Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Towards an Elementary Proof for Fermat’s Last Theorem

View through CrossRef
Pierre de Fermat first stated around 1637 that for any integer n> 2, the equation a n + b n = c n has no positive integer solutions and he stated the theorem in the margin of a copy of Arithmetica. His proof is available only for the equation a 4 + b 4 = c 4 for the exponent n = 4. Subsequently Euler proved the theorem in the equation a 3 + b 3 = c 3 for the exponent n = 3. Taking the above two proofs of Fermat and Euler, it would suffice to prove the theorem for n = p, where p is any prime > 3. In this proof, we hypothesize all r, s and t as positive integers satisfying the equation rp + sp = tp and establish a contradiction. We use another auxiliary equation x 3 + y 3 = z 3 , and combine the two equations using transformation equations. Solving the transformation equations we establish a contradiction, thereby proving the theorem.
Title: Towards an Elementary Proof for Fermat’s Last Theorem
Description:
Pierre de Fermat first stated around 1637 that for any integer n> 2, the equation a n + b n = c n has no positive integer solutions and he stated the theorem in the margin of a copy of Arithmetica.
His proof is available only for the equation a 4 + b 4 = c 4 for the exponent n = 4.
Subsequently Euler proved the theorem in the equation a 3 + b 3 = c 3 for the exponent n = 3.
Taking the above two proofs of Fermat and Euler, it would suffice to prove the theorem for n = p, where p is any prime > 3.
In this proof, we hypothesize all r, s and t as positive integers satisfying the equation rp + sp = tp and establish a contradiction.
We use another auxiliary equation x 3 + y 3 = z 3 , and combine the two equations using transformation equations.
Solving the transformation equations we establish a contradiction, thereby proving the theorem.

Related Results

Fermat's Last Theorem: A Proof by Contradiction
Fermat's Last Theorem: A Proof by Contradiction
In this paper I offer an algebraic proof by contradiction of Fermat’s Last Theorem. Using an alternative to the standard binomial expansion, (a+b) n = a n + b Pn i=1 a n−i (a + b) ...
In Search of the Truly Marvelous Proof
In Search of the Truly Marvelous Proof
Abstract: Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT), proposed in 1637 by Pierre de Fermat, states that no positive integers a,b, and c satisfy the equation a^n+b^n=c^n for any integer n>2...
Fermat Polynomials and Extended Fermat’s Theorem
Fermat Polynomials and Extended Fermat’s Theorem
This study discusses the connection between Fermat perfect natural vectors and some specific Fermat polynomials, whose maximal root is a natural number forming part of the Fermat v...
A Proof for Fermat’s Last Theorem
A Proof for Fermat’s Last Theorem
Fermat’s proposition during 1637 that the Diophantine equation xn + yn = zn where x, y, z and n are integers has no solution for n > 2 has come to be known as Fermat’s Last Theo...
Ghani Mersenne and Fermat Entropy for Some Dendrimers and Their Structure-Property Modeling
Ghani Mersenne and Fermat Entropy for Some Dendrimers and Their Structure-Property Modeling
The mathematical language provided by various topological index types may be used to identify various properties of chemical components in a molecular structure. Within the framewo...
Implementasi Pembelajaran IPS Sebagai Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar
Implementasi Pembelajaran IPS Sebagai Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar
This study aims to analyze the implementation of social studies learning as strengthening character education in elementary schools. The research method used is a qualitative descr...
Can a computer proof be elegant?
Can a computer proof be elegant?
In computer science, proofs about computer algorithms are par for the course. Proofs by computer algorithms, on the other hand, are not so readily accepted....

Back to Top