Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Five-year survival after elective open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

View through CrossRef
Background and objective: Current evidence suggests short-term survival benefit from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) procedures, but this benefit is lost during long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to compare short- and mid-term all-cause mortality in patients with non-ruptured aneurysm treated by OSR and EVAR; and to assess the rate of complications and reinterventions, as well as to evaluate their impact on survival. Methods: The medical records of the non-ruptured AAA patients undergoing OSR or EVAR between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2019 at Tartu University Hospital, Estonia, were retrospectively reviewed. We gathered survival data from the national registry (mean follow-up period was 3.7 ± 2.3 years). Results: A total of 225 non-ruptured AAA patients were treated operatively out of whom 95 (42.2%) were EVAR and 130 (57.8%) were OSR procedures. The difference in estimated all-cause mortality between the OSR and EVAR groups at day 30 was statistically irrelevant (2.3% vs 0%; p = 0.140), but OSR patients showed statistically significantly higher 5 year survival compared with EVAR patients (75.3% vs 50.0%, p = 0.002). Complication and reintervention rates for the EVAR and OSR groups did not differ statistically (26.3% vs 16.9%, p = 0.122; 10.5% vs 11.5%, p = 0.981, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that greater aneurysm diameter (p = 0.012), EVAR procedure (p = 0.016), male gender (p = 0.023), and cerebrovascular diseases (p = 0.028) were independently positively associated with 5-year mortality. Conclusions: Thirty-day mortality, and complication and reintervention rates for EVAR and OSR after elective AAA repair were similar. Although the EVAR procedure is an independent risk factor for 5-year mortality, higher age and greater proportion of comorbidities among EVAR patients may influence not only the choice of treatment modality, but also prognosis.
Title: Five-year survival after elective open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
Description:
Background and objective: Current evidence suggests short-term survival benefit from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) procedures, but this benefit is lost during long-term follow-up.
The aim of this study was to compare short- and mid-term all-cause mortality in patients with non-ruptured aneurysm treated by OSR and EVAR; and to assess the rate of complications and reinterventions, as well as to evaluate their impact on survival.
Methods: The medical records of the non-ruptured AAA patients undergoing OSR or EVAR between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2019 at Tartu University Hospital, Estonia, were retrospectively reviewed.
We gathered survival data from the national registry (mean follow-up period was 3.
7 ± 2.
3 years).
Results: A total of 225 non-ruptured AAA patients were treated operatively out of whom 95 (42.
2%) were EVAR and 130 (57.
8%) were OSR procedures.
The difference in estimated all-cause mortality between the OSR and EVAR groups at day 30 was statistically irrelevant (2.
3% vs 0%; p = 0.
140), but OSR patients showed statistically significantly higher 5 year survival compared with EVAR patients (75.
3% vs 50.
0%, p = 0.
002).
Complication and reintervention rates for the EVAR and OSR groups did not differ statistically (26.
3% vs 16.
9%, p = 0.
122; 10.
5% vs 11.
5%, p = 0.
981, respectively).
Multivariate analysis revealed that greater aneurysm diameter (p = 0.
012), EVAR procedure (p = 0.
016), male gender (p = 0.
023), and cerebrovascular diseases (p = 0.
028) were independently positively associated with 5-year mortality.
Conclusions: Thirty-day mortality, and complication and reintervention rates for EVAR and OSR after elective AAA repair were similar.
Although the EVAR procedure is an independent risk factor for 5-year mortality, higher age and greater proportion of comorbidities among EVAR patients may influence not only the choice of treatment modality, but also prognosis.

Related Results

Blood pressure, hypertension, and the risk of aortic aneurysm in the UK Biobank
Blood pressure, hypertension, and the risk of aortic aneurysm in the UK Biobank
Abstract Background Although an association between elevated blood pressure and risk of aortic aneurysm is established, f...
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm sealing: A systematic review of early outcomes
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm sealing: A systematic review of early outcomes
Objectives There has been a clear move towards endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms owing to better peri-operative outcomes compared with open surg...
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
Objectives To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia. ...
Hypertension and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Endovascular Treatment
Hypertension and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Endovascular Treatment
Introduction: Hypertension is a chronic condition characterized by persistently elevated blood pressure, which significantly contributes to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. ...
Deciphering Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Patient Diversity: Insights From a Cluster Analysis of the POPART Registry
Deciphering Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Patient Diversity: Insights From a Cluster Analysis of the POPART Registry
Background Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are the most common peripheral aneurysm. However, due to its rarity, the cumulative body of evidence regarding patient patt...

Back to Top