Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract 1145: Therapeutic drug monitoring of Sunitinib in real-world patients

View through CrossRef
Abstract Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) with model-based adaptive dosing is expected to quickly ensure that exposure levels of anticancer agents are in the adequate range of plasma concentrations. Here, we have compared such TDM + in silico approach with empirical changes in dosing performed upon clinical signs in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with Sunitinib. A total of 31 patients were monitored in our institute. All patients were treated with a standard starting dose of 50 mg QD following the 4/2 schedule. Sunitinib and n-desethyl sunitinib trough levels were assayed at steady state by a fully validated LC-MS/MS analysis. A PK-pop model with Bayesian estimate implemented on Monolix helped to identify individual PK parameters from a single time-point. Two different target exposures were considered (i.e., trough levels comprised between 50 and 100 ng/ml or 0-24h AUC comprised between 1250 and 2150 ng/ml.h). The PK model enabled to simulate both trough levels and 0-24h AUC from a single sample, regardless of the sampling time. Overall, dosing was modified empirically in about 54% of the patients after treatment started, mostly (46%) for reducing the dosing after that toxicities showed. Clinical benefit (i.e., stable disease + partial response + complete reponse) was achieved in 54% of patients but treatment discontinuation was observed in 58% of the patients eventually, mostly because of severe side-effects. A relationship between baseline exposure levels and early onset treatment-related toxicities was found. Because of the various changes in dosing, no such relationship was found between baseline exposure levels and efficacy evaluated at 3 months. TDM showed that only 45% of the patients were in the right window for trough levels (i.e., 50-100 ng/ml) and only 26% when considering AUC as the target exposure (i.e., 1200-2150 ng/ml.h). Consequently, the PK/PD model would have suggested to rapidly customize dosing in a much larger part of the patients (i.e., 84% with respect to the target AUCs). Importantly, Sunitinib dosing was empirically reduced only in 41% patients who displayed early-onset severe toxicities, whereas modelling would have immediately proposed to cut the dosing in more than 80% of those patients, thus suggesting that the safety of Sunitinib could have been improved when using our model. Although performed on a limited number of patients, this real-world study supports the hypothesis that TDM associated with PK modelling could help the prescriber to identify the best Sunitinib dosing in a quicker way than empirical change in dosing. Citation Format: Laurent Ferrer, Jonathan Chauvin, Dr Jean-Laurent Deville, Joseph Ciccolini. Therapeutic drug monitoring of Sunitinib in real-world patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1145.
Title: Abstract 1145: Therapeutic drug monitoring of Sunitinib in real-world patients
Description:
Abstract Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) with model-based adaptive dosing is expected to quickly ensure that exposure levels of anticancer agents are in the adequate range of plasma concentrations.
Here, we have compared such TDM + in silico approach with empirical changes in dosing performed upon clinical signs in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with Sunitinib.
A total of 31 patients were monitored in our institute.
All patients were treated with a standard starting dose of 50 mg QD following the 4/2 schedule.
Sunitinib and n-desethyl sunitinib trough levels were assayed at steady state by a fully validated LC-MS/MS analysis.
A PK-pop model with Bayesian estimate implemented on Monolix helped to identify individual PK parameters from a single time-point.
Two different target exposures were considered (i.
e.
, trough levels comprised between 50 and 100 ng/ml or 0-24h AUC comprised between 1250 and 2150 ng/ml.
h).
The PK model enabled to simulate both trough levels and 0-24h AUC from a single sample, regardless of the sampling time.
Overall, dosing was modified empirically in about 54% of the patients after treatment started, mostly (46%) for reducing the dosing after that toxicities showed.
Clinical benefit (i.
e.
, stable disease + partial response + complete reponse) was achieved in 54% of patients but treatment discontinuation was observed in 58% of the patients eventually, mostly because of severe side-effects.
A relationship between baseline exposure levels and early onset treatment-related toxicities was found.
Because of the various changes in dosing, no such relationship was found between baseline exposure levels and efficacy evaluated at 3 months.
TDM showed that only 45% of the patients were in the right window for trough levels (i.
e.
, 50-100 ng/ml) and only 26% when considering AUC as the target exposure (i.
e.
, 1200-2150 ng/ml.
h).
Consequently, the PK/PD model would have suggested to rapidly customize dosing in a much larger part of the patients (i.
e.
, 84% with respect to the target AUCs).
Importantly, Sunitinib dosing was empirically reduced only in 41% patients who displayed early-onset severe toxicities, whereas modelling would have immediately proposed to cut the dosing in more than 80% of those patients, thus suggesting that the safety of Sunitinib could have been improved when using our model.
Although performed on a limited number of patients, this real-world study supports the hypothesis that TDM associated with PK modelling could help the prescriber to identify the best Sunitinib dosing in a quicker way than empirical change in dosing.
Citation Format: Laurent Ferrer, Jonathan Chauvin, Dr Jean-Laurent Deville, Joseph Ciccolini.
Therapeutic drug monitoring of Sunitinib in real-world patients [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1145.

Related Results

Abstract A54: Potential mechanisms of resistance to targeted agents in human clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Abstract A54: Potential mechanisms of resistance to targeted agents in human clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Abstract Targeted therapy with multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKI) has led to a substantial improvement in the standard of care for patients with adv...
Effect of Sunitinib in the Management of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
Effect of Sunitinib in the Management of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Lung cancer is the most common cancer in terms of both incidence and mortality. Although usually managed with surgery, novel immunotherapies are gradually bec...
Abstract 1567: The multi-targeted kinase inhibitor Sunitinib blocks VEGF-C signaling pathway and lymphangiogenesis
Abstract 1567: The multi-targeted kinase inhibitor Sunitinib blocks VEGF-C signaling pathway and lymphangiogenesis
Abstract Metastasis is the main cause of therapeutic failure and death in cancer patient. Tumor cells disseminate to distant organs through lymphatic and blood vesse...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Predictive Factors of Response to Sunitinib in Imatinib-Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): A Multi-Institutional Study
Predictive Factors of Response to Sunitinib in Imatinib-Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): A Multi-Institutional Study
Imatinib 400 mg is the standard of care for medical treatment of advanced GISTs. In the majority of cases, however, GISTs eventually develop resistance to imatinib. The optimal sec...
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...

Back to Top