Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE OF ENDODONTIC EQUIPMENT WITH GASTRIC PACEMAKER

View through CrossRef
Electromagnetic interference (EMI) from endodontic equipment could potentially affect a gastric pacemaker. This article is an overview of the interaction risks, potential consequences, and precautions of the electromagnetic interference of those devices. It is all about interaction that certain electronic dental devices may interfere with the pacemaker’s function, but the level of risk depends on the type of equipment and how close it's used to the pacemaker. The gastric pacemaker operates using small electrical impulses to stimulate stomach muscles. If an endodontic device induces unintended electrical currents in the body, these could be picked up by the pacemaker’s leads, potentially disrupting its normal function. Electromagnetic interference between a gastric pacemaker (also called a gastric electrical stimulator, GES) and endodontic equipment is a potential concern, especially in dental procedures involving electronic endodontic devices. On the other hand, endodontic devices are used in root canal therapy include apex locators, electric motors for rotary files, electrosurgery units, and ultrasonic devices and they generate electrical or electromagnetic fields. In summury, the patients with a gastric pacemaker can be managed safely in the dental setting with input from the gastroenterology team and the manufacturing team. De- and re-activation is relatively simple and ensures that the risk to both device and patient is reduced as far as is reasonably practicable. Also, there is a need to keep electrical devices (especially ultrasonic and electrosurgical tools) at least 15–30 cm (6–12 inches) away from the implanted pacemaker site of use modern apex locators and rotary motors with minimal electromagnetic emission, to minimize electromagnetic interference between those two devices.
Title: ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE OF ENDODONTIC EQUIPMENT WITH GASTRIC PACEMAKER
Description:
Electromagnetic interference (EMI) from endodontic equipment could potentially affect a gastric pacemaker.
This article is an overview of the interaction risks, potential consequences, and precautions of the electromagnetic interference of those devices.
It is all about interaction that certain electronic dental devices may interfere with the pacemaker’s function, but the level of risk depends on the type of equipment and how close it's used to the pacemaker.
The gastric pacemaker operates using small electrical impulses to stimulate stomach muscles.
If an endodontic device induces unintended electrical currents in the body, these could be picked up by the pacemaker’s leads, potentially disrupting its normal function.
Electromagnetic interference between a gastric pacemaker (also called a gastric electrical stimulator, GES) and endodontic equipment is a potential concern, especially in dental procedures involving electronic endodontic devices.
On the other hand, endodontic devices are used in root canal therapy include apex locators, electric motors for rotary files, electrosurgery units, and ultrasonic devices and they generate electrical or electromagnetic fields.
In summury, the patients with a gastric pacemaker can be managed safely in the dental setting with input from the gastroenterology team and the manufacturing team.
De- and re-activation is relatively simple and ensures that the risk to both device and patient is reduced as far as is reasonably practicable.
Also, there is a need to keep electrical devices (especially ultrasonic and electrosurgical tools) at least 15–30 cm (6–12 inches) away from the implanted pacemaker site of use modern apex locators and rotary motors with minimal electromagnetic emission, to minimize electromagnetic interference between those two devices.

Related Results

Aquaporin 3 Expression Pattern in Gastric Diseases and its significance
Aquaporin 3 Expression Pattern in Gastric Diseases and its significance
Abstract Background Aquaporin 3(AQP3) has been implicated in gastric intestinal metaplasia and gastric cancer, and considered as a biomarker to improve treatment strategy....
Gastric Pyloric Schwannoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Gastric Pyloric Schwannoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Abstract Introduction Schwannomas are slow-growing, subclinical neoplasms rarely found in the gastrointestinal tract. This study reports a schwannoma in the pyloric region of the s...
Analysis of Related Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors of Gastric Cancer with Bone Metastasis: A SEER-Based Study
Analysis of Related Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors of Gastric Cancer with Bone Metastasis: A SEER-Based Study
Background. Gastric cancer is among the most common malignant tumors at home and abroad, because its early symptoms are mostly insidious, which leads to distant metastasis when gas...
Device–device interference triggered by an abandoned pacemaker: a case report
Device–device interference triggered by an abandoned pacemaker: a case report
Abstract Background Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are prone to electromagnetic interference. Common sources inc...
NOURISHMENT OR NEGLECT: UNDERSTANDING THE INFLUENCE OF DIET ON THE SURGE OF GASTRIC CANCER IN PAKISTAN
NOURISHMENT OR NEGLECT: UNDERSTANDING THE INFLUENCE OF DIET ON THE SURGE OF GASTRIC CANCER IN PAKISTAN
Gastric cancer, a malignant tumour originating in the stomach, has become a pressing health concern in Pakistan. The country has witnessed a significant rise in gastric cancer case...
Study on the Value of miR6503-5p Combined with PGR in the Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer
Study on the Value of miR6503-5p Combined with PGR in the Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer
Objective To investigate the value of serum miRNA 6503-5p (miR6503-5p) combined with pepsinogen ratio (PGR) in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Methods: 94 patients (gastric ...

Back to Top