Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Interventional Radiology in Germany

View through CrossRef
Purpose To investigate the effect of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on interventional radiology (IR) in Germany in 2020 and 2021. Materials und Methods This retrospective study is based on the nationwide interventional radiology procedures documented in the quality register of the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy (DeGIR-QS-Register). The nationwide volume of interventions in the pandemic years 2020 and 2021 was compared with the pre-pandemic period (Poisson-test, Mann-Whitney test). The aggregated data were additionally evaluated by intervention type with differentiated consideration of the temporal epidemiological infection occurrence. Results During the two pandemic years 2020 and 2021, the number of interventional procedures increased by appr. 4 % compared to the same period of the previous year (n = 190 454 and 189 447 vs. n = 183 123, respectively, p < 0.001). Only the first pandemic wave in spring 2020 (weeks 12–16) showed a significant temporary drop in the number of interventional procedures by 26 % (n = 4799, p < 0.05). This primarily involved interventions that were not immediately medically urgent, such as pain treatments or elective arterial revascularization. In contrast, interventions in the field of interventional oncology, such as port catheter implantations and local tumor ablations, remained unaffected. The decline of the first wave of infection was accompanied by a rapid recovery and a significant, partly compensatory, 14 % increase in procedure numbers in the second half of 2020 compared to the same period of the previous year (n = 77 151 vs. 67 852, p < 0.001). Subsequent pandemic waves had no effect on intervention numbers. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic in Germany led to a significant short-term decrease in interventional radiology procedures in the initial phase. A compensatory increase in the number of procedures was observed in the subsequent period. This reflects the adaptability and robustness of IR and the high demand for minimally invasive radiological procedures in medical care. Key points:  Citation Format
Title: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Interventional Radiology in Germany
Description:
Purpose To investigate the effect of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on interventional radiology (IR) in Germany in 2020 and 2021.
Materials und Methods This retrospective study is based on the nationwide interventional radiology procedures documented in the quality register of the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy (DeGIR-QS-Register).
The nationwide volume of interventions in the pandemic years 2020 and 2021 was compared with the pre-pandemic period (Poisson-test, Mann-Whitney test).
The aggregated data were additionally evaluated by intervention type with differentiated consideration of the temporal epidemiological infection occurrence.
Results During the two pandemic years 2020 and 2021, the number of interventional procedures increased by appr.
4 % compared to the same period of the previous year (n = 190 454 and 189 447 vs.
n = 183 123, respectively, p < 0.
001).
Only the first pandemic wave in spring 2020 (weeks 12–16) showed a significant temporary drop in the number of interventional procedures by 26 % (n = 4799, p < 0.
05).
This primarily involved interventions that were not immediately medically urgent, such as pain treatments or elective arterial revascularization.
In contrast, interventions in the field of interventional oncology, such as port catheter implantations and local tumor ablations, remained unaffected.
The decline of the first wave of infection was accompanied by a rapid recovery and a significant, partly compensatory, 14 % increase in procedure numbers in the second half of 2020 compared to the same period of the previous year (n = 77 151 vs.
67 852, p < 0.
001).
Subsequent pandemic waves had no effect on intervention numbers.
Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic in Germany led to a significant short-term decrease in interventional radiology procedures in the initial phase.
A compensatory increase in the number of procedures was observed in the subsequent period.
This reflects the adaptability and robustness of IR and the high demand for minimally invasive radiological procedures in medical care.
Key points:  Citation Format.

Related Results

The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Macroeconomics on the Sharia Stock Indexes in Indonesia
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Macroeconomics on the Sharia Stock Indexes in Indonesia
ABSTRACT The Covid-19 pandemic has changed economic conditions in various countries, including Indonesia. One of the sectors affected is the capital market sector which can also de...
Beyond Turf Wars: Redefining Boundaries and Building Consensus in Interventional Radiology
Beyond Turf Wars: Redefining Boundaries and Building Consensus in Interventional Radiology
Abstract Interventional radiology (IR) has evolved from diagnostic angiography to a core therapeutic specialty addressing acute ischemic stroke, peripheral arteri...
Social media in interventional radiology
Social media in interventional radiology
AbstractIntroductionSocial media provides opportunities for Interventional Radiologists to share research, communicate with colleagues, provide health information and advertise the...
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...
PERSEPSI IBU HAMIL TENTANG VAKSIN COVID-19 TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN VAKSINASI COVID-19
PERSEPSI IBU HAMIL TENTANG VAKSIN COVID-19 TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN VAKSINASI COVID-19
Latar Belakang: kasus positif Covid-19 di Kabupaten Sukoharjo tahun 2021 mencapai 12.350 dan terus mengalami penambahan jumlah. Dari jumlah tersebut terdapat 168 kasus positif Covi...
Long COVID Treatment No Silver Bullets, Only a Few Bronze BBs
Long COVID Treatment No Silver Bullets, Only a Few Bronze BBs
Long COVID is the consequence of having had COVID. Long COVID has many other names including Long-haul COVID, Post-COVID conditions (PCC), Post-COVID-19 syndrome, Post-acute seque...
Long COVID Treatment No Silver Bullets, Only a Few Bronze BBs
Long COVID Treatment No Silver Bullets, Only a Few Bronze BBs
Long COVID is the consequence of having had COVID. Long COVID has many other names including Long-haul COVID, Post-COVID conditions (PCC), Post-COVID-19 syndrome, Post-acute seque...

Back to Top