Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Mongolia’s Constitutional Evolution in 100 Years: Reflections on Socialist and Democratic Eras
View through CrossRef
A century has passed since Mongolia embarked on its constitutional evolution in 1924 when the first constitution was adopted. The 1924 constitution, for the first time, set the tone for the constitutional form of governance by laying down the legal frame-work of the political regime of what came to be known as the Mongolian People’s Republic. This marked the beginning of the socialist era in the history of postindependence Mongolia with Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party ruling the government under the system of a one-party rule. The second and third constitutions were adopted in 1940 and 1960 respectively. While the 1940 constitution emphasized on non-capitalist lines with subsequent development into socialism, the 1960 constitution proclaimed the attainment of socialism until it was amended in 1990 to approve a pluralistic democracy with a multi-party system. Consequently, a new constitution, the fourth one since 1924, was adopted in 1992. By employing an electoral democracy and dissolving the Mongolian People’s Republic, this constitution marked an unambiguous departure from the socialist era, particularly in terms of Soviet influence and entered into a democratic era. It is in this background that the main objective of the present work is to reflect upon Mongolia’s constitutional evolution during socialist and democratic eras in a comparative perspective. It critically reviews the notions behind constitutional amendments and their implications for the political landscape of Mongolia in a long span of 100 years. It argues that although the constitutions of the two eras remain quite different in terms of convergence, they do provide a clear picture of what the country’s political system was during its Soviet past and its appearance in the present in terms of socialist versus democratic credentials.
Title: Mongolia’s Constitutional Evolution in 100 Years: Reflections on Socialist and Democratic Eras
Description:
A century has passed since Mongolia embarked on its constitutional evolution in 1924 when the first constitution was adopted.
The 1924 constitution, for the first time, set the tone for the constitutional form of governance by laying down the legal frame-work of the political regime of what came to be known as the Mongolian People’s Republic.
This marked the beginning of the socialist era in the history of postindependence Mongolia with Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party ruling the government under the system of a one-party rule.
The second and third constitutions were adopted in 1940 and 1960 respectively.
While the 1940 constitution emphasized on non-capitalist lines with subsequent development into socialism, the 1960 constitution proclaimed the attainment of socialism until it was amended in 1990 to approve a pluralistic democracy with a multi-party system.
Consequently, a new constitution, the fourth one since 1924, was adopted in 1992.
By employing an electoral democracy and dissolving the Mongolian People’s Republic, this constitution marked an unambiguous departure from the socialist era, particularly in terms of Soviet influence and entered into a democratic era.
It is in this background that the main objective of the present work is to reflect upon Mongolia’s constitutional evolution during socialist and democratic eras in a comparative perspective.
It critically reviews the notions behind constitutional amendments and their implications for the political landscape of Mongolia in a long span of 100 years.
It argues that although the constitutions of the two eras remain quite different in terms of convergence, they do provide a clear picture of what the country’s political system was during its Soviet past and its appearance in the present in terms of socialist versus democratic credentials.
Related Results
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
African Annals of Medicine reviewers in 2024
African Annals of Medicine reviewers in 2024
Le comité éditorial des Annales Africaines de Médecine tient à remercier les lecteurs qui ont analysé les manuscrits soumis pour publication au cours de l’année 2024 et ont ainsi d...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Inner Mongolia, Outer Mongolia
Inner Mongolia, Outer Mongolia
The Mongolian Empire, which reigned over the Eurasia Continent, was a great empire in the Middle Ages. Now, however, it is a divided nation, with a current population of about 10 m...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
RA03.03: THE IMPACT OF ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) ON PATIENTS UNDERGOING OESOPHAGECTOMY
RA03.03: THE IMPACT OF ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) ON PATIENTS UNDERGOING OESOPHAGECTOMY
Abstract
Background
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is defined as a multimodal care pathway designed to achieve early rec...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...

