Statistical comparison analysis of different real-time kinematic methods for the development of photogrammetric products: CORS-RTK, CORS-RTK + PPK, RTK-DRTK2, and RTK + DRTK2 + GCP

Abstract Traditional photogrammetry techniques require the use of Ground Control Points (GCPs) to accurately georeference aerial images captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). However, the process of collecting GCPs can be time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. Real-time kinematic (RTK) georeferencing systems eliminate the need for GCPs without deteriorating the accuracy of photogrammetric products. In this study, a statistical comparison of four RTK georeferencing systems (continuously operating reference station (CORS)-RTK, CORS-RTK + post-processed kinematic (PPK), RTK + dynamic RTK 2 (DRTK2), and RTK + DRTK2 + GCP) is presented. The aerial photo was acquired using a Dà-Jiāng Innovation Phantom 4 RTK. The digital photogrammetric processing was performed in Agisoft Metashape Professional software. A pair of global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) receiving antennas model CHC x900 were used for the establishment of check points (CPs). The accuracy of photogrammetric products was based on a comparison between the modeled and CP coordinates. The four methods showed acceptable planimetric accuracies, with a root mean square error (RMSE) X,Y ranging from 0.0164 to 0.0529 m, making the RTK-CORS + PPK method the most accurate (RMSE X,Y = 0.0164 m). RTK-CORS + PPK, RTK-DRTK2, and RTK-DRTK2 + GCP methods showed high altimetric accuracies, with RMSEZ values ranging from 0.0201 to 0.0334 m. In general, RTK methods showed a high planimetric and altimetric accuracy, similar to the accuracy of the photogrammetric products obtained using a large number of GCPs.