Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract 4370430: Sex-Specific Association of Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View through CrossRef
Background: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is recognized as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, the precise magnitude of this association at different Lp(a) concentrations and potential differences between sexes warrant further elucidation. Objective: This meta-analysis evaluated the association between various Lp(a) thresholds and ASCVD risk, stratified by sex. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception until May 2025. Studies reporting on Lp(a) levels predicting ASCVD risk were included for analysis. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ASCVD were calculated using a DerSimonian–Laird random-effects models for predefined Lp(a) thresholds (>20, >30, >50, and >100 mg/dL) compared to lower levels, separately for men and women. Results: Out of 1,135 studies screened, 5 studies comprising participants were 111,246 included. The mean age was 58.7 ± 12.04 years. Elevated Lp(a) was significantly associated with increased ASCVD risk in men (AOR 1.47 [1.24-1.74], I2:97.98%) and women (AOR 1.39 [1.21-1.59], I2:94.03%), both p<0.001. A dose-response relationship was evident in both sexes. In men, significant risk emerged at Lp(a) >30 mg/dL (AOR 1.18 [1.13-1.22], p<0.001), increasing to an AOR of 2.04 [1.22-3.40] (p=0.01) for levels >100 mg/dL. In women, significant risk was apparent at Lp(a) >50 mg/dL (AOR 1.48 [1.26-1.72], p<0.001), reaching an AOR of 1.74 [1.22-2.48] (p<0.001) for levels >100 mg/dL. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the direction and significance of these pooled estimates were not dependent on any single study. Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms a significant and dose-dependent association between elevated Lp(a) concentrations and increased ASCVD risk in both men and women. While overall risk estimates at high Lp(a) concentrations showed considerable overlap, significant ASCVD risk appeared at Lp(a) concentrations >30 mg/dL in men, whereas in women, this was evident at concentrations >50 mg/dL. These findings underscore the importance of Lp(a) as a key cardiovascular risk factor in both sexes and may inform sex-specific considerations in risk stratification and future guideline development for ASCVD prevention.
Title: Abstract 4370430: Sex-Specific Association of Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Description:
Background: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is recognized as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
However, the precise magnitude of this association at different Lp(a) concentrations and potential differences between sexes warrant further elucidation.
Objective: This meta-analysis evaluated the association between various Lp(a) thresholds and ASCVD risk, stratified by sex.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception until May 2025.
Studies reporting on Lp(a) levels predicting ASCVD risk were included for analysis.
Pooled adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ASCVD were calculated using a DerSimonian–Laird random-effects models for predefined Lp(a) thresholds (>20, >30, >50, and >100 mg/dL) compared to lower levels, separately for men and women.
Results: Out of 1,135 studies screened, 5 studies comprising participants were 111,246 included.
The mean age was 58.
7 ± 12.
04 years.
Elevated Lp(a) was significantly associated with increased ASCVD risk in men (AOR 1.
47 [1.
24-1.
74], I2:97.
98%) and women (AOR 1.
39 [1.
21-1.
59], I2:94.
03%), both p<0.
001.
A dose-response relationship was evident in both sexes.
In men, significant risk emerged at Lp(a) >30 mg/dL (AOR 1.
18 [1.
13-1.
22], p<0.
001), increasing to an AOR of 2.
04 [1.
22-3.
40] (p=0.
01) for levels >100 mg/dL.
In women, significant risk was apparent at Lp(a) >50 mg/dL (AOR 1.
48 [1.
26-1.
72], p<0.
001), reaching an AOR of 1.
74 [1.
22-2.
48] (p<0.
001) for levels >100 mg/dL.
A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the direction and significance of these pooled estimates were not dependent on any single study.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms a significant and dose-dependent association between elevated Lp(a) concentrations and increased ASCVD risk in both men and women.
While overall risk estimates at high Lp(a) concentrations showed considerable overlap, significant ASCVD risk appeared at Lp(a) concentrations >30 mg/dL in men, whereas in women, this was evident at concentrations >50 mg/dL.
These findings underscore the importance of Lp(a) as a key cardiovascular risk factor in both sexes and may inform sex-specific considerations in risk stratification and future guideline development for ASCVD prevention.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Renal Lipoprotein (a) Metabolism
Renal Lipoprotein (a) Metabolism
The kidney plays a central role in lipoprotein(a) catabolism, acting as a “cemetery for lipoprotein(a)” through uptake, fragmentation, and excretion. Direct human evidence comes fr...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Sex differences in disease genetics
Sex differences in disease genetics
Abstract There is long-standing evidence for gene-by-sex interactions in disease risk, which can now be tested in genome-wide association studies with participant n...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

Back to Top