Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Duplex Ultrasound Versus Computed Tomography for Follow Up of Complications after Evar with Nellix Endograft: First Clinical Experience
View through CrossRef
Summary
Introduction.Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) has become the ‘gold-standard’ imaging modality for surveillance following EVAR (2, 20). However repeated CT is related to increased cost, risk of contrast nephropathy and radiation exposure. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is a less invasive but considered less accurate method than CT.
Aim of the study. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both imaging modalities for detection of complications in post-EVAR patients where the new generation sac-sealing endograft was used and to compare cost-effectiveness and sensitivity of both imaging modalities.
Methods. Analysis of 23 post-EVAR patients with implantation of new generation sac-sealing endograft device (Nellix®, Endologix, USA) was performed, making a comparison of CT and DUS. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was taken as the ‘goldstandard’ investigation. DUS was compared to CT for analysis of sensitivity, post-imaging complications and cost-effectiveness. Statistical analysis of data was performed using v19.0 SPSS software (IBM).
Results. Analysis of CT and DUS studies compared in 23 patients. Both imaging modalities can detect AAA sac dimensions, endoleaks, and graft patency. The cost difference between two imaging techniques is substantial. Our results demonstrate that DUS surveillance during follow-up after EVAR where new generation sac-sealing endograft is used can accurately detect aneurysm size, endoleaks, graft deformations and stenotic or kinked graft limbs while lowering the overall costs of surveillance and eliminating CT related radiation and nephrotoxicity.
Conclusion. CT and DUS imaging can both detect AAA sac dimensions, endoleaks, and graft patency. The cost difference between the two imaging techniques is substantial. Our results demonstrate that in post-EVAR patients where new-generation sac-sealing endograft was deployed DUS surveillance performed by experienced radiologist can accurately detect aneurysm size, endoleaks, graft deformations and stenotic or kinked graft limbs while lowering the overall costs of surveillance and avoiding CT-related complications.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: Duplex Ultrasound Versus Computed Tomography for Follow Up of Complications after Evar with Nellix Endograft: First Clinical Experience
Description:
Summary
Introduction.
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) has become the ‘gold-standard’ imaging modality for surveillance following EVAR (2, 20).
However repeated CT is related to increased cost, risk of contrast nephropathy and radiation exposure.
Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is a less invasive but considered less accurate method than CT.
Aim of the study.
The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both imaging modalities for detection of complications in post-EVAR patients where the new generation sac-sealing endograft was used and to compare cost-effectiveness and sensitivity of both imaging modalities.
Methods.
Analysis of 23 post-EVAR patients with implantation of new generation sac-sealing endograft device (Nellix®, Endologix, USA) was performed, making a comparison of CT and DUS.
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was taken as the ‘goldstandard’ investigation.
DUS was compared to CT for analysis of sensitivity, post-imaging complications and cost-effectiveness.
Statistical analysis of data was performed using v19.
0 SPSS software (IBM).
Results.
Analysis of CT and DUS studies compared in 23 patients.
Both imaging modalities can detect AAA sac dimensions, endoleaks, and graft patency.
The cost difference between two imaging techniques is substantial.
Our results demonstrate that DUS surveillance during follow-up after EVAR where new generation sac-sealing endograft is used can accurately detect aneurysm size, endoleaks, graft deformations and stenotic or kinked graft limbs while lowering the overall costs of surveillance and eliminating CT related radiation and nephrotoxicity.
Conclusion.
CT and DUS imaging can both detect AAA sac dimensions, endoleaks, and graft patency.
The cost difference between the two imaging techniques is substantial.
Our results demonstrate that in post-EVAR patients where new-generation sac-sealing endograft was deployed DUS surveillance performed by experienced radiologist can accurately detect aneurysm size, endoleaks, graft deformations and stenotic or kinked graft limbs while lowering the overall costs of surveillance and avoiding CT-related complications.
Related Results
Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Accompanied Iliac Artery Aneurysms Using New Sack Sealing Device
Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Accompanied Iliac Artery Aneurysms Using New Sack Sealing Device
Summary
Introduction. 20-30% of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) occur simultaneously with unilateral or bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAA). Endovascular aneurysm ...
Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using the Endurant™ Endograft
Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using the Endurant™ Endograft
Background: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) represents a valid treatment modality for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). This study aimed to present rAAA outco...
Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years
Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years
Abstract
Background
The erosion of the early mortality advantage of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared with o...
Clinical Outcomes After Endovascular Repair and Open Surgery to Treat Immunoglobulin G4–Related and Nonrelated Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Clinical Outcomes After Endovascular Repair and Open Surgery to Treat Immunoglobulin G4–Related and Nonrelated Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Purpose: To compare the follow-up results of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs open surgery (OS) for inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) with regard to immunoglobu...
Five-year survival after elective open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
Five-year survival after elective open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
Background and objective:
Current evidence suggests short-term survival benefit from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) in el...
Long-Term Outcome of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Endovascular or Open Repair
Long-Term Outcome of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Endovascular or Open Repair
Objective Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been established as a standard treatment option for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA) and gained importance due to a ...
Langzeitergebnisse nach endovaskulärer und offener Versorgung des rupturierten Bauchaortenaneurysmas – eine Propensity-Score-Analyse
Langzeitergebnisse nach endovaskulärer und offener Versorgung des rupturierten Bauchaortenaneurysmas – eine Propensity-Score-Analyse
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund In dieser retrospektiven Propensity-Score-gematchten Studie sollten die perioperative Letalität und das Langzeitüberleben bis zu 9 Jahre nach ...
The treatment choices of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients in China in the era of value-based healthcare
The treatment choices of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients in China in the era of value-based healthcare
BackgroundEndovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is often seen as the first choice treatment for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), particularly high-risk patients, yet th...

