Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Quantifying Aristotle’s Fallacies
View through CrossRef
Fallacies are logically false statements which are often considered to be true. In the “Sophistical Refutations”, the last of his six works on Logic, Aristotle identified the first thirteen of today’s many known fallacies and divided them into linguistic and non-linguistic ones. A serious problem with fallacies is that, due to their bivalent texture, they can under certain conditions disorient the nonexpert. It is, therefore, very useful to quantify each fallacy by determining the “gravity” of its consequences. This is the target of the present work, where for historical and practical reasons—the fallacies are too many to deal with all of them—our attention is restricted to Aristotle’s fallacies only. However, the tools (Probability, Statistics and Fuzzy Logic) and the methods that we use for quantifying Aristotle’s fallacies could be also used for quantifying any other fallacy, which gives the required generality to our study.
Title: Quantifying Aristotle’s Fallacies
Description:
Fallacies are logically false statements which are often considered to be true.
In the “Sophistical Refutations”, the last of his six works on Logic, Aristotle identified the first thirteen of today’s many known fallacies and divided them into linguistic and non-linguistic ones.
A serious problem with fallacies is that, due to their bivalent texture, they can under certain conditions disorient the nonexpert.
It is, therefore, very useful to quantify each fallacy by determining the “gravity” of its consequences.
This is the target of the present work, where for historical and practical reasons—the fallacies are too many to deal with all of them—our attention is restricted to Aristotle’s fallacies only.
However, the tools (Probability, Statistics and Fuzzy Logic) and the methods that we use for quantifying Aristotle’s fallacies could be also used for quantifying any other fallacy, which gives the required generality to our study.
Related Results
Disinterring 100 New Scientific Fallacies Direct and Indirect: Using Discourse and Narrative Analyses to Unearth New Scientific Fallacies
Disinterring 100 New Scientific Fallacies Direct and Indirect: Using Discourse and Narrative Analyses to Unearth New Scientific Fallacies
This paper is by no means our first one on scientific fallacies, we had published at least two papers on this topic
earlier over the last couple of years or so. The earlier papers ...
The Impact of Logical Fallacies in Business Communication: Exploring their Impact on Decision Making and Interpersonal Relationships in the Professional World
The Impact of Logical Fallacies in Business Communication: Exploring their Impact on Decision Making and Interpersonal Relationships in the Professional World
Effective business communication is critical in improving organizational efficiency, speeding up decision-making, and reducing conflict. However, in practice, communication is ofte...
Fallacies in Judicial Interpretation
Fallacies in Judicial Interpretation
<p>This thesis concerns fallacies in judicial interpretation. The central contention of this thesis is that judges commit certain fallacies when interpreting language and tha...
Colloquium 4: Aristotle’s Discovery of First Philosophy
Colloquium 4: Aristotle’s Discovery of First Philosophy
Abstract
Among the three kinds of theoretical knowledge, Aristotle distinguishes between physics and metaphysics—what he calls Second and First Philosophy. Aristotle’s physics stud...
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?
AbstractThis book breaks new ground in the study of later ancient philosophy by examining the interplay of the two main schools of thought, Platonism and Aristotelianism, from the ...
A Case Study on the Development of Chinese EFL Debaters’ Argumentative Competence
A Case Study on the Development of Chinese EFL Debaters’ Argumentative Competence
This study aims to explore and analyze the argumentative competence of Chinese debaters by observing the fallacies they made in one semester’s English debate course. The 8 rounds o...
LOGICAL FALLACIES IN COMMUNICATION AND UNDERSTANDING LANGUAGE PRECISION
LOGICAL FALLACIES IN COMMUNICATION AND UNDERSTANDING LANGUAGE PRECISION
In the age of the digital era, it becomes more and more difficult to understand how to communicate with each other. Due to the prism of communicative logical fallacies, this essay ...
Bilgi ve Aristoteles - Aristoteles Felsefesinde Bilginin Temellendirilmesi
Bilgi ve Aristoteles - Aristoteles Felsefesinde Bilginin Temellendirilmesi
Knowledge and Aristotle The Grounding of Knowledge in Aristotle’s Philosophy-rnKnowledge is the most important form of human relationship with being. It has been one of the most im...

