Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory management is provided. Methods Using the laboratory evaluation tool developed by World Health Organization and a combination of TOPSIS and RSR methods, a system of evaluation indicators for the management of Chinese pathogenic microbiology laboratories is established for comprehensively evaluating the pathogenic microbiology laboratories of seven provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Results The evaluation system includes 12 primary indicators and 37 secondary indicators. In terms of laboratory management, the seven laboratories were ranked as D, G, E, C, F, B, and A in descending order. None of these laboratories were evaluated as “good” or “poor.” One of the laboratories was marked as “relatively poor” (A), two as “medium” (B and F), and four as “relatively good” (C, E, G, and D). Conclusion In this study, a method for evaluating laboratory management using the TOPSIS and RSR methods is proposed, and a basis for comprehensively evaluating laboratory management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is provided to reflect management practices.
Title: Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods
Description:
Abstract Background In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory management is provided.
Methods Using the laboratory evaluation tool developed by World Health Organization and a combination of TOPSIS and RSR methods, a system of evaluation indicators for the management of Chinese pathogenic microbiology laboratories is established for comprehensively evaluating the pathogenic microbiology laboratories of seven provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Results The evaluation system includes 12 primary indicators and 37 secondary indicators.
In terms of laboratory management, the seven laboratories were ranked as D, G, E, C, F, B, and A in descending order.
None of these laboratories were evaluated as “good” or “poor.
” One of the laboratories was marked as “relatively poor” (A), two as “medium” (B and F), and four as “relatively good” (C, E, G, and D).
Conclusion In this study, a method for evaluating laboratory management using the TOPSIS and RSR methods is proposed, and a basis for comprehensively evaluating laboratory management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is provided to reflect management practices.

Related Results

Evaluation of TOPSIS Algorithm for Multi-Criteria Handover in LEO Satellite Networks: A Sensitivity Analysis
Evaluation of TOPSIS Algorithm for Multi-Criteria Handover in LEO Satellite Networks: A Sensitivity Analysis
The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is widely recognized as an effective multi-criteria decision-making algorithm for handover management in...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
EVALUATING PARETO FRONT WITH TOPSIS AND FUZZY TOPSIS FOR LITERACY RATES IN ODISHA
EVALUATING PARETO FRONT WITH TOPSIS AND FUZZY TOPSIS FOR LITERACY RATES IN ODISHA
In engineering design and manufacturing, conflicting disciplines and technologies are always involved in the design process. Decision making is the process of finding the best opti...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Measurable Progress? Teaching Artsworkers to Assess and Articulate the Impact of Their Work
Measurable Progress? Teaching Artsworkers to Assess and Articulate the Impact of Their Work
The National Cultural Policy Discussion Paper—drafted to assist the Australian Government in developing the first national Cultural Policy since Creative Nation nearly two decades ...
METODE SAW DAN TOPSIS DALAM SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN: TINJAUAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS
METODE SAW DAN TOPSIS DALAM SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN: TINJAUAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution...
SENSITIVITY TEST FUZZY TOPSIS AND FUZZY TOPSIS ROC METHODS FOR THE SELECTION OF THE SASIRANGAN BANJAR FABRIC MOTIFS
SENSITIVITY TEST FUZZY TOPSIS AND FUZZY TOPSIS ROC METHODS FOR THE SELECTION OF THE SASIRANGAN BANJAR FABRIC MOTIFS
Decision making is one of problem that we often find in society, as well as choosing the fabric of the motif of Sasirangan Banjar that currently there are many kinds of it. So, to ...
Penerapan Metode Topsis Pada Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan
Penerapan Metode Topsis Pada Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan
AbstrakHasil dari kinerja karyawan dapat dijadikan sebuah peluang untuk para pegawai dan perusahaan dalam melihat kemampuan serta potensi dari sisi internal. Dari hasil tersebut pe...

Back to Top