Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Effect of Sunitinib in the Management of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction Lung cancer is the most common cancer in terms of both incidence and mortality. Although usually managed with surgery, novel immunotherapies are gradually becoming more popular. The effect of sunitinib with and without erlotinib in the management of lung cancer is reviewed. Methods Eligible search engines and databases were screened to identify studies published in English. Any randomized clinical trials studying the effect of sunitinib, either alone or in combination with erlotinib, were included. Results Thirteen studies with a total sample size of 1,062 cases were included. Males (59.5%) were more common than females (40.5%), and the average age of patients was 64 ± 5.03. Most of the patients (71.5%) had a positive smoking status, and non-small cell carcinoma was the most common lung cancer type (95.4%). Almost all of the adverse events, such as headache (100%), weight loss (100%), constipation (100%), leukocytopenia (96%), pain (92.3%), hypertension (90%), dyspnea (88.7%), cough (84.3%), fatigue (81.6%), fever/chills (77.3%), thrombocytopenia (75%), nausea (73.8%), neutropenia (72%), anorexia (71.4%), vomiting (65.1%), anemia (61.3%), and diarrhea (54.5%) were more common in the sunitinib-only group. The mean overall survival for patients receiving sunitinib alone was 213 days, whereas, for patients receiving sunitinib combined with erlotinib, it was 270 days. Conclusion Adverse events may be encountered more frequently in treatment with sunitinib alone compared to the combination of sunitinib and erlotinib. However, sunitinib alone may result in higher disease stability and lower disease progression. Nevertheless, combination therapy may yield a longer median overall survival.
Title: Effect of Sunitinib in the Management of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
Description:
Abstract Introduction Lung cancer is the most common cancer in terms of both incidence and mortality.
Although usually managed with surgery, novel immunotherapies are gradually becoming more popular.
The effect of sunitinib with and without erlotinib in the management of lung cancer is reviewed.
Methods Eligible search engines and databases were screened to identify studies published in English.
Any randomized clinical trials studying the effect of sunitinib, either alone or in combination with erlotinib, were included.
Results Thirteen studies with a total sample size of 1,062 cases were included.
Males (59.
5%) were more common than females (40.
5%), and the average age of patients was 64 ± 5.
03.
Most of the patients (71.
5%) had a positive smoking status, and non-small cell carcinoma was the most common lung cancer type (95.
4%).
Almost all of the adverse events, such as headache (100%), weight loss (100%), constipation (100%), leukocytopenia (96%), pain (92.
3%), hypertension (90%), dyspnea (88.
7%), cough (84.
3%), fatigue (81.
6%), fever/chills (77.
3%), thrombocytopenia (75%), nausea (73.
8%), neutropenia (72%), anorexia (71.
4%), vomiting (65.
1%), anemia (61.
3%), and diarrhea (54.
5%) were more common in the sunitinib-only group.
The mean overall survival for patients receiving sunitinib alone was 213 days, whereas, for patients receiving sunitinib combined with erlotinib, it was 270 days.
Conclusion Adverse events may be encountered more frequently in treatment with sunitinib alone compared to the combination of sunitinib and erlotinib.
However, sunitinib alone may result in higher disease stability and lower disease progression.
Nevertheless, combination therapy may yield a longer median overall survival.

Related Results

Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Abstract SY38-02: Clinical investigations of obesity in cancer: BMI and other confounders
Abstract SY38-02: Clinical investigations of obesity in cancer: BMI and other confounders
Abstract Obesity has been linked with increased incidence and worse outcomes of at least 13 human cancers. For other cancers, our understanding of their relationship...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...

Back to Top