Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Impact of primary care providers on patient screening mammography and initial presentation in an underserved clinical setting.
View through CrossRef
8 Background: Screening mammography (SM) is a routinely used modality for earlier detection of breast cancer and is effective in reducing breast cancer-related morbidity and mortality. A better understanding of the impact of access to primary care physician (PCP), on the screening protocols and stage presentation, is needed to address the issue of breast cancer stage disparity amongst underserved women. Methods: A retrospective chart review of the electronic medical record, for breast cancer patients newly diagnosed from 2012-2013, was performed using the tumor registry at Bellevue Hospital Center, the largest public hospital in New York City. Patients with recurrent breast cancer, stage IV breast cancer, and those that weren’t managed surgically at our institution, were excluded from the study. Data including patient demographics, established relationship with PCP, and screening mammogram and palpable mass at presentation, were obtained and analyzed using SPSS Statistics Software. Results: 173 patients were included in the study of which 5 presented with bilateral breast cancer (n = 178). The majority of the patients seen at our institution were from minority groups, primarily Hispanic (34%) and Chinese (23%). 129 patients (72%) had a PCP at the time of diagnosis versus 49 patients (28%) without a PCP. Patients without a PCP were more likely to have a palpable breast mass at presentation, compared to patients with a PCP (73% vs. 42% respectively, p < 0.05). Furthermore, only 32 % of patients without a PCP had a SM at time of presentation, compared to 61% of patients with a PCP (p = 0.003). Overall, in the group of patients with a PCP, the majority presented with stage I breast cancer (43%), followed by 29% with stage 0. In comparison, the majority of patient without a PCP presented with stage II (41%), followed by 29% with stage I (p = 0.019). Conclusions: There is a benefit for patients with access to a PCP, as it leads to a higher likelihood of breast cancer detection via SM, as opposed to a symptomatic presentation, such as a palpable mass. Therefore, these patients are more likely to be diagnosed with an earlier stage of breast cancer, which improves their mortality.
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Impact of primary care providers on patient screening mammography and initial presentation in an underserved clinical setting.
Description:
8 Background: Screening mammography (SM) is a routinely used modality for earlier detection of breast cancer and is effective in reducing breast cancer-related morbidity and mortality.
A better understanding of the impact of access to primary care physician (PCP), on the screening protocols and stage presentation, is needed to address the issue of breast cancer stage disparity amongst underserved women.
Methods: A retrospective chart review of the electronic medical record, for breast cancer patients newly diagnosed from 2012-2013, was performed using the tumor registry at Bellevue Hospital Center, the largest public hospital in New York City.
Patients with recurrent breast cancer, stage IV breast cancer, and those that weren’t managed surgically at our institution, were excluded from the study.
Data including patient demographics, established relationship with PCP, and screening mammogram and palpable mass at presentation, were obtained and analyzed using SPSS Statistics Software.
Results: 173 patients were included in the study of which 5 presented with bilateral breast cancer (n = 178).
The majority of the patients seen at our institution were from minority groups, primarily Hispanic (34%) and Chinese (23%).
129 patients (72%) had a PCP at the time of diagnosis versus 49 patients (28%) without a PCP.
Patients without a PCP were more likely to have a palpable breast mass at presentation, compared to patients with a PCP (73% vs.
42% respectively, p < 0.
05).
Furthermore, only 32 % of patients without a PCP had a SM at time of presentation, compared to 61% of patients with a PCP (p = 0.
003).
Overall, in the group of patients with a PCP, the majority presented with stage I breast cancer (43%), followed by 29% with stage 0.
In comparison, the majority of patient without a PCP presented with stage II (41%), followed by 29% with stage I (p = 0.
019).
Conclusions: There is a benefit for patients with access to a PCP, as it leads to a higher likelihood of breast cancer detection via SM, as opposed to a symptomatic presentation, such as a palpable mass.
Therefore, these patients are more likely to be diagnosed with an earlier stage of breast cancer, which improves their mortality.
Related Results
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Abstract IA15: Neighborhood factors and changes in mammography screening rates in response to promotora intervention in Latinas
Abstract IA15: Neighborhood factors and changes in mammography screening rates in response to promotora intervention in Latinas
Abstract
Latinas have relatively low rates of mammography screening participation, which may contribute to later stage of breast cancer at diagnosis for Latinas, and...
Cost–benefit analysis of mammography screening: the perspective of Nigerian healthcare providers
Cost–benefit analysis of mammography screening: the perspective of Nigerian healthcare providers
Introduction
There is no national breast cancer screening implemented in Nigeria. The National Cancer Control Plan (NCCP) has a goal of making screening services ...
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
Abstract
Background
There is growing concern that routine mammography screening is overused among older women. Successful and equitable de-implementation of mammography wi...
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
Abstract
Background
There is growing concern that routine mammography screening is overused among older women. Successful and equitable de-implementation of mammography wi...
Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic
Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic
Background: Most late-stage breast cancer occurs in those who have never been screened. Uninsured women have lower screening rates than insured women. Student-run free clinics (SRF...
Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model
Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model
Abstract
Background
Mammography screening is the main method for early detection of breast cancer in Norway. Few studies have focused on psychologic...

