Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Coiled Tubing Friction in Extended-Reach Wells
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The lateral reach and residual bottom hole assembly (BHA) loads in extended-reach wells strongly depend on the coiled tubing (CT) mechanical friction. Detailed CT friction modeling becomes crucial in the pre-job planning stage to ensure successful job predictability. However, current numerical simulators consider constant coefficients of friction (CoFs) that are determined from similar operations without taking into account the effects of the operational and downhole parameters on the CoF for a specific operation. This study outlines the modeling of CT friction force, CoF, and axial BHA loads depending on the operational and downhole parameters when a fluid hammer tool is used.
Recent theoretical, laboratory, and field data have established how CoF depends on the downhole parameters (Livescu and Watkins 2014; Livescu et al. 2014; Livescu and Craig 2015). Previously, these effects have not been considered in the CT numerical models, leading to significant CoF differences among available commercial simulators. For instance, the default CoFs in the current pre-job simulations for cased holes, when no lubricant or friction reducing tools such as fluid hammer tools and tractors are used, vary between 0.24 and 0.30 or even higher. This makes it extremely difficult to consistently evaluate and compare the friction reduction effects of lubricants, fluid hammer tools, and tractors in extended-reach wells, especially when the field operator may be consulting with several service companies utilizing different commercial force modelling software.
This study presents the CT force matching and fundamental physics based on modeled fluid forces, including radial forces, drag forces, and most importantly pressure forces on the CT friction forces due to fluid hammer tools. Extending the Method of Characteristics, regularly used for studying pressure pulses in straight pipes, the Perturbations Method also accounts for the helical shape of the CT. The new CT fluid hammer model is validated against laboratory data. This rigorous method for calculating the axial BHA load and reduced CT friction force due to radial vibrations can be easily implemented in currently available tubing force analysis (TFA) software for CT operations.
This novel approach, which uses detailed CT mechanical friction modeling to take into account parameters such as temperature, internal pressure, pumping rate, etc., improves predictions for CT reach in lateral wells. These findings broaden the current industry understanding of the CT mechanical friction modeling in extended-reach wells and show benefits for the industry when considering variable friction modeling in commercial CT simulators.
Title: Coiled Tubing Friction in Extended-Reach Wells
Description:
Abstract
The lateral reach and residual bottom hole assembly (BHA) loads in extended-reach wells strongly depend on the coiled tubing (CT) mechanical friction.
Detailed CT friction modeling becomes crucial in the pre-job planning stage to ensure successful job predictability.
However, current numerical simulators consider constant coefficients of friction (CoFs) that are determined from similar operations without taking into account the effects of the operational and downhole parameters on the CoF for a specific operation.
This study outlines the modeling of CT friction force, CoF, and axial BHA loads depending on the operational and downhole parameters when a fluid hammer tool is used.
Recent theoretical, laboratory, and field data have established how CoF depends on the downhole parameters (Livescu and Watkins 2014; Livescu et al.
2014; Livescu and Craig 2015).
Previously, these effects have not been considered in the CT numerical models, leading to significant CoF differences among available commercial simulators.
For instance, the default CoFs in the current pre-job simulations for cased holes, when no lubricant or friction reducing tools such as fluid hammer tools and tractors are used, vary between 0.
24 and 0.
30 or even higher.
This makes it extremely difficult to consistently evaluate and compare the friction reduction effects of lubricants, fluid hammer tools, and tractors in extended-reach wells, especially when the field operator may be consulting with several service companies utilizing different commercial force modelling software.
This study presents the CT force matching and fundamental physics based on modeled fluid forces, including radial forces, drag forces, and most importantly pressure forces on the CT friction forces due to fluid hammer tools.
Extending the Method of Characteristics, regularly used for studying pressure pulses in straight pipes, the Perturbations Method also accounts for the helical shape of the CT.
The new CT fluid hammer model is validated against laboratory data.
This rigorous method for calculating the axial BHA load and reduced CT friction force due to radial vibrations can be easily implemented in currently available tubing force analysis (TFA) software for CT operations.
This novel approach, which uses detailed CT mechanical friction modeling to take into account parameters such as temperature, internal pressure, pumping rate, etc.
, improves predictions for CT reach in lateral wells.
These findings broaden the current industry understanding of the CT mechanical friction modeling in extended-reach wells and show benefits for the industry when considering variable friction modeling in commercial CT simulators.
Related Results
Rigless Well Intervention Using Tubing Patch Technology Helps Restore Inactive Wells
Rigless Well Intervention Using Tubing Patch Technology Helps Restore Inactive Wells
Abstract
This paper provides in-depth analysis of a low-cost solution to economically sustain production and avoid high workover costs. This paper conducts the techn...
Prebending Coiled Tubing and Its Fatigue Life Prediction
Prebending Coiled Tubing and Its Fatigue Life Prediction
Coiled tubing is widely used in oil drilling and production operations. However, extreme high stress variation of coiled tubing during the processes of pulling out, rolling in the ...
Jointed Tubing Injector Snubbing on Extended Reach Wells
Jointed Tubing Injector Snubbing on Extended Reach Wells
Abstract
OBJECTIVE / SCOPE
An injector has been developed that is able to continuously move conventional jointed tubing in and o...
Innovative Coiled Tubing Technology to Improve Performance in Horizontal Completions
Innovative Coiled Tubing Technology to Improve Performance in Horizontal Completions
Abstract
Recent technological innovations in seismic imaging, directional drilling and hydraulic fracturing and other completion techniques have made development of ...
Improving Efficiency of Coiled Tubing Operations on Vankor Field
Improving Efficiency of Coiled Tubing Operations on Vankor Field
Abstract
Coiled tubing is commonly used as an intervention tool for treatment delivery in long horizontal wells. As with any intervention tool, however, coiled tubin...
Metal-Polymer Coiled Tubing
Metal-Polymer Coiled Tubing
Abstract
Metal-polymer coiled tubing (MCT) are flexible pipes based on a copolymer reinforced with steel tape, wires and ropes. During the research was proposed and ...
Friction Pressure Losses of Fluids Flowing in Circular Conduits
Friction Pressure Losses of Fluids Flowing in Circular Conduits
Abstract
Fluids are pumped through circular conduits in various operations in thepetroleum industry. These fluids may be Newtonian or non-Newtonian, clean orpropp...
Coiled Tubing Working Life Prediction
Coiled Tubing Working Life Prediction
ABSTRACT
Failure of coiled tubing, due to the repeated bending and plastic deformation of coiled tubing on and off the reel and gooseneck, is of great concern in coi...

