Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Social media in interventional radiology

View through CrossRef
AbstractIntroductionSocial media provides opportunities for Interventional Radiologists to share research, communicate with colleagues, provide health information and advertise their clinical practice. This study aims to examine the online and social media presence of currently practicing Australian Interventional Radiologists.MethodsSystematic Google searches were undertaken in May 2019 and updated in May 2020 to identify practicing Interventional Radiologists in Australia. Comprehensive searches of practice websites and social media platforms (Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, ResearchGate, YouTube) were undertaken for each Interventional Radiologist.ResultsThere were 265 Interventional Radiologists identified as currently practising in Australia, including 209 Interventional Radiologists (excluding Interventional Neuroradiologists), 49 Interventional Neuroradiologists and 7 that practise across both Interventional Radiology and Interventional Neuroradiology. 72% of Interventional Radiologists had at least one social media account, with LinkedIn the most widely used social media platform (60%). There was a significant negative correlation between the total number of social media accounts and years in practice (P = 0.04). Across the states, a higher population per IR was positively correlated with a higher average number of social media accounts per IR (P = 0.04). Interventional Neuroradiologists had a significantly higher average number of social media accounts compared to Interventional Radiologists (1.94 vs 1.29, P < 0.01).ConclusionsMost Australian Interventional Radiologists have a readily identifiable social media presence. There is potential for further utilisation of social media for academic, educational and business purposes.
Title: Social media in interventional radiology
Description:
AbstractIntroductionSocial media provides opportunities for Interventional Radiologists to share research, communicate with colleagues, provide health information and advertise their clinical practice.
This study aims to examine the online and social media presence of currently practicing Australian Interventional Radiologists.
MethodsSystematic Google searches were undertaken in May 2019 and updated in May 2020 to identify practicing Interventional Radiologists in Australia.
Comprehensive searches of practice websites and social media platforms (Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, ResearchGate, YouTube) were undertaken for each Interventional Radiologist.
ResultsThere were 265 Interventional Radiologists identified as currently practising in Australia, including 209 Interventional Radiologists (excluding Interventional Neuroradiologists), 49 Interventional Neuroradiologists and 7 that practise across both Interventional Radiology and Interventional Neuroradiology.
72% of Interventional Radiologists had at least one social media account, with LinkedIn the most widely used social media platform (60%).
There was a significant negative correlation between the total number of social media accounts and years in practice (P = 0.
04).
Across the states, a higher population per IR was positively correlated with a higher average number of social media accounts per IR (P = 0.
04).
Interventional Neuroradiologists had a significantly higher average number of social media accounts compared to Interventional Radiologists (1.
94 vs 1.
29, P < 0.
01).
ConclusionsMost Australian Interventional Radiologists have a readily identifiable social media presence.
There is potential for further utilisation of social media for academic, educational and business purposes.

Related Results

Beyond Turf Wars: Redefining Boundaries and Building Consensus in Interventional Radiology
Beyond Turf Wars: Redefining Boundaries and Building Consensus in Interventional Radiology
Abstract Interventional radiology (IR) has evolved from diagnostic angiography to a core therapeutic specialty addressing acute ischemic stroke, peripheral arteri...
The Hybrid Breeding of Nanomedia
The Hybrid Breeding of Nanomedia
IntroductionIf human beings have become a geophysical force, capable of impacting the very crust and atmosphere of the planet, and if geophysical forces become objects of study, pr...
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Interventional Radiology in Germany
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Interventional Radiology in Germany
Purpose To investigate the effect of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on interventional radiology (IR) in Germany in 2020 and 2021. Materials und Methods This retrospectiv...
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAFTAR PUSTAKAAditama, M. H. R., &amp; Selfiardy, S. (2022). Kehidupan Mahasiswa Kuliah Sambil Bekerja di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Kidspedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 3(...
Alts and Automediality: Compartmentalising the Self through Multiple Social Media Profiles
Alts and Automediality: Compartmentalising the Self through Multiple Social Media Profiles
IntroductionAlt, or alternative, accounts are secondary profiles people use in addition to a main account on a social media platform. They are a kind of automediation, a way of rep...
CIRSE and World Interventional Radiology
CIRSE and World Interventional Radiology
AbstractOn the occasion of the 20th Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (ISVIR) Annual Conference in Lucknow, India, in February 2018, the President of the Card...
Purposes for social media content production
Purposes for social media content production
Informed by the uses and gratifications framework (Katz & Foulkes, 1962; Lasswell, 1948) according to which people produce and consume certain media for specific uses and becau...

Back to Top