Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Percutaneous cryoablation therapy for abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objectives Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) consists of endometrial tissue between the peritoneum and the abdominal wall. The established treatment involves amenorrheic drugs—not always successful and tolerated—or invasive surgery. In this scenario, minimally invasive techniques such as cryoablation are a potential option. In this study, we primarily aimed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation in reducing pain scores of AWE patients and analyze their satisfaction with the procedure and its related adverse events. Materials and Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane’s databases were systematically searched for studies that employed percutaneous cryoablation therapy for AWE and reported any of the outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was the reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS) score after treatment. R Software was used for the statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. The Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies—of Interventions framework assessed potential bias in each selected study. Results We included 4 studies, containing 126 patients. All articles were retrospective studies. The difference between the VAS scores before and after treatment was on average 5.97 points (95% CI 5.42-6.52; P <.01; I2 = 0%). The pooled satisfaction rate among patients in the selected studies was 93.1% (95% CI 88.66-97.34; P = .51; I2 = 0%). The pooled prevalence of adverse events was only 5.48% (95% CI 1.71-11.20; P = .58; I2 = 0%). Bias analysis showed an overall moderate risk in all included articles. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that cryoablation could reduce pain complaints in patients, while presenting a low incidence rate of adverse effects. Randomized clinical trials with a larger number of patients are necessary for greater conclusions. Advances in knowledge (1) AWE affects about 3.5% of women. The standard treatment is invasive surgery. (2) This meta-analysis demonstrated that cryoablation can effectively reduce pain scores while presenting a low rate of adverse effects. (3) Cryoablation is a feasible treatment for AWE, furthermore allowing shorter hospital stays and few complications for the patients.
Title: Percutaneous cryoablation therapy for abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Description:
Abstract Objectives Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) consists of endometrial tissue between the peritoneum and the abdominal wall.
The established treatment involves amenorrheic drugs—not always successful and tolerated—or invasive surgery.
In this scenario, minimally invasive techniques such as cryoablation are a potential option.
In this study, we primarily aimed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation in reducing pain scores of AWE patients and analyze their satisfaction with the procedure and its related adverse events.
Materials and Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane’s databases were systematically searched for studies that employed percutaneous cryoablation therapy for AWE and reported any of the outcomes of interest.
The primary outcome was the reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS) score after treatment.
R Software was used for the statistical analysis.
Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics.
The Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies—of Interventions framework assessed potential bias in each selected study.
Results We included 4 studies, containing 126 patients.
All articles were retrospective studies.
The difference between the VAS scores before and after treatment was on average 5.
97 points (95% CI 5.
42-6.
52; P <.
01; I2 = 0%).
The pooled satisfaction rate among patients in the selected studies was 93.
1% (95% CI 88.
66-97.
34; P = .
51; I2 = 0%).
The pooled prevalence of adverse events was only 5.
48% (95% CI 1.
71-11.
20; P = .
58; I2 = 0%).
Bias analysis showed an overall moderate risk in all included articles.
Conclusion Our study demonstrated that cryoablation could reduce pain complaints in patients, while presenting a low incidence rate of adverse effects.
Randomized clinical trials with a larger number of patients are necessary for greater conclusions.
Advances in knowledge (1) AWE affects about 3.
5% of women.
The standard treatment is invasive surgery.
(2) This meta-analysis demonstrated that cryoablation can effectively reduce pain scores while presenting a low rate of adverse effects.
(3) Cryoablation is a feasible treatment for AWE, furthermore allowing shorter hospital stays and few complications for the patients.

Related Results

O-056 Can we tailor ART to endometriosis patients?
O-056 Can we tailor ART to endometriosis patients?
Abstract ART remains an effective treatment for endometriosis-associated infertility, although there is evidence that pregnancy rates are diminished in women with en...
Evaluation of PTEN and Ki67 Expression in Typical and Atypical Endometriosis and Endometriosis Associated Ovarian Cancer
Evaluation of PTEN and Ki67 Expression in Typical and Atypical Endometriosis and Endometriosis Associated Ovarian Cancer
Background: Several studies reported that endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Atypical endometriosis is common in patients with endometriosis-asso...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Endometrioma patients are under-treated with endocrine endometriosis therapy
Endometrioma patients are under-treated with endocrine endometriosis therapy
Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is there a difference in the use of endocrine endometriosis therapy in endometriosis patients with and w...

Back to Top