Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Proof for Fermat’s Last Theorem
View through CrossRef
Fermat’s proposition during 1637 that the Diophantine equation xn + yn = zn where x, y, z and n are integers has no solution for n > 2 has come to be known as Fermat’s Last Theorem.
Taking the proofs of the theorem by Fermat and Euler for the index n = 4 and n = 3, it would suffice to prove the theorem for the index p which is any prime >3.
We consider the equation rp + sp = tp to prove the theorem.
We take another auxiliary equation x3 + y3 = z3 to substantiate the proof. Both equations have been combined by means of equivalent equations, into which we have employed the Ramanujan-Nagell equation. Solving the equivalent equations using the Ramanujan-Nagell Equation we prove the theorem.
European Open Science Publishing
Title: A Proof for Fermat’s Last Theorem
Description:
Fermat’s proposition during 1637 that the Diophantine equation xn + yn = zn where x, y, z and n are integers has no solution for n > 2 has come to be known as Fermat’s Last Theorem.
Taking the proofs of the theorem by Fermat and Euler for the index n = 4 and n = 3, it would suffice to prove the theorem for the index p which is any prime >3.
We consider the equation rp + sp = tp to prove the theorem.
We take another auxiliary equation x3 + y3 = z3 to substantiate the proof.
Both equations have been combined by means of equivalent equations, into which we have employed the Ramanujan-Nagell equation.
Solving the equivalent equations using the Ramanujan-Nagell Equation we prove the theorem.
Related Results
Fermat's Last Theorem: A Proof by Contradiction
Fermat's Last Theorem: A Proof by Contradiction
In this paper I offer an algebraic proof by contradiction of Fermat’s Last Theorem. Using an alternative to the standard binomial expansion, (a+b) n = a n + b Pn i=1 a n−i (a + b) ...
In Search of the Truly Marvelous Proof
In Search of the Truly Marvelous Proof
Abstract: Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT), proposed in 1637 by Pierre de Fermat, states that no positive integers a,b, and c satisfy the equation a^n+b^n=c^n for any integer n>2...
Fermat Polynomials and Extended Fermat’s Theorem
Fermat Polynomials and Extended Fermat’s Theorem
This study discusses the connection between Fermat perfect natural vectors and some specific Fermat polynomials, whose maximal root is a natural number forming part of the Fermat v...
Transport Layer Security 1.0 handshake protocol formal verification case study: How to use a proof script generator for existing large proof scores
Transport Layer Security 1.0 handshake protocol formal verification case study: How to use a proof script generator for existing large proof scores
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.0 protocol has been formally verified with CafeInMaude Proof Generator (CiMPG) and Proof Assistant (CiMPA), where CafeInMaude is the second maj...
Ghani Mersenne and Fermat Entropy for Some Dendrimers and Their Structure-Property Modeling
Ghani Mersenne and Fermat Entropy for Some Dendrimers and Their Structure-Property Modeling
The mathematical language provided by various topological index types may be used to identify various properties of chemical components in a molecular structure. Within the framewo...
Towards an Elementary Proof for Fermat’s Last Theorem
Towards an Elementary Proof for Fermat’s Last Theorem
Pierre de Fermat first stated around 1637 that for any integer n> 2, the equation a n + b n = c n has no positive integer solutions and he stated the theorem in the margin o...
Can a computer proof be elegant?
Can a computer proof be elegant?
In computer science, proofs about computer algorithms are par for the course. Proofs
by
computer algorithms, on the other hand, are not so readily accepted....
On free proof and regulated proof
On free proof and regulated proof
Free proof and regulated proof are two basic modes of judicial proof. The system of ‘legal proof’ established in France in the 16th century is a classical model of regulated proof....

