Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Inpatient dermatology referrals: what is the burden? A retrospective review of 14 years of dermatology inpatient referrals

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The lack of dermatological knowledge by nondermatologists is exposed by the increasing number of requests made for inpatient dermatological consultations. Patients have been commenced on inappropriate treatment because of poor dermatology training. Objectives To determine the burden and accuracy of inpatient dermatology referrals. Methods A retrospective cohort study using paper inpatient dermatology referrals from one health board (Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Wales, UK) between June 2007 and July 2021. Data analysis included timing of referrals, referring specialty, diagnosis and treatment. Descriptive statistics, using Excel, were used for analyses. Results The average number of referrals per year was 106 (range 79–166). The most frequent day of referral was Monday (26%). Most referrals were from medical teams (73%). Differential diagnosis was suggested by the referring team in 59% of referrals. In only 29% of referrals did the dermatology team agree with the differential diagnosis. There was a discrepancy in the correctness of diagnosis in all categories; however, paediatricians were most likely to offer a correct differential (44%). In 44% of referrals, treatment was commenced by the referring team, most commonly antibiotics. Conclusions There is an extra burden on dermatology teams to cover inpatients. Our figures highlight two important issues. Firstly, the need for better dermatological education in medical schools to improve diagnostic accuracy and management of conditions. Secondly, the need for an inpatient dermatology service to review inpatient referrals and advise in the diagnosis and management of dermatology cases on the wards and to protect the service from being uncoupled from the main hospital.
Title: Inpatient dermatology referrals: what is the burden? A retrospective review of 14 years of dermatology inpatient referrals
Description:
Abstract Background The lack of dermatological knowledge by nondermatologists is exposed by the increasing number of requests made for inpatient dermatological consultations.
Patients have been commenced on inappropriate treatment because of poor dermatology training.
Objectives To determine the burden and accuracy of inpatient dermatology referrals.
Methods A retrospective cohort study using paper inpatient dermatology referrals from one health board (Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Wales, UK) between June 2007 and July 2021.
Data analysis included timing of referrals, referring specialty, diagnosis and treatment.
Descriptive statistics, using Excel, were used for analyses.
Results The average number of referrals per year was 106 (range 79–166).
The most frequent day of referral was Monday (26%).
Most referrals were from medical teams (73%).
Differential diagnosis was suggested by the referring team in 59% of referrals.
In only 29% of referrals did the dermatology team agree with the differential diagnosis.
There was a discrepancy in the correctness of diagnosis in all categories; however, paediatricians were most likely to offer a correct differential (44%).
In 44% of referrals, treatment was commenced by the referring team, most commonly antibiotics.
Conclusions There is an extra burden on dermatology teams to cover inpatients.
Our figures highlight two important issues.
Firstly, the need for better dermatological education in medical schools to improve diagnostic accuracy and management of conditions.
Secondly, the need for an inpatient dermatology service to review inpatient referrals and advise in the diagnosis and management of dermatology cases on the wards and to protect the service from being uncoupled from the main hospital.

Related Results

Improving the quality of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison Team
Improving the quality of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison Team
AimsTo increase the percentage of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison (A&L) Team deemed to be of ‘good quality’. The A&L Team receives a large number of re...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Quantifying Participant Burden In Clinical Trials: Data From Prostate Cancer Rcts
Quantifying Participant Burden In Clinical Trials: Data From Prostate Cancer Rcts
Abstract Background: The restrictions implemented due to the COVID pandemic have underscored the importance of clinical research and trial methodology, while also highlight...
Machine learning and deep learning for classifying the justification of brain CT referrals
Machine learning and deep learning for classifying the justification of brain CT referrals
Abstract Objectives To train the machine and deep learning models to automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals in accordance with i...
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency maternal and under-five referrals in Sierra Leone: A cohort study
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency maternal and under-five referrals in Sierra Leone: A cohort study
Background In Sierra Leone, the National Emergency Medical Services (NEMS) was designed to facilitate maternal and under-five referrals. During the COVID-19 pandemic, health facili...

Back to Top