Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ten Fallacies and Ten Truths of Psychopharmacology—Explained
View through CrossRef
Ten fallacies and ten truths in the practice of psychopharmacology are provided and explained. The fallacies are: More is better; What gets you well keeps you well; Treat to remission; Polypharmacy is good; Make one change at a time; 4–8 weeks is a sufficient trial of a drug; Dose low, go slow; Always taper a drug; Treat the most severe symptom; and Always incorporate the patient’s preference. The ten truths are: Your treatment is as good as your diagnosis; Treat diseases, not symptoms; All drugs are guilty until proven innocent; All drugs are toxic, dosing and indication make them therapeutic; Always have an exit strategy; Most current psychotropic drugs have some dramatic benefits but are not disease-modifying—the clearest exception is lithium; Older drugs are more effective than newer drugs; Newer drugs are more tolerable older drugs; Treatment “resistance” usually reflects either misdiagnosis or an invalid diagnosis; and Course, not symptoms, reveals the diagnosis These examples highlight common issues or debates in clinical psychopharmacology, and provide a perspective that promotes the Hippocratic, disease-oriented, clinically based approach of this text.
Title: Ten Fallacies and Ten Truths of Psychopharmacology—Explained
Description:
Ten fallacies and ten truths in the practice of psychopharmacology are provided and explained.
The fallacies are: More is better; What gets you well keeps you well; Treat to remission; Polypharmacy is good; Make one change at a time; 4–8 weeks is a sufficient trial of a drug; Dose low, go slow; Always taper a drug; Treat the most severe symptom; and Always incorporate the patient’s preference.
The ten truths are: Your treatment is as good as your diagnosis; Treat diseases, not symptoms; All drugs are guilty until proven innocent; All drugs are toxic, dosing and indication make them therapeutic; Always have an exit strategy; Most current psychotropic drugs have some dramatic benefits but are not disease-modifying—the clearest exception is lithium; Older drugs are more effective than newer drugs; Newer drugs are more tolerable older drugs; Treatment “resistance” usually reflects either misdiagnosis or an invalid diagnosis; and Course, not symptoms, reveals the diagnosis These examples highlight common issues or debates in clinical psychopharmacology, and provide a perspective that promotes the Hippocratic, disease-oriented, clinically based approach of this text.
Related Results
Disinterring 100 New Scientific Fallacies Direct and Indirect: Using Discourse and Narrative Analyses to Unearth New Scientific Fallacies
Disinterring 100 New Scientific Fallacies Direct and Indirect: Using Discourse and Narrative Analyses to Unearth New Scientific Fallacies
This paper is by no means our first one on scientific fallacies, we had published at least two papers on this topic
earlier over the last couple of years or so. The earlier papers ...
The Impact of Logical Fallacies in Business Communication: Exploring their Impact on Decision Making and Interpersonal Relationships in the Professional World
The Impact of Logical Fallacies in Business Communication: Exploring their Impact on Decision Making and Interpersonal Relationships in the Professional World
Effective business communication is critical in improving organizational efficiency, speeding up decision-making, and reducing conflict. However, in practice, communication is ofte...
Quantifying Aristotle’s Fallacies
Quantifying Aristotle’s Fallacies
Fallacies are logically false statements which are often considered to be true. In the “Sophistical Refutations”, the last of his six works on Logic, Aristotle identified the first...
Fallacies in Judicial Interpretation
Fallacies in Judicial Interpretation
<p>This thesis concerns fallacies in judicial interpretation. The central contention of this thesis is that judges commit certain fallacies when interpreting language and tha...
A Case Study on the Development of Chinese EFL Debaters’ Argumentative Competence
A Case Study on the Development of Chinese EFL Debaters’ Argumentative Competence
This study aims to explore and analyze the argumentative competence of Chinese debaters by observing the fallacies they made in one semester’s English debate course. The 8 rounds o...
LOGICAL FALLACIES IN COMMUNICATION AND UNDERSTANDING LANGUAGE PRECISION
LOGICAL FALLACIES IN COMMUNICATION AND UNDERSTANDING LANGUAGE PRECISION
In the age of the digital era, it becomes more and more difficult to understand how to communicate with each other. Due to the prism of communicative logical fallacies, this essay ...
The Power of Words in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar: An Insight into Analyzing Julius Caesar from the Perspective of the Logical Fallacies
The Power of Words in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar: An Insight into Analyzing Julius Caesar from the Perspective of the Logical Fallacies
This research aims at utilizing the knowledge of logical fallacies in analyzing Shakespeare’s masterpiece Julius Caesar. Spotting these fallacies in the characters’ actions and spe...
Extending Lawson and Robins’ (2021) Guideline for the Evaluation of Jingle and Jangle Fallacies
Extending Lawson and Robins’ (2021) Guideline for the Evaluation of Jingle and Jangle Fallacies
The existence of jingle fallacies (equally named constructs/measures that, in fact, assess different constructs) and jangle fallacies (differently named constructs/measures that, i...

