Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Is thrombolysis beneficial in elderly patients with minor ischemic stroke?

View through CrossRef
IntroductionA pooled analysis of data from randomized controlled trials showed that thrombolysis is an effective treatment in patients older than 80 years of age with acute ischemic stroke. However, the outcomes in daily clinical practice may differ from those observed in randomized controlled trials. Thus, the present study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of patients older than 80 years of age with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIA) admitted to Haukeland University Hospital in Norway, examining thrombolysis vs. non-thrombolysis treatment in patients.MethodsAll patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA who were older than 80 years of age and admitted to Haukeland University Hospital within the 4.5-h window after stroke onset between 2006 and 2020 were prospectively included in this observational study. Patients who received thrombolysis were compared to patients who did not receive thrombolysis. The endpoint was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score on day 7 or discharge if earlier. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were recorded repeatedly during their hospital stays.ResultsIn total, 808 patients were included. Thrombolysis was given to 393 (49%) patients. In patients with an NIHSS score of <3 (minor ischemic stroke) at admission, thrombolysis was associated with worse short-term outcomes (β = 0.13, p = 0.03), whereas thrombolysis was associated with better short-term outcomes in patients with an NIHSS score of ≥3 (major ischemic stroke) at admission (β = 0.12, p = 0.003). Thrombolysis appeared to be associated with neurological worsening in patients with an NIHSS score of <3 at admission. Excluding patients who underwent a thrombectomy did not change the results.ConclusionIn elderly patients with major ischemic stroke, thrombolysis was associated with better short-term outcomes. However, in patients with minor ischemic stroke, thrombolysis was associated with worse short-term outcomes. Several reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.
Title: Is thrombolysis beneficial in elderly patients with minor ischemic stroke?
Description:
IntroductionA pooled analysis of data from randomized controlled trials showed that thrombolysis is an effective treatment in patients older than 80 years of age with acute ischemic stroke.
However, the outcomes in daily clinical practice may differ from those observed in randomized controlled trials.
Thus, the present study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of patients older than 80 years of age with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIA) admitted to Haukeland University Hospital in Norway, examining thrombolysis vs.
non-thrombolysis treatment in patients.
MethodsAll patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA who were older than 80 years of age and admitted to Haukeland University Hospital within the 4.
5-h window after stroke onset between 2006 and 2020 were prospectively included in this observational study.
Patients who received thrombolysis were compared to patients who did not receive thrombolysis.
The endpoint was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score on day 7 or discharge if earlier.
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were recorded repeatedly during their hospital stays.
ResultsIn total, 808 patients were included.
Thrombolysis was given to 393 (49%) patients.
In patients with an NIHSS score of <3 (minor ischemic stroke) at admission, thrombolysis was associated with worse short-term outcomes (β = 0.
13, p = 0.
03), whereas thrombolysis was associated with better short-term outcomes in patients with an NIHSS score of ≥3 (major ischemic stroke) at admission (β = 0.
12, p = 0.
003).
Thrombolysis appeared to be associated with neurological worsening in patients with an NIHSS score of <3 at admission.
Excluding patients who underwent a thrombectomy did not change the results.
ConclusionIn elderly patients with major ischemic stroke, thrombolysis was associated with better short-term outcomes.
However, in patients with minor ischemic stroke, thrombolysis was associated with worse short-term outcomes.
Several reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.

Related Results

Iranian stroke model-how to involve health policymakers
Iranian stroke model-how to involve health policymakers
Stroke in Iran, with more than 83 million population, is a leading cause of disability and mortality in adults. Stroke has higher incidence in Iran comparing the global situation a...
Thrombolytic Therapy Rates and Stroke Severity
Thrombolytic Therapy Rates and Stroke Severity
Background and Purpose— We tested the hypothesis that higher proportions of patients with minor stroke being treated with thrombolysis contribute to increasing overall ...
Comparative Characterization of Candidate Molecular Markers in Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke
Comparative Characterization of Candidate Molecular Markers in Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke
According to epidemiological studies, the leading cause of morbidity, disability and mortality are cerebrovascular diseases, in particular ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. In rece...
CASE SERIES: EFFICACY OF THROMBOLYSIS USING INTRAVENOUS ALTEPLASE IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE WITH ONSET LESS THAN 6 HOURS (CODE STROKE)
CASE SERIES: EFFICACY OF THROMBOLYSIS USING INTRAVENOUS ALTEPLASE IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE WITH ONSET LESS THAN 6 HOURS (CODE STROKE)
Background: The gold standard therapy for acute ischemic stroke is timely reperfusion of ischemic brain tissue. Intravenous thrombolysis with tPA is the only proven medical therapy...
Frequency of in-Hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis.
Frequency of in-Hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis.
Objective: To compare the frequency of in-hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis. Study Design: Descriptive...

Back to Top