Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Clinical performance of implant supported mandibular overdentures with cantilever bar and stud attachments: A retrospective study

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundTreatment of edentulous patients with implant‐supported over‐dentures improves denture's retention and stability. Published data concerning implant‐supported overdenture with cantilever bars that claimed that can affect the survival and bone loss of implants are scarce.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate 5‐year clinical performance of mandibular implant‐supported over‐dentures with different attachment systems.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, 103 patients who had received mandibular over‐dentures supported by two implants were evaluated in a 5‐year follow up. Studied groups were patients with Spherblock ball attachment (58 patients), Dolder bar with cantilever (36 patients), and Locator attachment (9 patients). Marginal bone‐loss around implants, prosthetic complications, soft tissue status of the implants (gingival index, plaque index, pocket depth, and bleeding on probing) were used to compare studied groups. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) criteria was used to assay patient's satisfaction. One‐way ANOVA, Scheffe, Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney, and Fisher's exact tests, were used for the data analysis (α = 0.05).ResultsOne hundred and three patients (46 male, 57 female, mean age 64.7 ± 8.6) with 206 implants (Strauman) were studied. The implant survival rate was 100% with mean bone loss of 0.22 mm around implants in 5 years. Prosthetic complications including attachment wear and denture fracture occurred more often with ball attachments. The number of attachment replacement, and post insertion appointments were significantly less in patients with bar attachments (p < 0.05). Pocket depth and gingival index were less in the ball attachment (p < 0.05).ConclusionMandibular overdenture supported by two implants can be considered a successful treatment in edentulous patients. The frequency of prosthetic complication is higher in unsplinted than splinted superstructures.
Title: Clinical performance of implant supported mandibular overdentures with cantilever bar and stud attachments: A retrospective study
Description:
AbstractBackgroundTreatment of edentulous patients with implant‐supported over‐dentures improves denture's retention and stability.
Published data concerning implant‐supported overdenture with cantilever bars that claimed that can affect the survival and bone loss of implants are scarce.
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate 5‐year clinical performance of mandibular implant‐supported over‐dentures with different attachment systems.
Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, 103 patients who had received mandibular over‐dentures supported by two implants were evaluated in a 5‐year follow up.
Studied groups were patients with Spherblock ball attachment (58 patients), Dolder bar with cantilever (36 patients), and Locator attachment (9 patients).
Marginal bone‐loss around implants, prosthetic complications, soft tissue status of the implants (gingival index, plaque index, pocket depth, and bleeding on probing) were used to compare studied groups.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) criteria was used to assay patient's satisfaction.
One‐way ANOVA, Scheffe, Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney, and Fisher's exact tests, were used for the data analysis (α = 0.
05).
ResultsOne hundred and three patients (46 male, 57 female, mean age 64.
7 ± 8.
6) with 206 implants (Strauman) were studied.
The implant survival rate was 100% with mean bone loss of 0.
22 mm around implants in 5 years.
Prosthetic complications including attachment wear and denture fracture occurred more often with ball attachments.
The number of attachment replacement, and post insertion appointments were significantly less in patients with bar attachments (p < 0.
05).
Pocket depth and gingival index were less in the ball attachment (p < 0.
05).
ConclusionMandibular overdenture supported by two implants can be considered a successful treatment in edentulous patients.
The frequency of prosthetic complication is higher in unsplinted than splinted superstructures.

Related Results

Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
AbstractBackgroundDental implant‐retained overdentures have been chosen as the treatment of choice for complete mandibular removable dentures. Dental implants, such as mini dental ...
Studies on maxillary overdentures: implant- and prosthesis survival, cost analysis and patient-reported outcomes
Studies on maxillary overdentures: implant- and prosthesis survival, cost analysis and patient-reported outcomes
Edentulism is a debilitating condition which may negatively affect quality of life, particularly in relation to nutritional and social health, speech, and poor facial appearance. P...
Behavior of headed shear studs in stub–girder stub assemblages
Behavior of headed shear studs in stub–girder stub assemblages
The paper summarizes the results of push-off tests conducted on 42 end stub assemblages. Written for conventional composite construction, the current Canadian Standards Association...
Swallowing dynamics of two implants versus single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: randomized clinical trial
Swallowing dynamics of two implants versus single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: randomized clinical trial
Objective This study evaluated the swallowing dynamics of two-implant (2-IOD) versus singleimplant (1-IOD) mandibular overdentures using the Test of Mastication and Swallowing Soli...
Assessment of Candida Species Colonization and Denture-Related Stomatitis in Bar- and Locator-Retained Overdentures
Assessment of Candida Species Colonization and Denture-Related Stomatitis in Bar- and Locator-Retained Overdentures
The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of denture-related stomatitis (DRS) in different attachment-retained overdenture wearers and its association with particular colo...
Observation of the effect on immediate mandibular implant-supported overdenture of micro implant system of Italy
Observation of the effect on immediate mandibular implant-supported overdenture of micro implant system of Italy
The study was design to investigate the clinical effect of Micro implant system in Italy on immediate mandibular implant-supported overdenture. A total of 192 patients with mandibu...
Retention Evaluation of Implant-Supported Palateless Maxillary Overdentures Retained by PEEK Telescopic Attachment
Retention Evaluation of Implant-Supported Palateless Maxillary Overdentures Retained by PEEK Telescopic Attachment
Background: Retention and stabilization of implant-supported overdenture is associated with more patient satisfaction, chewing capability, and oral health-related quality of life. ...
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Abstract Background Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone d...

Back to Top