Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy.

View through CrossRef
Objective: To determine the quality of colonoscopy in terms of adenoma detection rate in the existing local settings. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Department of Gastroenterology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Period: February 2022 to August 2022. Methods: We analyzed patients having age 18 years or older, of any gender, and who had colonoscopy indications and were required to have a screening colonoscopy for diagnostic purposes. The number of procedures with at least one polyp or adenoma was classified as the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Result: Total 210 patients were enrolled into the study with median age of 41.5 (29.8-56.3) years and majority were males (n=46, 69.5%). The most frequent indication for colonoscopy was constipation (n=72, 34.3%) followed by bleeding (n=78, 37.1%), chronic diarrhea (n=36, 17.1%), both constipation and diarrhea (n=21, 10%) and altered bowel habits (n=3, 1.4%). PDR and ADR were 16.2% (n=34) and 10% (n=21) respectively. Age was significantly higher among patients who were found to have polyp (p<0.001) and adenomas (p<0.001). Frequency of polyps (p=0.010) and adenomas (p=0.007) were significantly higher in male patients. Conclusion: The current research discovered a low rate of adenoma detection in people receiving colorectal cancer screening, and it did not meet the quality benchmarks that have been associated with higher rates of early diagnosis and cancer prevention.
Title: Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy.
Description:
Objective: To determine the quality of colonoscopy in terms of adenoma detection rate in the existing local settings.
Study Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Department of Gastroenterology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Period: February 2022 to August 2022.
Methods: We analyzed patients having age 18 years or older, of any gender, and who had colonoscopy indications and were required to have a screening colonoscopy for diagnostic purposes.
The number of procedures with at least one polyp or adenoma was classified as the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR).
Result: Total 210 patients were enrolled into the study with median age of 41.
5 (29.
8-56.
3) years and majority were males (n=46, 69.
5%).
The most frequent indication for colonoscopy was constipation (n=72, 34.
3%) followed by bleeding (n=78, 37.
1%), chronic diarrhea (n=36, 17.
1%), both constipation and diarrhea (n=21, 10%) and altered bowel habits (n=3, 1.
4%).
PDR and ADR were 16.
2% (n=34) and 10% (n=21) respectively.
Age was significantly higher among patients who were found to have polyp (p<0.
001) and adenomas (p<0.
001).
Frequency of polyps (p=0.
010) and adenomas (p=0.
007) were significantly higher in male patients.
Conclusion: The current research discovered a low rate of adenoma detection in people receiving colorectal cancer screening, and it did not meet the quality benchmarks that have been associated with higher rates of early diagnosis and cancer prevention.

Related Results

Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma: A Case Series and Literature Review
Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma: A Case Series and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) is a rare malignant salivary gland tumor that can lead to severe complications and carries a risk of distant metastasi...
Multiple, zonal and multi‐zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy
Multiple, zonal and multi‐zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy
BackgroundThe safety and diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy depend on the quality of colon cleansing. The adenoma detection rate is usually used as a quality measurement score.Obje...
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING: A LITERATURE REVIEW
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATION IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer globally and remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite the effectiveness of colonosc...
G-EYE Colonoscopy Is Superior to Standard Colonoscopy for Increasing Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate
G-EYE Colonoscopy Is Superior to Standard Colonoscopy for Increasing Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate
Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Most CRCs develop from malignant potent...
Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: ARandomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: ARandomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Introduction: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy plays an important role in the evaluation of the colon. Many methods for preparing the colon for colonoscopy do not work well. Aim:...
Effect of Helicobacter pylori enrichment in adenoma on clinical and pathological features of colorectal adenoma
Effect of Helicobacter pylori enrichment in adenoma on clinical and pathological features of colorectal adenoma
Abstract Objective To observe the enrichment of Helicobacter pylori in adenoma tissues of patients with colorectal adenoma and analyze its effect on the clinical and pathol...
Improvement in Adenoma Detection Rate with Distal Attachment Device Endo-Wing™-Assisted Colonoscopy: A Randomized Control Trial
Improvement in Adenoma Detection Rate with Distal Attachment Device Endo-Wing™-Assisted Colonoscopy: A Randomized Control Trial
Aim: Endo-Wing™ is a soft silicone device with six wing-like projections attached at the end of the colonoscope that provides superior visualization by flattening the colonic fold ...
249 Is Stool DNA Test More Specific for Proximal or Distal Neoplasia?
249 Is Stool DNA Test More Specific for Proximal or Distal Neoplasia?
INTRODUCTION: A handful of studies evaluated stool DNA test as a screening method but there is little to no data on the location of the “positive findings” detected on ...

Back to Top