methods:
CV Risk SST and PCE scores were calculated on metacohort plasma samples. CV risk score was scaled to 10 years by parameterizing the model for a 10-year score, and then calculating a quadratic equation for the conversion. CV risk score was stratified by four established risk bins, whereas the PCE was stratified similarly using <7.5%, 7.5%-15%, 15%-20%, and > 20% risks based on literature and practice-derived cutoffs. Event rates were compared between scores, and NRI was calculated.
Results:
We observed total NRI of 11.4% for the 10-year CV Risk SST vs. PCE, with up-classification (positive NRI=83.7%) mitigating down-classification (negative NRI=-0.723). Event rates for the high-risk group in the CV Risk test were higher than the PCE, and lower in the low-risk group (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
The CV Risk SST stratifies patients by identifying low- and high-risk groups using thresholds that are more discriminatory than low-risk and high-risk thresholds in the PCE. For comparison, the CV risk SST can be scaled to 10-year risk, with CV risk SST having a positive NRI for identifying MACE. This reclassification can allow targeted therapies in patients at greater risk and use of non-pharmacological therapies in the low-risk patients.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Abstract 13915: Comparison of Proteomic CV Risk to Established ASCVD 10-year Risk Decision Points
Description:
Introduction:
The ASCVD pooled cohort equation (PCE) is well-established for CV risk assessment.
Decision points for determining treatment plans are low, intermediate and high risk over 10 years, however this approach over and underestimates risk in certain subgroups.
The validated CV Risk SomaSignal® Test (SST) provides 4-year risk probability of MACE allowing for timely assessment of risk, but the shorter timescale makes comparison to 10-year PCE risk less intuitive.
Hypothesis:
Using a previously described metacohort (n=5,575) of patients with increased CV risk, we hypothesized that PCE would stratify patients differently than the CV Risk SST, and that CV Risk score scaled to 10 years would yield an improved net reclassification index (NRI).
Methods:
CV Risk SST and PCE scores were calculated on metacohort plasma samples.
CV risk score was scaled to 10 years by parameterizing the model for a 10-year score, and then calculating a quadratic equation for the conversion.
CV risk score was stratified by four established risk bins, whereas the PCE was stratified similarly using <7.
5%, 7.
5%-15%, 15%-20%, and > 20% risks based on literature and practice-derived cutoffs.
Event rates were compared between scores, and NRI was calculated.
Results:
We observed total NRI of 11.
4% for the 10-year CV Risk SST vs.
PCE, with up-classification (positive NRI=83.
7%) mitigating down-classification (negative NRI=-0.
723).
Event rates for the high-risk group in the CV Risk test were higher than the PCE, and lower in the low-risk group (p < 0.
05).
Conclusions:
The CV Risk SST stratifies patients by identifying low- and high-risk groups using thresholds that are more discriminatory than low-risk and high-risk thresholds in the PCE.
For comparison, the CV risk SST can be scaled to 10-year risk, with CV risk SST having a positive NRI for identifying MACE.
This reclassification can allow targeted therapies in patients at greater risk and use of non-pharmacological therapies in the low-risk patients.
Related Results
1478-P: Polygenic Risk Score Predicts Incident Cardiovascular Disease in People with Diabetes at Borderline or Intermediate 10-Year ASCVD Risk
1478-P: Polygenic Risk Score Predicts Incident Cardiovascular Disease in People with Diabetes at Borderline or Intermediate 10-Year ASCVD Risk
People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) of 20% or higher are recommended for intense lipid management. However, the role of gen...
LDL-C reduction and residual cardiovascular risk in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a matched cohort study in South Wales
LDL-C reduction and residual cardiovascular risk in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a matched cohort study in South Wales
Abstract
Background
Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is characterized by lifelong elevated LDL-C and inc...
Abstract 4366969: Adding a polygenic risk score to the PREVENT clinical risk tool significantly improves cardiovascular risk prediction
Abstract 4366969: Adding a polygenic risk score to the PREVENT clinical risk tool significantly improves cardiovascular risk prediction
Introduction:
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) has many well-established risk factors; clinical risk tools (CRTs) aggregate these to estimate futu...
ODP138 Age-related Associations of LDL Cholesterol and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study
ODP138 Age-related Associations of LDL Cholesterol and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study
Abstract
Background
No completed randomized trial exclusively incorporating the elderly has addressed the benefit of statin trea...
Abstract 4368817: Genetic Evidence Suggests Combined Inhibition of Lipoprotein(a) and PCSK9 to Lower Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk.
Abstract 4368817: Genetic Evidence Suggests Combined Inhibition of Lipoprotein(a) and PCSK9 to Lower Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk.
Background:
Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are each independent drivers of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disea...
Age‐Related Associations of Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Population‐Based Cohort Study
Age‐Related Associations of Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Population‐Based Cohort Study
Background
The relationship between low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) according to age remains undetermined...
Abstract 4142745: Lipoprotein(a) distribution across autoimmune inflammatory diseases: a pooled analysis from 28 Phase III clinical trials
Abstract 4142745: Lipoprotein(a) distribution across autoimmune inflammatory diseases: a pooled analysis from 28 Phase III clinical trials
Background:
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is largely determined by genetic factors and is associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Rea...
Abstract 4370430: Sex-Specific Association of Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract 4370430: Sex-Specific Association of Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background:
Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is recognized as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, the precise magni...

