Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis vs. mechanical thrombectomy: a literature review
View through CrossRef
Background:
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Time is the single most critical factor in the management of patients presenting with AIS, where re-opening of occluded blood vessels is paramount. Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are two such therapies employed to reestablish cerebrovascular blood flow in patients with AIS. This review compares both IAT and MT according to their efficacy, safety profiles, recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events.
Methods:
Study abstraction from electronic search databases comprising PubMed/MEDLINE, ResearchGate, and the National Library of Medicine was used. Screening and selection of relevant articles were comprehensively conducted for this review. Direct comparisons between IAT and MT in terms of variables including recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events were warranted for study inclusion. Research determined to exhibit insufficient data or without comparable groups were subsequently excluded.
Results:
MT was prompter when executing procedures than IAT, achieving greater rates of recanalization. Both interventions displayed similar results regarding rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Despite current available data indicating MT to demonstrate more efficiency as a procedure, further research is needed to examine IAT in light of specific patient demographics, clinical presentation, and circumstances.
Conclusion:
This review elucidated that MT often takes less time peri-procedurally, achieving greater success in revascularization compared with that of IAT. Regarding mortality and sICH rates, IAT and MT comparison showed equivocal results. Thus, while making therapeutic decisions, it is important to consider the unique clinical features of each patient as well as the timing of interventions in order to maximize treatment outcomes.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Comparative effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis vs. mechanical thrombectomy: a literature review
Description:
Background:
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide.
Time is the single most critical factor in the management of patients presenting with AIS, where re-opening of occluded blood vessels is paramount.
Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are two such therapies employed to reestablish cerebrovascular blood flow in patients with AIS.
This review compares both IAT and MT according to their efficacy, safety profiles, recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events.
Methods:
Study abstraction from electronic search databases comprising PubMed/MEDLINE, ResearchGate, and the National Library of Medicine was used.
Screening and selection of relevant articles were comprehensively conducted for this review.
Direct comparisons between IAT and MT in terms of variables including recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events were warranted for study inclusion.
Research determined to exhibit insufficient data or without comparable groups were subsequently excluded.
Results:
MT was prompter when executing procedures than IAT, achieving greater rates of recanalization.
Both interventions displayed similar results regarding rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality.
Despite current available data indicating MT to demonstrate more efficiency as a procedure, further research is needed to examine IAT in light of specific patient demographics, clinical presentation, and circumstances.
Conclusion:
This review elucidated that MT often takes less time peri-procedurally, achieving greater success in revascularization compared with that of IAT.
Regarding mortality and sICH rates, IAT and MT comparison showed equivocal results.
Thus, while making therapeutic decisions, it is important to consider the unique clinical features of each patient as well as the timing of interventions in order to maximize treatment outcomes.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as a first-line approach for cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke in large vessels of the anterior circulation
Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as a first-line approach for cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke in large vessels of the anterior circulation
SubjectThis study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approaches for anterior circulation large vessel c...
Abstract WMP1: Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy: the THRACE Randomized Trial
Abstract WMP1: Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy: the THRACE Randomized Trial
Background and purpose:
The benefit of mechanical thrombectomy added to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke has been largely demonstrated. H...
Frequency of in-Hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis.
Frequency of in-Hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis.
Objective: To compare the frequency of in-hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis. Study Design: Descriptive...
Is thrombolysis beneficial in elderly patients with minor ischemic stroke?
Is thrombolysis beneficial in elderly patients with minor ischemic stroke?
IntroductionA pooled analysis of data from randomized controlled trials showed that thrombolysis is an effective treatment in patients older than 80 years of age with acute ischemi...
Higher-Quality Data Collection Is Critical to Establish the Safety and Efficacy of Pediatric Mechanical Thrombectomy
Higher-Quality Data Collection Is Critical to Establish the Safety and Efficacy of Pediatric Mechanical Thrombectomy
Background and Purpose:
Because children often have lifelong morbidity after stroke, there is considerable enthusiasm to pursue mechanical thrombectomy in child...
POST‐UK (Adjunctive Intra‐Arterial Urokinase After Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients With Large‐Vessel Occlusion Stroke): Study Protocol of a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open‐Label, Blinded‐End Point Trial
POST‐UK (Adjunctive Intra‐Arterial Urokinase After Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients With Large‐Vessel Occlusion Stroke): Study Protocol of a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open‐Label, Blinded‐End Point Trial
Background
Intra‐arterial infusion of an adjunctive thrombolytic agent after macrovascular recanalization by endovascular thrombectomy was regarded as a promisi...

