Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Russian-Chechen relations in XVI–XVII centuries
View through CrossRef
The following paper investigates the Russian-Chechen relations in XVIXVII centuries. The authors note that the Caucasus was in the sphere of Russian foreign policy at the time of the Russian centralized state formation. With the annexation of the Astrakhan khanate, Russia came to the Caucasus border and the Caucasian direction started to occupy a leading place in the Eastern policy of the tsarist government. The Caucasus in the XVI century was an object of a tense struggle between the two most powerful States of the then Middle East Ottoman Empire and Safavid Iran and at the same time a bridgehead, where there was a constant threat to the southern outskirts of Russia from these States and the Crimean khanate. The strengthening of Russia on the Caucasian lands could become the most reliable means to ensure the safety of the South of Russia. So in the XVII and XVII centuries, the North Caucasus was Russias military-strategic interest or, in modern language, a geopolitical one. Chechnya came under the influence of Russia in 1567, when the first Russian militarized city Terek in the North Caucasus was founded. For the peoples of the North Caucasus and of Chechnya the appearance of a Russian fortress on their land was of great political importance. Thus, it was vital for Russia to gain a foothold in the North Caucasus, as the enemy (Iran and Turkey) could do it, which was unsafe for Russias southern borders. It was during this period (late sixteenth century) when close military and political ties of the Moscow government and the Chechens were established. The Moscow government was interested in Chechnya because of its geographical location the immediate proximity to the towns of Terek and the fact that its territory was the most convenient means of communication with Georgia. The relationship between Chechnya and Russia at the end of XVI first half of XVII century was almost an ideal model of a peaceful rapprochement of the Chechen with the Moscow government for those conditions and at that time. The Russian authorities did not interfere in the internal affairs of the Chechen societies, they did not impose their own rules or laws, being satisfied with the results of the hostages, the payment of tribute and, if necessary, temporary military service. This led to the fact that in the XVII century allied relations of Chechnya societies with Russia were established. However, at the end of the XVII century Russian-Caucasian connection was significantly weakened.
Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
Title: The Russian-Chechen relations in XVI–XVII centuries
Description:
The following paper investigates the Russian-Chechen relations in XVIXVII centuries.
The authors note that the Caucasus was in the sphere of Russian foreign policy at the time of the Russian centralized state formation.
With the annexation of the Astrakhan khanate, Russia came to the Caucasus border and the Caucasian direction started to occupy a leading place in the Eastern policy of the tsarist government.
The Caucasus in the XVI century was an object of a tense struggle between the two most powerful States of the then Middle East Ottoman Empire and Safavid Iran and at the same time a bridgehead, where there was a constant threat to the southern outskirts of Russia from these States and the Crimean khanate.
The strengthening of Russia on the Caucasian lands could become the most reliable means to ensure the safety of the South of Russia.
So in the XVII and XVII centuries, the North Caucasus was Russias military-strategic interest or, in modern language, a geopolitical one.
Chechnya came under the influence of Russia in 1567, when the first Russian militarized city Terek in the North Caucasus was founded.
For the peoples of the North Caucasus and of Chechnya the appearance of a Russian fortress on their land was of great political importance.
Thus, it was vital for Russia to gain a foothold in the North Caucasus, as the enemy (Iran and Turkey) could do it, which was unsafe for Russias southern borders.
It was during this period (late sixteenth century) when close military and political ties of the Moscow government and the Chechens were established.
The Moscow government was interested in Chechnya because of its geographical location the immediate proximity to the towns of Terek and the fact that its territory was the most convenient means of communication with Georgia.
The relationship between Chechnya and Russia at the end of XVI first half of XVII century was almost an ideal model of a peaceful rapprochement of the Chechen with the Moscow government for those conditions and at that time.
The Russian authorities did not interfere in the internal affairs of the Chechen societies, they did not impose their own rules or laws, being satisfied with the results of the hostages, the payment of tribute and, if necessary, temporary military service.
This led to the fact that in the XVII century allied relations of Chechnya societies with Russia were established.
However, at the end of the XVII century Russian-Caucasian connection was significantly weakened.
Related Results
СОВЕТСКАЯ ПРАКТИКА САМООПРЕДЕЛЕНИЯ ЧЕЧЕНСКОГО НАРОДА: НАЧАЛЬНЫЙ ЭТАП (1920-1922 ГГ.)
СОВЕТСКАЯ ПРАКТИКА САМООПРЕДЕЛЕНИЯ ЧЕЧЕНСКОГО НАРОДА: НАЧАЛЬНЫЙ ЭТАП (1920-1922 ГГ.)
После окончания гражданской войны и триумфа советской власти на Северном Кавказе по инициативе большевиков активизировался процесс национально-государственного строительства. И в э...
SOME QUESTIONS ON THE HISTORICAL DEMOGRAPHY OF ARTSAKH (XVI-XVII CENTURIES)
SOME QUESTIONS ON THE HISTORICAL DEMOGRAPHY OF ARTSAKH (XVI-XVII CENTURIES)
This article covers several issues related to the historical demography of Artsakh in the XVI-XVII centuries, based on the information from the primary sources. To this end, we hav...
МОЛИТВЫ СУЛАЕВА МАГОМЕДА
МОЛИТВЫ СУЛАЕВА МАГОМЕДА
В статье рассматривается общий для чеченского фольклора и чеченской литературы лирический жанр «доӀа» («молитва»), который имеет одновременно признаки эпического и драматического х...
Reactions to the War as Identity Stories: Reflections of the Artists Aleksandr Brener, Alexey Kallima, Aslan Goisum on the Chechen War
Reactions to the War as Identity Stories: Reflections of the Artists Aleksandr Brener, Alexey Kallima, Aslan Goisum on the Chechen War
The article examines the pieces of art by artists Alexander Brener (1990s), Alexey Kallima (2000s) and Aslan Goisum (2010s) and their reception by art criticism and the public as e...
Natural mineral waters of the Chechen Republic: current usage and prospects for development
Natural mineral waters of the Chechen Republic: current usage and prospects for development
Abstract
The article analyzes the natural mineral waters of the Chechen Republic which are a leading factor in the formation of a sanatorium and health resort base. ...
ХАРАКТЕР СОЮЗНИЧЕСКИХ СВЯЗЕЙ ШИХ-МУРЗЫ ОКОЦКОГО С МОСКОВСКИМ ЦАРСКИМ ДВОРОМ И ИХ ПРЕСЕЧЕНИЕ В 1595–1596 ГГ.
ХАРАКТЕР СОЮЗНИЧЕСКИХ СВЯЗЕЙ ШИХ-МУРЗЫ ОКОЦКОГО С МОСКОВСКИМ ЦАРСКИМ ДВОРОМ И ИХ ПРЕСЕЧЕНИЕ В 1595–1596 ГГ.
Исследованный материал по ранним русско-чеченским связям показывает, что использован далеко не весь научный потенциал имеющихся источников. Остаются темы и нюансы, требующие дополн...
Protracted Conflicts in Afghanistan and Chechnya: American Perspectives on Russian Experience
Protracted Conflicts in Afghanistan and Chechnya: American Perspectives on Russian Experience
Since the early 1980s, American scholarly and analytical literature has discussed the effectiveness of Soviet, and subsequently Russian, management of low-intensity conflicts. Thou...
Kuban State University: Russian Philology on the 45th Parallel
Kuban State University: Russian Philology on the 45th Parallel
The article represents the history and modernity of philological scholarship in Kuban State University, the oldest university of classical education in the south of Russia, which h...

