Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of Lichtenstein and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Recurrent Inguinal Hernias
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The aim of our study was the comparative analysis of the results of two surgical methods: tension-free repair by the Lichtenstein technique and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair. In total 52 patients with recurrent inguinal hernia were randomly assigned to the two groups: Lichtenstein (28 patients) and TAPP (24 patients). Comparisons between these groups were done by several preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. For postoperative factors both short-term and long-term results were considered. Average operation time for Lichtenstein group was 59.6 ± 9.9 minutes, compared with 64.4 ± 8.4 minutes for TAPP patients (P = 0.068). In TAPP patients there was less pain in the postoperative period (P = 0.002) and fewer sick-leave days (13.4 ± 1.7 versus 17.5 ± 2.6 days; P < 0.001) and, correspondingly, faster recovery. In the Lichtenstein group a total of 4 postoperative complications (infection, hematoma, seroma, urinary retention) were observed, compared with 8 in the TAPP group (P = 0.19). Statistically significant difference was only by urinary retention (0 for Lichtenstein, 4 for TAPP; P = 0.039). There were no cases of hernia recurrence observed during the follow-up. Chronic pain developed in 5 patients from the Lichtenstein group (17.9%) and 2 patients from the TAPP group (8.3%; P = 0.28) more than 1 year after the operation; 4 Lichtenstein patients (14.3%) and 1 TAPP patient (4.2%; P = 0.23) more than 2 years after the operation; and 3 Lichtenstein patients (10.7%) and 1 TAPP patient (4.2%; P = 0.36) more than 3 years after the operation. For the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias, which are developed after use of conventional (nonmesh) methods, the first choice should be given to the laparoscopic method, especially for young, physically active, nonobese patients, and if there are any contraindications for the laparoscopy, the Lichtenstein approach should be recommended.
International College of Surgeons
Title: Comparison of Lichtenstein and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Recurrent Inguinal Hernias
Description:
Abstract
The aim of our study was the comparative analysis of the results of two surgical methods: tension-free repair by the Lichtenstein technique and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair.
In total 52 patients with recurrent inguinal hernia were randomly assigned to the two groups: Lichtenstein (28 patients) and TAPP (24 patients).
Comparisons between these groups were done by several preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors.
For postoperative factors both short-term and long-term results were considered.
Average operation time for Lichtenstein group was 59.
6 ± 9.
9 minutes, compared with 64.
4 ± 8.
4 minutes for TAPP patients (P = 0.
068).
In TAPP patients there was less pain in the postoperative period (P = 0.
002) and fewer sick-leave days (13.
4 ± 1.
7 versus 17.
5 ± 2.
6 days; P < 0.
001) and, correspondingly, faster recovery.
In the Lichtenstein group a total of 4 postoperative complications (infection, hematoma, seroma, urinary retention) were observed, compared with 8 in the TAPP group (P = 0.
19).
Statistically significant difference was only by urinary retention (0 for Lichtenstein, 4 for TAPP; P = 0.
039).
There were no cases of hernia recurrence observed during the follow-up.
Chronic pain developed in 5 patients from the Lichtenstein group (17.
9%) and 2 patients from the TAPP group (8.
3%; P = 0.
28) more than 1 year after the operation; 4 Lichtenstein patients (14.
3%) and 1 TAPP patient (4.
2%; P = 0.
23) more than 2 years after the operation; and 3 Lichtenstein patients (10.
7%) and 1 TAPP patient (4.
2%; P = 0.
36) more than 3 years after the operation.
For the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias, which are developed after use of conventional (nonmesh) methods, the first choice should be given to the laparoscopic method, especially for young, physically active, nonobese patients, and if there are any contraindications for the laparoscopy, the Lichtenstein approach should be recommended.
Related Results
Comparison of Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty Versus Lichtenstein's Hernioplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Experience at Tertiary Care Hospital
Comparison of Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty Versus Lichtenstein's Hernioplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Experience at Tertiary Care Hospital
Objective: To compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP)hernioplasty and Lichtenstein hernioplasty in the treatment of recurrent inguinal ...
AN EXPERIENCE COMPARING INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR VS DARN REPAIR
AN EXPERIENCE COMPARING INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR VS DARN REPAIR
Background: Several methods for fixing inguinal hernias have been documented. Anterior or posterior approaches,open or laparoscopic procedures, may be used for hernia repair. While...
Clinical outcomes of open versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair in Palestine: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
Clinical outcomes of open versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair in Palestine: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background:
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide, accounting f...
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair Using Memory-Ring Mesh: A Pilot Study
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair Using Memory-Ring Mesh: A Pilot Study
Purpose.To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair using a memory-ring patch (Polysoft™mesh)....
LAPAROSCOPIC TRANS-ABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL VERSUS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR OF INGUINAL HERNIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.
LAPAROSCOPIC TRANS-ABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL VERSUS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR OF INGUINAL HERNIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.
Objectives: To compare Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) to open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair for operation time, acute postoperative pain, complications, ho...
Evaluation of Mobility Status after Inguinal Hernia Surgery
Evaluation of Mobility Status after Inguinal Hernia Surgery
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Many different studies have compared open and laparoscopic-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair techniques according to intraoperativ...
Comparison Between Short Term Outcomes of Lichtenstein and Desarda Repair for Inguinal Hernia
Comparison Between Short Term Outcomes of Lichtenstein and Desarda Repair for Inguinal Hernia
Desarda repair for inguinal hernia repair came into being in 2001 and was an alternative to the Lichtenstein repair where mesh placement is necessary. The procedure is thought to b...
OC-079 LAPAROSCOPIC TAPP APPROACH FOR A RECURRENT INGUINAL HERNIA
OC-079 LAPAROSCOPIC TAPP APPROACH FOR A RECURRENT INGUINAL HERNIA
Abstract
Aim
To analyze the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of a systematized laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal a...

