Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Machine learning and deep learning for classifying the justification of brain CT referrals
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Objectives
To train the machine and deep learning models to automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals in accordance with iGuide categorisation, and to determine if prediction models can generalise across multiple clinical sites and outperform human experts.
Methods
Adult brain computed tomography (CT) referrals from scans performed in three CT centres in Ireland in 2020 and 2021 were retrospectively collected. Two radiographers analysed the justification of 3000 randomly selected referrals using iGuide, with two consultant radiologists analysing the referrals with disagreement. Insufficient or duplicate referrals were discarded. The inter-rater agreement among radiographers and consultants was computed. A random split (4:1) was performed to apply machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to unstructured clinical indications to automate retrospective justification auditing with multi-class classification. The accuracy and macro-averaged F1 score of the best-performing classifier of each type on the training set were computed on the test set.
Results
42 referrals were ignored. 1909 (64.5%) referrals were justified, 811 (27.4%) were potentially justified, and 238 (8.1%) were unjustified. The agreement between radiographers (κ = 0.268) was lower than radiologists (κ = 0.460). The best-performing ML model was the bag-of-words-based gradient-boosting classifier achieving a 94.4% accuracy and a macro F1 of 0.94. DL models were inferior, with bi-directional long short-term memory achieving 92.3% accuracy, a macro F1 of 0.92, and outperforming multilayer perceptrons.
Conclusion
Interpreting unstructured clinical indications is challenging necessitating clinical decision support. ML and DL can generalise across multiple clinical sites, outperform human experts, and be used as an artificial intelligence-based iGuide interpreter when retrospectively vetting radiology referrals.
Clinical relevance statement
Healthcare vendors and clinical sites should consider developing and utilising artificial intelligence-enabled systems for justifying medical exposures. This would enable better implementation of imaging referral guidelines in clinical practices and reduce population dose burden, CT waiting lists, and wasteful use of resources.
Key Points
Significant variations exist among human experts in interpreting unstructured clinical indications/patient presentations.
Machine and deep learning can automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals according to iGuide categorisation.
Machine and deep learning can improve retrospective and prospective justification auditing for better implementation of imaging referral guidelines.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Machine learning and deep learning for classifying the justification of brain CT referrals
Description:
Abstract
Objectives
To train the machine and deep learning models to automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals in accordance with iGuide categorisation, and to determine if prediction models can generalise across multiple clinical sites and outperform human experts.
Methods
Adult brain computed tomography (CT) referrals from scans performed in three CT centres in Ireland in 2020 and 2021 were retrospectively collected.
Two radiographers analysed the justification of 3000 randomly selected referrals using iGuide, with two consultant radiologists analysing the referrals with disagreement.
Insufficient or duplicate referrals were discarded.
The inter-rater agreement among radiographers and consultants was computed.
A random split (4:1) was performed to apply machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to unstructured clinical indications to automate retrospective justification auditing with multi-class classification.
The accuracy and macro-averaged F1 score of the best-performing classifier of each type on the training set were computed on the test set.
Results
42 referrals were ignored.
1909 (64.
5%) referrals were justified, 811 (27.
4%) were potentially justified, and 238 (8.
1%) were unjustified.
The agreement between radiographers (κ = 0.
268) was lower than radiologists (κ = 0.
460).
The best-performing ML model was the bag-of-words-based gradient-boosting classifier achieving a 94.
4% accuracy and a macro F1 of 0.
94.
DL models were inferior, with bi-directional long short-term memory achieving 92.
3% accuracy, a macro F1 of 0.
92, and outperforming multilayer perceptrons.
Conclusion
Interpreting unstructured clinical indications is challenging necessitating clinical decision support.
ML and DL can generalise across multiple clinical sites, outperform human experts, and be used as an artificial intelligence-based iGuide interpreter when retrospectively vetting radiology referrals.
Clinical relevance statement
Healthcare vendors and clinical sites should consider developing and utilising artificial intelligence-enabled systems for justifying medical exposures.
This would enable better implementation of imaging referral guidelines in clinical practices and reduce population dose burden, CT waiting lists, and wasteful use of resources.
Key Points
Significant variations exist among human experts in interpreting unstructured clinical indications/patient presentations.
Machine and deep learning can automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals according to iGuide categorisation.
Machine and deep learning can improve retrospective and prospective justification auditing for better implementation of imaging referral guidelines.
Related Results
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Photo by Maxim Berg on Unsplash
INTRODUCTION
The brain is one of the most foundational parts of being human, and we are still learning about what makes humans unique. Advancements ...
Can ChatGPT and Gemini justify brain CT referrals? A comparative study with human experts and a custom prediction model
Can ChatGPT and Gemini justify brain CT referrals? A comparative study with human experts and a custom prediction model
Abstract
Background
The poor uptake of imaging referral guidelines in Europe results in a substantial amount of inappropriate computed tomography...
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED]➢Item Name - Gro-X Brain➢ Creation - Natural Organic Compound➢ Incidental Effects - NA➢ Accessibility - Online➢ Rating - ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➢ Click Here To Visit - Official Website - ...
Improving the quality of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison Team
Improving the quality of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison Team
AimsTo increase the percentage of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison (A&L) Team deemed to be of ‘good quality’. The A&L Team receives a large number of re...
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency maternal and under-five referrals in Sierra Leone: A cohort study
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency maternal and under-five referrals in Sierra Leone: A cohort study
Background In Sierra Leone, the National Emergency Medical Services (NEMS) was designed to facilitate maternal and under-five referrals. During the COVID-19 pandemic, health facili...
Inpatient dermatology referrals: what is the burden? A retrospective review of 14 years of dermatology inpatient referrals
Inpatient dermatology referrals: what is the burden? A retrospective review of 14 years of dermatology inpatient referrals
Abstract
Background
The lack of dermatological knowledge by nondermatologists is exposed by the increasing number of requests ma...
Comparison of Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnancy with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Planned Referrals Compared to Emergency Referrals Based on the Maternal Fetal Triage Index at Dr. Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia
Comparison of Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnancy with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Planned Referrals Compared to Emergency Referrals Based on the Maternal Fetal Triage Index at Dr. Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia
Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that attacks the skin and the musculoskeletal, kidney, neuropsychiatric, hematological, cardiovascular, pulm...

