Prevalence of dyslipidaemia and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target attainment: a descriptive cross-sectional study among adults in the Western Province of Sri Lanka

Objectives To assess the prevalence of dyslipidaemia and associated risk factors, and evaluate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target attainment among adults in the Western Province of Sri Lanka. Design Cross-sectional epidemiological study. Setting Western province, Sri Lanka. Participants Participants were recruited through a community-based survey of non-institutionalised adults aged ≥20 years residing in the Western Province for at least 1 year (n=1800), using multistage stratified random cluster sampling. Primary outcome Dyslipidaemia was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Programme/Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Prevalence estimates are presented with 95% CIs. Multiple logistic regression results are reported as adjusted ORs with 95% CIs. Secondary outcome Cardiovascular risk in participants aged ≥40 years was assessed using the WHO laboratory-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk chart for South-East Asia. Achievement of LDL-C targets was evaluated according to the Sri Lankan guidelines on management for dyslipidaemia management. Results Data from 1333 subjects were analysed. Mean age was 49.8 (±14.9) years. The majority were females (63.6%). The age-sex standardised prevalence of any form of dyslipidaemia was 73.3% (95% CI 70.9% to 75.7%). Age standardised prevalence in females was 77.1% (95% CI 74.3% to 79.9) and males was 69.3% (95% CI 65.3% to 73.3%). The most prevalent type of dyslipidaemia was low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (46.6%, 95% CI 43.9% to 49.3%), followed by high LDL-C (32.5%, 95% CI 30.0% to 35.0%) and high triglycerides (21.7%, 95% CI 19.5% to 23.9%). Low HDL-C was positively associated with smoking (OR: 1.89, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.18) and inversely with male sex (OR: 0.29, 95% CI 19 to 0.45) and physical activity (OR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.99). Elevated LDL-C was associated with male sex (OR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.89), diabetes (OR: 5.34, 95% CI 3.53 to 8.08), and hypertension (OR: 1.62, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.23). Male sex (OR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.18), diabetes (OR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.58) and hypertension (OR: 1.81, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.91) were positively associated with elevated triglycerides, whereas urban sector (OR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91) was protective. Physical activity (OR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.98) and male sex (OR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.89) inversely associated with any form of dyslipidaemia, whereas diabetes (OR: 7.08, 95% CI 3.99 to 12.55), hypertension (OR: 1.93, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.73), and body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.2) were positively associated. The majority of participants (66.6%) had a <10% 10-year CVD risk, of whom 64.9% (95% CI 60.1 to 69.8) did not achieve the LDL-C target of <3.0 mmol/L. Conclusions Three-fourths of adults in Western Province, Sri Lanka had any form of dyslipidaemia, more common in females. Low HDL-C was the most frequent abnormality. Most participants aged above 40 years were at low cardiovascular risk, yet two-thirds failed to meet LDL-C targets. Non-communicable disease prevention in Sri Lanka should expand through population-wide strategies, including awareness campaigns, promoting self-monitoring, targeted education and surveillance to evaluate interventions.