Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

RA03.03: THE IMPACT OF ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) ON PATIENTS UNDERGOING OESOPHAGECTOMY

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is defined as a multimodal care pathway designed to achieve early recovery for patients undergoing surgery. For patients undergoing oesophagectomy such pathways are complex and must involve a wide multi-disciplinary team. The importance of peri-operative nutrition is especially relevant in this patient group. We describe our experience of the impact of an ERAS pathway in a high volume oesophago-gastric unit on both short and medium term patient outcomes. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing open 2 phase subtotal oesophagectomy with two field lymphadenectomy in a 12 month period following the introduction of an ERAS pathway were included in the study. Outcomes were compared with consecutive patients undergoing the same procedure over a 12 month period prior to the introduction of the ERAS pathway. All patients were treated in a single UK unit. Adherence to the ERAS pathway was monitored by a dedicated ERAS coordinator. All data were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous and Chi2 for categorical data. Results 189 patients were included (97 pre-ERAS and 92 ERAS). There were no demographic differences between the patient groups. The rate of severe post-operative complications (Accordion score 3 + ) was identical between groups (29%). Median length of hospital stay was significantly reduced with ERAS (10 days v 14 days pre-ERAS (P < 0.001)) as was the total readmission rate (21% v 39% P = 0.006). Weight loss following surgery was significantly reduced with ERAS. At 2 weeks 1% of patients had lost over 10% of their pre-operative weight compared with 32% pre-ERAS (P < 0.001). A significant difference was maintained at 6 weeks (9% v 55%), 3 months (19% v 66%) and 6 months (35% v 71%). Conclusion Our results demonstrate the positive impact of ERAS for patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Despite no reduction in post-operative complication rates, both hospital stay and readmission rates were reduced, suggesting a positive impact of ERAS on patients’ response to complications. Far fewer patients were readmitted for nutritional reasons/failure to thrive following the introduction of ERAS. Implementing an ERAS pathway requires a dedicated multi-disciplinary team to provide the required peri-operative care both in the hospital and community. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Title: RA03.03: THE IMPACT OF ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) ON PATIENTS UNDERGOING OESOPHAGECTOMY
Description:
Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is defined as a multimodal care pathway designed to achieve early recovery for patients undergoing surgery.
For patients undergoing oesophagectomy such pathways are complex and must involve a wide multi-disciplinary team.
The importance of peri-operative nutrition is especially relevant in this patient group.
We describe our experience of the impact of an ERAS pathway in a high volume oesophago-gastric unit on both short and medium term patient outcomes.
Methods Consecutive patients undergoing open 2 phase subtotal oesophagectomy with two field lymphadenectomy in a 12 month period following the introduction of an ERAS pathway were included in the study.
Outcomes were compared with consecutive patients undergoing the same procedure over a 12 month period prior to the introduction of the ERAS pathway.
All patients were treated in a single UK unit.
Adherence to the ERAS pathway was monitored by a dedicated ERAS coordinator.
All data were collected prospectively.
Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous and Chi2 for categorical data.
Results 189 patients were included (97 pre-ERAS and 92 ERAS).
There were no demographic differences between the patient groups.
The rate of severe post-operative complications (Accordion score 3 + ) was identical between groups (29%).
Median length of hospital stay was significantly reduced with ERAS (10 days v 14 days pre-ERAS (P < 0.
001)) as was the total readmission rate (21% v 39% P = 0.
006).
Weight loss following surgery was significantly reduced with ERAS.
At 2 weeks 1% of patients had lost over 10% of their pre-operative weight compared with 32% pre-ERAS (P < 0.
001).
A significant difference was maintained at 6 weeks (9% v 55%), 3 months (19% v 66%) and 6 months (35% v 71%).
Conclusion Our results demonstrate the positive impact of ERAS for patients undergoing oesophagectomy.
Despite no reduction in post-operative complication rates, both hospital stay and readmission rates were reduced, suggesting a positive impact of ERAS on patients’ response to complications.
Far fewer patients were readmitted for nutritional reasons/failure to thrive following the introduction of ERAS.
Implementing an ERAS pathway requires a dedicated multi-disciplinary team to provide the required peri-operative care both in the hospital and community.
Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Related Results

Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Learning Curve for Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy of Esophageal Cancer and contrast with Open Oesophagectomy
Learning Curve for Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy of Esophageal Cancer and contrast with Open Oesophagectomy
Abstract Purpose: Minimally invasive oesophagectomy is a technically demanding procedure; thus, the learning curve of this procedure should be explored. Then the relatively...
Assessing Patient Satisfaction with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Elective Cesarean Deliveries
Assessing Patient Satisfaction with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Elective Cesarean Deliveries
Objective: To assess patient satisfaction with the ERAS protocol in elective cesarean sections. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of...
HP27
MORTALITY, MORBIDITY AND 2 YEAR SURVIVAL FOLLOWING OESOPHAGECTOMY – DUNEDIN EXPERIENCE
HP27
MORTALITY, MORBIDITY AND 2 YEAR SURVIVAL FOLLOWING OESOPHAGECTOMY – DUNEDIN EXPERIENCE
Purpose  Oesophagectomy is associated with considerable morbidity, mortality and poor survival of patients who have undergone oesophagectomy for oesophageal carcinoma. Numerous stu...
Safety and outcomes after oesophagectomy in southern New Zealand: a 25‐year audit of a low volume centre
Safety and outcomes after oesophagectomy in southern New Zealand: a 25‐year audit of a low volume centre
AbstractBackgroundOver the last 2 decades, outcomes for oesophageal cancer have improved due to advances in surgical and oncological practice. Optimizing outcomes by centralization...
Efficacy of Preoperative Enhanced Recovery Protocols Versus Standard Care in Urologic Surgery
Efficacy of Preoperative Enhanced Recovery Protocols Versus Standard Care in Urologic Surgery
Background: A contemporary, multimodal perioperative strategy, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) procedures are designed to reduce surgical stress, preserve physiological func...
Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Children
Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Children
Introduction Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been utilized among various adult populations, and successful outcomes are well described in the liter...

Back to Top