KEDUDUKAN AHLI BAHASA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 47/PID.SUS/2019/PN. MGT)

<em><span id="page3R_mcid52" class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*125.30px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*539.11px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.989637);" dir="ltr">This study aims to determine how the role of linguists and criminal law</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*435.07px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*539.11px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.956646);" dir="ltr">experts in proving </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*551.35px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.937376);" dir="ltr">defamation cases through twitter. In addition, it is also to know the judge's consideration in deciding the </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*563.59px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.932286);" dir="ltr">case of defamation through twitter. The method used in this research is normative or doctrinal research. </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*575.71px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.933567);" dir="ltr">Legal materials include</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*184.22px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*575.71px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.961071);" dir="ltr">primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, the legal materials are </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*587.95px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.901211);" dir="ltr">arranged systematically, studied, then compared and a conclusion is drawn in relation to the problem under </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*600.19px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.950598);" dir="ltr">study. The collection of legal materials in this research uses court</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*361.99px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*600.19px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.922624);" dir="ltr">decision study techniques. The legal </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*612.34px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.912428);" dir="ltr">material analysis technique used is a qualitative analysis technique that uses a deductive thinking pattern. </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*624.58px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.908156);" dir="ltr">The use of the deduction method stems from the submission of major premises (general statements), then </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*636.82px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.924643);" dir="ltr">minor p</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*115.82px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*636.82px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.897693);" dir="ltr">remises (special statements) are submitted, from the two premises a conclusion is drawn. Based on </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*649.06px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.923003);" dir="ltr">the results of research and discussion, it is concluded that experts have a position as evidence based on </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*661.18px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.949071);" dir="ltr">Article 184 paragraph (1) letter b of the Criminal P</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*293.93px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*661.18px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.909727);" dir="ltr">rocedure Code (KUHAP). The results showed that the </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*673.42px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.894614);" dir="ltr">consideration of the panel of Judges in deciding to impose punishment on the Defendant was in accordance </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*685.66px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.902468);" dir="ltr">with Article 45 paragraph (3) Jo. Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Numbe</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*484.18px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*685.66px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.920877);" dir="ltr">r 19 of </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*697.90px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.887688);" dir="ltr">2016 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*710.02px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.916895);" dir="ltr">Information and Transactions.</span></span></em><p><em><span id="page3R_mcid53" class="markedContent"><strong><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*722.26px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.869197);" dir="ltr">Keywords:</span></strong><a href="/verstek/article/view/71624"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*127.82px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*722.26px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.914125);" dir="ltr"> Expert role; defamation;</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*226.85px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*722.26px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.907869);" dir="ltr">judge's consideration</span></a></span></em></p>