Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A data-driven approach to the issue of ”catching up with monolinguals”
View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND: Multilingual children in monolingual education systems are typically assessed against monolingual norms, complicating differentiation between normal multilingual development and genuine language disorders. When language experience is distributed across multiple languages, clinicians and educators struggle to determine whether multilingual learners need routine support or specialist intervention for developmental language disorders.AIMS: This study identified: (1) the cumulative societal language (SL) exposure threshold beyond which multilingual children perform within monolingual proficiency ranges, and (2) when cumulative SL experience no longer predicts SL proficiency.METHODS: We examined multilingual learners (ages 5–9) across three societal languages (English, French, Dutch), assessing morphosyntax via sentence repetition and receptive vocabulary (breadth and depth). Binary partition and broken stick regression identified exposure-outcome thresholds while controlling for environmental and cognitive factors. Cumulative SL exposure was measured in month-equivalents.RESULTS: For morphosyntax, multilingual children required minimum 59 month-equivalent cumulative SL exposure to reach monolingual performance ranges. Diminishing returns occurred after approximately 57 months (4 years), beyond which morphosyntactic outcomes were no longer strongly exposure-constrained. For vocabulary breadth, no clear threshold emerged; significant differences persisted even at 94 month-equivalent exposure, with outcomes predicted more by cognitive factors and language experience richness than cumulative exposure. Vocabulary depth showed a threshold at 91 months, though sample limitations prevent firm conclusions.CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate domain-specificity: morphosyntax and vocabulary show different exposure-outcome dynamics. Multilingual children require approximately 93 month-equivalent cumulative SL exposure for full morphosyntactic competence comparable to monolinguals. Before 57 months cumulative exposure, difficulties are developmentally expected; specialist referral should occur if concerns persist beyond this threshold. These findings provide research-informed guidance for contextualizing assessment expectations based on multilingual backgrounds, moving from deficit-based comparisons toward recognizing expected developmental trajectories.
Center for Open Science
Title: A data-driven approach to the issue of ”catching up with monolinguals”
Description:
BACKGROUND: Multilingual children in monolingual education systems are typically assessed against monolingual norms, complicating differentiation between normal multilingual development and genuine language disorders.
When language experience is distributed across multiple languages, clinicians and educators struggle to determine whether multilingual learners need routine support or specialist intervention for developmental language disorders.
AIMS: This study identified: (1) the cumulative societal language (SL) exposure threshold beyond which multilingual children perform within monolingual proficiency ranges, and (2) when cumulative SL experience no longer predicts SL proficiency.
METHODS: We examined multilingual learners (ages 5–9) across three societal languages (English, French, Dutch), assessing morphosyntax via sentence repetition and receptive vocabulary (breadth and depth).
Binary partition and broken stick regression identified exposure-outcome thresholds while controlling for environmental and cognitive factors.
Cumulative SL exposure was measured in month-equivalents.
RESULTS: For morphosyntax, multilingual children required minimum 59 month-equivalent cumulative SL exposure to reach monolingual performance ranges.
Diminishing returns occurred after approximately 57 months (4 years), beyond which morphosyntactic outcomes were no longer strongly exposure-constrained.
For vocabulary breadth, no clear threshold emerged; significant differences persisted even at 94 month-equivalent exposure, with outcomes predicted more by cognitive factors and language experience richness than cumulative exposure.
Vocabulary depth showed a threshold at 91 months, though sample limitations prevent firm conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate domain-specificity: morphosyntax and vocabulary show different exposure-outcome dynamics.
Multilingual children require approximately 93 month-equivalent cumulative SL exposure for full morphosyntactic competence comparable to monolinguals.
Before 57 months cumulative exposure, difficulties are developmentally expected; specialist referral should occur if concerns persist beyond this threshold.
These findings provide research-informed guidance for contextualizing assessment expectations based on multilingual backgrounds, moving from deficit-based comparisons toward recognizing expected developmental trajectories.
Related Results
Critical questioning skills of bilingual children
Critical questioning skills of bilingual children
This study reports the critical questioning skills of monolingual and bilingual children aged between 5 and 6. By examining their questions, this research employs Bloom’s critical ...
Effects of exercise training on language comprehension_final
Effects of exercise training on language comprehension_final
Exercise training has been proposed to counteract age-related cognitive decline through improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF hypothesis). Research has focused on cognitiv...
An ERP investigation of cognitive control in bilinguals
An ERP investigation of cognitive control in bilinguals
[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT REQUEST OF AUTHOR.] Bilingualism is known to impact both language processing and cognitive abilities. The effects on cognitive a...
Incomplete Acquisition, Attrition and Maintenance of Heritage Speakers’ Family Language: Iranians in New Zealand
Incomplete Acquisition, Attrition and Maintenance of Heritage Speakers’ Family Language: Iranians in New Zealand
<p>This dissertation is composed of a quantitative investigation of Incomplete Heritage Language Acquisition and Attrition in heritage speakers’ vocabulary knowledge. This po...
Bilingual speakers’ enhanced monitoring can slow them down
Bilingual speakers’ enhanced monitoring can slow them down
AbstractPerformance differences between bilinguals and monolinguals on conflict tasks can be affected by the balance of various sub-processes such as conflict monitoring and alloca...
Is there cross-language modulation when bilinguals process number words?
Is there cross-language modulation when bilinguals process number words?
ABSTRACTThis study explores the possibility of cross-language activation when bilinguals process number words in their first language (Italian) and their second language (German). ...
Sound Change in Albanian Monolinguals and Albanian–English Sequential Bilingual Returnees in Tirana, Albania
Sound Change in Albanian Monolinguals and Albanian–English Sequential Bilingual Returnees in Tirana, Albania
This research investigated contrastive perception of L1 phonological categories in Albanian–English bilinguals who returned to Albania after living abroad for over on average a dec...
Bilingualism and the Brain
Bilingualism and the Brain
Bilinguals have been compared with monolinguals and become research focus due to their more extensive communication skills, more complex thought processes, and easier identity deve...

