Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Framework for Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Education
View through CrossRef
Contributions: An adoption framework to include GenAI in the university curriculum. It identifies and highlights the role of different stakeholders (university management, students, staff, etc.) during the adoption process. It also proposes an objective approach based upon an evaluation matrix to assess the success and outcome of the GenAI adoption.
Background: Universities worldwide are debating and struggling with the adoption of GenAI in their curriculum. GenAI has impacted our perspective on traditional methods of academic integrity and the scholarship of teaching, learning, and research. Both the faculty and students are unsure about the approach in the absence of clear guidelines through the administration and regulators. This requires an established framework to define a process and articulate the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder involved.
Research Questions: Whether the academic ecosystem requires a methodology to adopt GenAI into its curriculum? A systematic approach for the academic staff to ensure the students' learning outcomes are met with the adoption of GenAI. How to measure and communicate the adoption of GenAI in the university setup? Methodology: The methodology employed in this study focuses on examining the university education system and assessing the opportunities and challenges related to incorporating GenAI in teaching and learning. Additionally, it identifies a gap and the absence of a comprehensive framework that obstructs the effective integration of GenAI within the academic environment.
Findings: The literature survey results indicate the limited or no adoption of GenAI by the university, which further reflects the dilemma in the minds of different stakeholders. For the successful adoption of GenAI, a standard framework is proposed i) for effective redesign of the course curriculum, ii) for enabling staff and students, iii) to define an evaluation matrix to measure the effectiveness and success of the adoption process.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Title: Framework for Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Education
Description:
Contributions: An adoption framework to include GenAI in the university curriculum.
It identifies and highlights the role of different stakeholders (university management, students, staff, etc.
) during the adoption process.
It also proposes an objective approach based upon an evaluation matrix to assess the success and outcome of the GenAI adoption.
Background: Universities worldwide are debating and struggling with the adoption of GenAI in their curriculum.
GenAI has impacted our perspective on traditional methods of academic integrity and the scholarship of teaching, learning, and research.
Both the faculty and students are unsure about the approach in the absence of clear guidelines through the administration and regulators.
This requires an established framework to define a process and articulate the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder involved.
Research Questions: Whether the academic ecosystem requires a methodology to adopt GenAI into its curriculum? A systematic approach for the academic staff to ensure the students' learning outcomes are met with the adoption of GenAI.
How to measure and communicate the adoption of GenAI in the university setup? Methodology: The methodology employed in this study focuses on examining the university education system and assessing the opportunities and challenges related to incorporating GenAI in teaching and learning.
Additionally, it identifies a gap and the absence of a comprehensive framework that obstructs the effective integration of GenAI within the academic environment.
Findings: The literature survey results indicate the limited or no adoption of GenAI by the university, which further reflects the dilemma in the minds of different stakeholders.
For the successful adoption of GenAI, a standard framework is proposed i) for effective redesign of the course curriculum, ii) for enabling staff and students, iii) to define an evaluation matrix to measure the effectiveness and success of the adoption process.
Related Results
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Tertiary Level Education in Bangladesh: Practices, Benefits, Challenges, and Prospects
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Tertiary Level Education in Bangladesh: Practices, Benefits, Challenges, and Prospects
Aim/Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the potential of integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in tertiary education. It examined current practices among teac...
Unlocking Proficiency: Experts’ Views on the Use of Generative AI
Unlocking Proficiency: Experts’ Views on the Use of Generative AI
The rapid proliferation and adoption of generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) underscore its ease of use. However, there has been limited research exploring what constitutes p...
Building Proficiency in Generative AI: Key Competencies for Success
Building Proficiency in Generative AI: Key Competencies for Success
The rapid adoption of generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) underscores its ease of use, yet research on GenAI proficiency and competencies is limited. This study uses semi-st...
" He made me feel less alone": Adolescents’ Engagement with GenAI for Emotional Support.
" He made me feel less alone": Adolescents’ Engagement with GenAI for Emotional Support.
An increasing number of adolescents worldwide experience mental health difficulties, yet access to formal and informal support remains limited. Concurrently, Generative Artificial ...
" He made me feel less alone": Adolescents’ Engagement with GenAI for Emotional Support.
" He made me feel less alone": Adolescents’ Engagement with GenAI for Emotional Support.
An increasing number of adolescents worldwide experience mental health difficulties, yet access to formal and informal support remains limited. Concurrently, Generative Artificial ...
Editorial Note: GenAI for Academic Writing – Friend or Foe?
Editorial Note: GenAI for Academic Writing – Friend or Foe?
In an article published in Nature titled “ChatGPT listed as author in research papers” Stone-Walker (2023) shocks the academic community with the fact that GenAI tools such as Chat...
Mapping the Ethical Landscape of GenAI: Insights from Applied Linguistics Publication Policies
Mapping the Ethical Landscape of GenAI: Insights from Applied Linguistics Publication Policies
The swift rise of generative AI (GenAI) in 2022 has led to extensive acceptance in academic fields; yet, applied
linguists have not achieved agreement on its ethical and suitable a...
Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Among Biomedical Academics with Career Trajectories in Healthcare: A Mixed Methods Study
Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Among Biomedical Academics with Career Trajectories in Healthcare: A Mixed Methods Study
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has been a viable technology for decades, yet widespread adoption in healthcare and academic settings has remained limited to research. O...

