Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bacteraemia after leadless pacemaker implantation

View through CrossRef
Background: Transvenous permanent pacemaker related infection is a severe condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Leadless pacemakers may be more resistant to bacterial seeding during bloodstream infection because of its small surface area and encapsulation in the right ventricle. This study reports the incidence and outcomes of bacteraemia in patients implanted with a Micra leadless pacemaker. We present 18F-FDG PET/CT findings obtained in a sub-group of patients. Methods: We report a retrospective cohort study of 155 patients who underwent a Micra TPS implant procedure at the University Hospitals of Leuven between July 2015 and July 2019. We identified the patients who developed an episode of bacteraemia, proved by ≥2 positive blood cultures. Results: Of the 155 patients, 15 patients presented an episode of bacteraemia at a median of 226 days (range: 3-1129) days after the implant procedure. Gram positive species accounted for 73.3% (n=11) of the bacteraemia including Staphylococcus (n=5), Enterococcus (n=3) and Streptococcus (n=3). The source of infection was identified in 9 patients (60%) including endocarditis in 4 patients, urinary tract in 3 patients, and skin in 2 patients. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging performed in 6 patients did not show sign of infection around the leadless pacemaker. Bacteraemia was resolved in all patients after adequate antibiotherapy. Four patients died early during follow up. For all other patients, there were no recurrence of bacteraemia during a median follow up of 263 days (range 15-1134). Conclusion: In our small cohort, no leadless pacemaker endocarditis was observed among patients with bacteraemia.
Title: Bacteraemia after leadless pacemaker implantation
Description:
Background: Transvenous permanent pacemaker related infection is a severe condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
Leadless pacemakers may be more resistant to bacterial seeding during bloodstream infection because of its small surface area and encapsulation in the right ventricle.
This study reports the incidence and outcomes of bacteraemia in patients implanted with a Micra leadless pacemaker.
We present 18F-FDG PET/CT findings obtained in a sub-group of patients.
Methods: We report a retrospective cohort study of 155 patients who underwent a Micra TPS implant procedure at the University Hospitals of Leuven between July 2015 and July 2019.
We identified the patients who developed an episode of bacteraemia, proved by ≥2 positive blood cultures.
Results: Of the 155 patients, 15 patients presented an episode of bacteraemia at a median of 226 days (range: 3-1129) days after the implant procedure.
Gram positive species accounted for 73.
3% (n=11) of the bacteraemia including Staphylococcus (n=5), Enterococcus (n=3) and Streptococcus (n=3).
The source of infection was identified in 9 patients (60%) including endocarditis in 4 patients, urinary tract in 3 patients, and skin in 2 patients.
18F-FDG PET/CT imaging performed in 6 patients did not show sign of infection around the leadless pacemaker.
Bacteraemia was resolved in all patients after adequate antibiotherapy.
Four patients died early during follow up.
For all other patients, there were no recurrence of bacteraemia during a median follow up of 263 days (range 15-1134).
Conclusion: In our small cohort, no leadless pacemaker endocarditis was observed among patients with bacteraemia.

Related Results

Aveir Leadless Pacemaker implantation in pediatric population: a case series
Aveir Leadless Pacemaker implantation in pediatric population: a case series
Abstract Background While the Medtronic Micra pacemaker provided a small device for leadless pacemaker implantation, the Aveir d...
Leadless Pacemaker tine fracture and dislocation: two case reports
Leadless Pacemaker tine fracture and dislocation: two case reports
Abstract The rate of leadless pacemaker implantation is increasing worldwide. To date, there have been few reports of leadless pacemaker dislocation and extraction. This ar...
P185 FOLLOW–UP OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING POST–EXTRACTION LEADLESS PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION
P185 FOLLOW–UP OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING POST–EXTRACTION LEADLESS PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION
Abstract Introduction The implantation of traditional stimulation devices involves numerous complications, in the short and long...
Abstract 4367732: Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in the Region of Bachmann’s Bundle: Initial Results
Abstract 4367732: Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in the Region of Bachmann’s Bundle: Initial Results
Background: Leadless pacemakers are an emerging technology offering a less invasive alternative to traditional transvenous systems. Bachmann bundle (BB) pacing ...
Leadless pacemaker implantation sites confirmed by computed tomography and their parameters and complication rates
Leadless pacemaker implantation sites confirmed by computed tomography and their parameters and complication rates
AbstractBackgroundImplantations of leadless pacemakers in the septum lower the risk of cardiac perforation. However, the relationship between the implantation site and the success ...
Improving outcomes in single chamber leadless pacemakers: strategies for minimizing vascular complications
Improving outcomes in single chamber leadless pacemakers: strategies for minimizing vascular complications
Abstract Background Leadless pacemaker therapy is associated with a significant reduction in lead-related complication rate compared to conventional...
The angle of the tines before the pull and hold test predicts engagement of the tines in Micra leadless pacemaker implantation
The angle of the tines before the pull and hold test predicts engagement of the tines in Micra leadless pacemaker implantation
AbstractBackgroundMicra leadless pacemaker is secured to the myocardium by engagement of at least 2/4 tines confirmed with pull and hold test. However, the pull and hold test is so...

Back to Top