Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

George Gascoigne, A primer of English poetry (1575)

View through CrossRef
Abstract The first and most necessary point that ever I found meet to be considered in making of a delectable poem is this, to ground it upon some fine invention.1 For it is not enough to roll in pleasant words, nor yet to thunder in ‘ Rym, Ram, Ruff’ by letter (quoth my master Chaucer),2 nor yet to abound in apt vocables or epithets, unless the invention have If I should undertake to write in praise of a gentlewoman, I would neither praise her crystal eye, nor her cherry lip, etc. For these things are trita et obvia. But I would either find some supernatural cause whereby my pen might walk in the superlative degree, or else I would undertake to answer for any imperfection that she hath, and there­upon raise the praise of her commendation. Likewise, if I should dis­close my pretence in love, I would either make a strange discourse of some intolerable passion, or find occasion to plead by the example of some history, or discover my disquiet in shadows per allegoriam, or use the covertest mean that I could to avoid the uncomely customs of common writers.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: George Gascoigne, A primer of English poetry (1575)
Description:
Abstract The first and most necessary point that ever I found meet to be considered in making of a delectable poem is this, to ground it upon some fine invention.
1 For it is not enough to roll in pleasant words, nor yet to thunder in ‘ Rym, Ram, Ruff’ by letter (quoth my master Chaucer),2 nor yet to abound in apt vocables or epithets, unless the invention have If I should undertake to write in praise of a gentlewoman, I would neither praise her crystal eye, nor her cherry lip, etc.
For these things are trita et obvia.
But I would either find some supernatural cause whereby my pen might walk in the superlative degree, or else I would undertake to answer for any imperfection that she hath, and there­upon raise the praise of her commendation.
Likewise, if I should dis­close my pretence in love, I would either make a strange discourse of some intolerable passion, or find occasion to plead by the example of some history, or discover my disquiet in shadows per allegoriam, or use the covertest mean that I could to avoid the uncomely customs of common writers.

Related Results

Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Maria Stepanova (b. 1972) is a contemporary Russian poet who has emerged in recent decades as one of the most original and complex voices on the poetically highly heterogeneous and...
Aviation English - A global perspective: analysis, teaching, assessment
Aviation English - A global perspective: analysis, teaching, assessment
This e-book brings together 13 chapters written by aviation English researchers and practitioners settled in six different countries, representing institutions and universities fro...
Indo-Anglian: Connotations and Denotations
Indo-Anglian: Connotations and Denotations
A different name than English literature, ‘Anglo-Indian Literature’, was given to the body of literature in English that emerged on account of the British interaction with India un...
The Semiotics of New Era Poetry: Estonian Instagram and Rap Poetry
The Semiotics of New Era Poetry: Estonian Instagram and Rap Poetry
Mikhail Gasparov concludes his monograph “A History of European Versification” with the recognition that in the development of particular verse forms in each tradition of poetry, t...
⁠<b>A Critical Study on Contemporary Poetry in Indian English Writing</b>
⁠<b>A Critical Study on Contemporary Poetry in Indian English Writing</b>
This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of Indian English poetry. The author has incorporated samples from notable works and analysed the issues they present to illustrate the...
Eclectism and Syncretism in Gascoigne and Kinwelmersh's Jocasta
Eclectism and Syncretism in Gascoigne and Kinwelmersh's Jocasta
George Gascoigne and Francis Kinwelmersh's Jocasta (printed 1573) does not merely adapt Lodovico Dolce's Giocasta. It also draws on a variety of texts, classical and vernacular, in...
吳喬《圍爐詩話》的比興説
吳喬《圍爐詩話》的比興説
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 吳喬(1611—1695)是明清之際的詩人和詩學理論家,所著詩學論著,現存的有《逃禪詩話》一卷、《圍爐詩話》六卷、《答萬季野詩問》一卷、《答萬季野詩問補遺》一卷和《西崑發微》三卷等。他認為詩是經史之學,主張詩中有人,詩要有意...
George Gascoigne
George Gascoigne
Abstract The publication of Petrarchist love poetry in Tottel’s Miscellany shortly before the accession of Elizabeth made fashionable literature that had been the po...

Back to Top