Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Occupational radiation exposure of radiologic technologists in Interventional neuroradiology

View through CrossRef
Abstract Purpose With the rising number of angiographic interventional procedures, occupational radiation exposure is becoming increasingly relevant. As even low doses may contribute to stochastic health effects, enhanced radiological protection measures are warranted. This study aimed to systematically quantify the radiation exposure of radiologic technologists under routine clinical conditions and in an experimental setting. Methods Radiation dose exposure was monitored over one month using three official dosimeters placed at defined locations within the angiography suite, using the floor-mounted C-arm as a reference point. Dose values were extrapolated to estimate annual exposure. Additionally, experimental dose rate measurements were performed at eight locations and three height levels (foot, torso, eye) under standardized conditions using both standard and low-dose DSA protocols. Results Official dosimeter readings averaged less than 2% of the reference value at the C-arm. The extrapolated annual occupational radiation exposure was low (0.44 mSv), with the highest value of 1.03 mSv near the door to the supply room. Experimental measurements revealed average radiation dose rates of 885 µSv/h; with a wide range from: 12 to 6109 µSv/h. Dose rates were more strongly influenced by the shielding effect of stationary protective equipment (reduction factor of 31) than by spatial distance. The highest radiation exposure occurred at foot level. Low-dose protocols reduced ambient radiation by an average of 23%. Conclusion Occupational exposure remained well below legal thresholds but varied spatially. Stationary shielding and low-dose protocols proved most effective for dose reduction.
Title: Occupational radiation exposure of radiologic technologists in Interventional neuroradiology
Description:
Abstract Purpose With the rising number of angiographic interventional procedures, occupational radiation exposure is becoming increasingly relevant.
As even low doses may contribute to stochastic health effects, enhanced radiological protection measures are warranted.
This study aimed to systematically quantify the radiation exposure of radiologic technologists under routine clinical conditions and in an experimental setting.
Methods Radiation dose exposure was monitored over one month using three official dosimeters placed at defined locations within the angiography suite, using the floor-mounted C-arm as a reference point.
Dose values were extrapolated to estimate annual exposure.
Additionally, experimental dose rate measurements were performed at eight locations and three height levels (foot, torso, eye) under standardized conditions using both standard and low-dose DSA protocols.
Results Official dosimeter readings averaged less than 2% of the reference value at the C-arm.
The extrapolated annual occupational radiation exposure was low (0.
44 mSv), with the highest value of 1.
03 mSv near the door to the supply room.
Experimental measurements revealed average radiation dose rates of 885 µSv/h; with a wide range from: 12 to 6109 µSv/h.
Dose rates were more strongly influenced by the shielding effect of stationary protective equipment (reduction factor of 31) than by spatial distance.
The highest radiation exposure occurred at foot level.
Low-dose protocols reduced ambient radiation by an average of 23%.
Conclusion Occupational exposure remained well below legal thresholds but varied spatially.
Stationary shielding and low-dose protocols proved most effective for dose reduction.

Related Results

Radiation Safety Compliance and Protective Practices Among Radiologic Technologists
Radiation Safety Compliance and Protective Practices Among Radiologic Technologists
Radiologic technologists play a crucial role in healthcare by utilizing diagnostic imaging technologies to aid in patient care. Given the inherent risks associated with ionizing ra...
Neuroradiology in Türkiye
Neuroradiology in Türkiye
Abstract Neuroradiology in Türkiye is considered to have begun in 1955 at Istanbul University’s Capa Medical School, where neurosurgeons pioneered vascular neuror...
A Framework for Predicting Radiologic Physics Achievement among Radiologic Technology Students
A Framework for Predicting Radiologic Physics Achievement among Radiologic Technology Students
Radiologic Physics is one of the most challenging professional subjects in the Radiologic Technology (RT) field. It encompasses a wide range of physics concept, calculations, and r...
Social media in interventional radiology
Social media in interventional radiology
AbstractIntroductionSocial media provides opportunities for Interventional Radiologists to share research, communicate with colleagues, provide health information and advertise the...
Quantification of Radiation Exposure in Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Residents
Quantification of Radiation Exposure in Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Residents
Introduction: Natural radiation exposure in the general population averages 3 milliSieverts (mSv) annually; however, radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents is not ...
MINIMIZING THE EXPOSURE TO THE EYE LENS OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS ASSISTING PATIENTS DURING CHEST X RAYS: A PHANTOM STUDY
MINIMIZING THE EXPOSURE TO THE EYE LENS OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS ASSISTING PATIENTS DURING CHEST X RAYS: A PHANTOM STUDY
Abstract As chest x rays involve risks of patients falling, radiologic technologists (technologists) commonly assist patients, and as the assistance takes place near...
History of the Swedish Society of Neuroradiology and Swedish Neuroradiology 1990–2024
History of the Swedish Society of Neuroradiology and Swedish Neuroradiology 1990–2024
Abstract The chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution and current state of neuroradiology in Sweden from 1990 to 2024, focusing on key developme...

Back to Top