Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Power to (Not) Decide: Implications of Baker’s Fifth Factor for War Powers Reform

View through CrossRef
<p><i><span>Though the Constitution charges Congress with the responsibility to “declare War,” modern Presidents have unilaterally deployed sustained military force around the world with regularity. Greater presidential unilateralism in armed conflict is not without controversy, and Congress has passed legislation to rein in the Commander in Chief. Efforts to shift the allocation of the war powers away from the President have not been successful, however, partially because the courts are rarely willing to reach the merits of suits challenging the President’s authority to act on his own. Relying on a handful of (non)justiciability doctrines—most notably, the textual considerations set out in </span></i><span>Baker v. Carr</span><i><span>—the courts have almost universally dismissed such disputes as beyond the judicial power to decide, and war powers reformers have crafted their efforts accordingly.</span></i></p><i><span>This Note argues that </span></i><span>Baker</span><i><span>’s textual factors do not tell the whole story. The courts’ lack of military expertise or political accountability make it infeasible for them to adjudicate war powers disputes without endangering U.S. lives and foreign policy interests. </span></i><span>Baker</span><i><span>’s more prudential fifth factor, therefore, counsels against ruling at all in such cases, even if the textual factors do not. By elaborating and responding to these prudential arguments for nonjusticiability in the war powers arena, this Note offers a more complete account of justiciability issues in war powers disputes and highlights a shortcoming of recent war powers reform efforts. The Note concludes, however, that the fifth factor is not an insurmountable barrier: by codifying the remedy applicable where courts find violations of the WPR, Congress can take critical value judgments out of courts’ hands and thereby empower them to finally adjudicate war powers suits on their merits.</span></i>
Elsevier BV
Title: The Power to (Not) Decide: Implications of Baker’s Fifth Factor for War Powers Reform
Description:
<p><i><span>Though the Constitution charges Congress with the responsibility to “declare War,” modern Presidents have unilaterally deployed sustained military force around the world with regularity.
Greater presidential unilateralism in armed conflict is not without controversy, and Congress has passed legislation to rein in the Commander in Chief.
Efforts to shift the allocation of the war powers away from the President have not been successful, however, partially because the courts are rarely willing to reach the merits of suits challenging the President’s authority to act on his own.
Relying on a handful of (non)justiciability doctrines—most notably, the textual considerations set out in </span></i><span>Baker v.
Carr</span><i><span>—the courts have almost universally dismissed such disputes as beyond the judicial power to decide, and war powers reformers have crafted their efforts accordingly.
</span></i></p><i><span>This Note argues that </span></i><span>Baker</span><i><span>’s textual factors do not tell the whole story.
The courts’ lack of military expertise or political accountability make it infeasible for them to adjudicate war powers disputes without endangering U.
S.
lives and foreign policy interests.
</span></i><span>Baker</span><i><span>’s more prudential fifth factor, therefore, counsels against ruling at all in such cases, even if the textual factors do not.
By elaborating and responding to these prudential arguments for nonjusticiability in the war powers arena, this Note offers a more complete account of justiciability issues in war powers disputes and highlights a shortcoming of recent war powers reform efforts.
The Note concludes, however, that the fifth factor is not an insurmountable barrier: by codifying the remedy applicable where courts find violations of the WPR, Congress can take critical value judgments out of courts’ hands and thereby empower them to finally adjudicate war powers suits on their merits.
</span></i>.

Related Results

KEDUDUKAN AHLI BAHASA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 47/PID.SUS/2019/PN. MGT)
KEDUDUKAN AHLI BAHASA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 47/PID.SUS/2019/PN. MGT)
<em><span id="page3R_mcid52" class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*125.30px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*539.11px); font-size: calc(va...
The Clinton Administration and War Powers
The Clinton Administration and War Powers
The strongest of all governmental powers is the power to engage in war; and the strongest challenge for constitutionalism is to bring the war power of the state under meaningful co...
Middle and Emerging Power in Foreign Policy Analysis
Middle and Emerging Power in Foreign Policy Analysis
This paper argues that the concepts of ‘middle powers’ and ‘emerging powers’ remain analytically ambiguous and often conflated, owing to overlapping parameters and inconsistent the...
SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE RUSSIAN SYSTEM OF FISCAL FEDERALISM
SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE RUSSIAN SYSTEM OF FISCAL FEDERALISM
The aim of the research is to identify the main trends in separation of powers of the Russian Federation and subjects of the Russian Federation in the context of the new federal la...
Editorial
Editorial
On Friday 27th July 2012 the conference on the "Green Paper on Land Reform: Challenges and Opportunities" was held at the Hakunamatata Estate in Muldersdrift. The conference was a ...
ANALISIS KETERKAITAN KEKERASAN DENGAN PERBUATAN CABUL TERHADAP ANAK
ANALISIS KETERKAITAN KEKERASAN DENGAN PERBUATAN CABUL TERHADAP ANAK
<span id="page3R_mcid85" class="markedContent"><em><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*399.05px); font-size: calc(var...
Modelado de un Recuperador Dinámico de Tensión para el Mejoramiento de la Calidad de la Onda de Tensión
Modelado de un Recuperador Dinámico de Tensión para el Mejoramiento de la Calidad de la Onda de Tensión
[1]          R. C. Dugan, H. W. Beaty, y S. Santoso, Electrical Power Systems Quality, Third edition. Tata McGraw Hill Education, 2012.[2]          J. Arrilaga y N. R. Watson, Powe...

Back to Top