Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Machine learning and deep learning for classifying the justification of brain CT referrals
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Objectives
To train the machine and deep learning models to automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals in accordance with iGuide categorisation, and to determine if prediction models can generalise across multiple clinical sites and outperform human experts.
Methods
Adult brain computed tomography (CT) referrals from scans performed in three CT centres in Ireland in 2020 and 2021 were retrospectively collected. Two radiographers analysed the justification of 3000 randomly selected referrals using iGuide, with two consultant radiologists analysing the referrals with disagreement. Insufficient or duplicate referrals were discarded. The inter-rater agreement among radiographers and consultants was computed. A random split (4:1) was performed to apply machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to unstructured clinical indications to automate retrospective justification auditing with multi-class classification. The accuracy and macro-averaged F1 score of the best-performing classifier of each type on the training set were computed on the test set.
Results
42 referrals were ignored. 1909 (64.5%) referrals were justified, 811 (27.4%) were potentially justified, and 238 (8.1%) were unjustified. The agreement between radiographers (κ = 0.268) was lower than radiologists (κ = 0.460). The best-performing ML model was the bag-of-words-based gradient-boosting classifier achieving a 94.4% accuracy and a macro F1 of 0.94. DL models were inferior, with bi-directional long short-term memory achieving 92.3% accuracy, a macro F1 of 0.92, and outperforming multilayer perceptrons.
Conclusion
Interpreting unstructured clinical indications is challenging necessitating clinical decision support. ML and DL can generalise across multiple clinical sites, outperform human experts, and be used as an artificial intelligence-based iGuide interpreter when retrospectively vetting radiology referrals.
Clinical relevance statement
Healthcare vendors and clinical sites should consider developing and utilising artificial intelligence-enabled systems for justifying medical exposures. This would enable better implementation of imaging referral guidelines in clinical practices and reduce population dose burden, CT waiting lists, and wasteful use of resources.
Key Points
Significant variations exist among human experts in interpreting unstructured clinical indications/patient presentations.
Machine and deep learning can automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals according to iGuide categorisation.
Machine and deep learning can improve retrospective and prospective justification auditing for better implementation of imaging referral guidelines.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Machine learning and deep learning for classifying the justification of brain CT referrals
Description:
Abstract
Objectives
To train the machine and deep learning models to automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals in accordance with iGuide categorisation, and to determine if prediction models can generalise across multiple clinical sites and outperform human experts.
Methods
Adult brain computed tomography (CT) referrals from scans performed in three CT centres in Ireland in 2020 and 2021 were retrospectively collected.
Two radiographers analysed the justification of 3000 randomly selected referrals using iGuide, with two consultant radiologists analysing the referrals with disagreement.
Insufficient or duplicate referrals were discarded.
The inter-rater agreement among radiographers and consultants was computed.
A random split (4:1) was performed to apply machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to unstructured clinical indications to automate retrospective justification auditing with multi-class classification.
The accuracy and macro-averaged F1 score of the best-performing classifier of each type on the training set were computed on the test set.
Results
42 referrals were ignored.
1909 (64.
5%) referrals were justified, 811 (27.
4%) were potentially justified, and 238 (8.
1%) were unjustified.
The agreement between radiographers (κ = 0.
268) was lower than radiologists (κ = 0.
460).
The best-performing ML model was the bag-of-words-based gradient-boosting classifier achieving a 94.
4% accuracy and a macro F1 of 0.
94.
DL models were inferior, with bi-directional long short-term memory achieving 92.
3% accuracy, a macro F1 of 0.
92, and outperforming multilayer perceptrons.
Conclusion
Interpreting unstructured clinical indications is challenging necessitating clinical decision support.
ML and DL can generalise across multiple clinical sites, outperform human experts, and be used as an artificial intelligence-based iGuide interpreter when retrospectively vetting radiology referrals.
Clinical relevance statement
Healthcare vendors and clinical sites should consider developing and utilising artificial intelligence-enabled systems for justifying medical exposures.
This would enable better implementation of imaging referral guidelines in clinical practices and reduce population dose burden, CT waiting lists, and wasteful use of resources.
Key Points
Significant variations exist among human experts in interpreting unstructured clinical indications/patient presentations.
Machine and deep learning can automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals according to iGuide categorisation.
Machine and deep learning can improve retrospective and prospective justification auditing for better implementation of imaging referral guidelines.
Related Results
Can ChatGPT and Gemini justify brain CT referrals? A comparative study with human experts and a custom prediction model
Can ChatGPT and Gemini justify brain CT referrals? A comparative study with human experts and a custom prediction model
Abstract
Background
The poor uptake of imaging referral guidelines in Europe results in a substantial amount of inappropriate computed tomography...
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED]➢Item Name - Gro-X Brain➢ Creation - Natural Organic Compound➢ Incidental Effects - NA➢ Accessibility - Online➢ Rating - ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➢ Click Here To Visit - Official Website - ...
Improving the quality of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison Team
Improving the quality of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison Team
AimsTo increase the percentage of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison (A&L) Team deemed to be of ‘good quality’. The A&L Team receives a large number of re...
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency maternal and under-five referrals in Sierra Leone: A cohort study
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency maternal and under-five referrals in Sierra Leone: A cohort study
Background In Sierra Leone, the National Emergency Medical Services (NEMS) was designed to facilitate maternal and under-five referrals. During the COVID-19 pandemic, health facili...
Bleeding Disorder Referrals to Hematology Clinic: A Single Institution Experience
Bleeding Disorder Referrals to Hematology Clinic: A Single Institution Experience
BACKGROUND
Our tertiary care pediatric hematology/oncology/BMT service receives hundreds of referrals yearly for bleeding disorder evaluation both due to bleeding sy...
A Hybrid Approach Based on Deep CNN and Machine Learning Classifiers for the Tumor Segmentation and Classification in Brain MRI
A Hybrid Approach Based on Deep CNN and Machine Learning Classifiers for the Tumor Segmentation and Classification in Brain MRI
Conventional medical imaging and machine learning techniques are not perfect enough to correctly segment the brain tumor in MRI as the proper identification and segmentation of tum...
Integrating spiritual care into an ambulatory cancer center.
Integrating spiritual care into an ambulatory cancer center.
205 Background: Spiritual care is identified as a core component of quality oncologic care. Unmet spiritual needs can lead to worse quality of life, lower satisfaction with care, ...

