Arrhythmia recurrence reduction with an active esophageal cooling device during radiofrequency ablation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background As the burden of atrial fibrillation continues to rise with an aging population, there have been contrasting positions on the efficacy of left atrial ablation. While ablation techniques have continued to improve over the past decades, arrhythmia recurrence rates must be further reduced given the burden of ablation on patients. Since continuity of lesion sets has been associated with greater lesion durability, it has been theorized that the use of active esophageal cooling may facilitate greater freedom from arrhythmia. Purpose In order to investigate the association between use of active esophageal cooling and arrhythmia recurrence, we performed a multicenter retrospective study of arrhythmia recurrence rates in patients that received active cooling and compared them to those that received luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring. Methods In this study, follow up data were collected from patients that underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) at three separate large medical centers. Data were contained in a prospective hospital registry, a prospective physician registry, or the electronic health record, depending on the center. For each patient included, we recorded whether their ablation utilized LET monitoring or active esophageal cooling, along with their rhythm status at 1-year follow up. Rhythm status at follow-up was determined by either electrocardiogram, Holter monitor, or wearable heart rate monitor. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were created for freedom-from-arrhythmia at one year comparing those in the LET monitoring group to those in the active cooling group. Results Follow up data were collected from 1035 patients. There were 560 patients that received LET monitoring during their original ablation, and 475 patients that underwent active esophageal cooling. KM estimates for freedom-from-arrhythmia at one year were 42% in the LET monitored group and 65% in the actively cooled group (P<.001). Conclusion In this large multicenter study, there is a significant increase in freedom-from-arrhythmia at one year follow-up among patients that received active esophageal cooling as compared to those that underwent LET monitoring.